Rank: New forum user
|
Help please,
I'm currently trying to work out exposure limits for our employees working with pillar grinders using the HSEs caluculator all was going well until I reached trying to add m/s2. The equipment is old and believe the companies are no longer in business. So I'm unable to find the values for Vibration magnitude.
I have worked out the m/s but the m/s2 part is still missing, if anyone can help me with a formula or advise me of some one could help in this matter this would be of great help
Out of interest the grinders are:
Luke & Spencer 73A24108B CTAA
Selson 73A 241 08B CXAA
Thank you Brian C
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Ok, I'll have a try at an answer! I am wondering how you managed to 'work out' the m/s (a velocity) but not the m/s 2 (an acceleration)
Realistically I suggest that you will need to collect some vibration data yourself i.e. get the vibration levels measured, unless you can find some values for that kit on a vibration database (unlikely but you never know)
Incidentally, at an EEF/HSE seminar ion vibration that I attended, the HSE vibration guru said that vibration measurements were notoriously fickle/inaccurate. Measurements using the same kit on the same piece of kit often returned readings that often varied by 50% +. Spooky!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Velocity = acceleration / frequency
Regards
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
If the equipment is old, the company is out of business and even presuming you can get parts and this equipment regularly maintained, could you just not buy a new one? A lot of advances have been made in design over the past few years to reduce vibration levels on tools, would probably be cheaper than buying your own HAVS meter (£5000) or getting a qualified consultant in to do the full measurements for you.
Looked on both HAVS databases I know of, cant see the manufacturer listed there im afraid
Des
|
|
|
|
Rank: New forum user
|
Thanks Phil,
Will keep you posted and post you formula m/s once I get this problem out of the way
Regards Brian (ex 56r Sqn)
|
|
|
|
Rank: New forum user
|
Thank you Des,
The nature of our business is spring production in small to medium volumes. The problem is not the machines themselves but the operator in some cases the operator grinds by hand where it is not possible to use the automated grinders. Some the springs are either very small or too large and no suitable method of holding a spring by mechanical means or some other.
We do have a strict policy where by operators are restricted in the time allowed to carry out manual grinding.
Hopefully you can see why I'm trying to confirm our operator exposure levels with data m/s2,then use the HSEs calculator
If this fails then will take your advice and search for a consultant
Once again thank you
Brian
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I think this has been suitably answered but I would do it like this.
1) use the closest (worst case) equivalent value form the HSE guidance (there is list in here http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/indg175.pdf) I also think there is a list in an ACOP somewhere...
2)Then either test the equipment with a HAV meter as suggested or buy a new one as suggest.
I would also ensure that in the short term exposure was limited to a duration that was unlikely to present risk from a worst case guestimate. (However this might turn out to be a few minutes a day! And don't forget all the other vibrating stuff they are exposed to)
I also am a bit confused as to how you got a value for ms-1 as this is one directional and... hmmm ok its hurting my brain to try and think about the physics....
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Ah! You seem to describe a hand-held workpiece being ground at a pedestal-type grinder?
It is going to be very difficult to measure an operation such as this. HAVS measurements usually involve clamping a 3-axis accelerometer to the workpiece in these situations!
I seem to recall seeing an adapted glove approach advertised somewhere recently, but that would be ill-advised for use at a grinding wheel. In any event the glove would be cumbersome where the piece to be gripped is small and requires great dexterity.
BTW1: I wouldn't suggest that just because a machine is old that newer kit will have better vibration characteristics. Certainly not true of petrol lawnmowers anyway. The more solid "built to last" chassis of lots of older well-maintained kit can be a signicant factor in reduced vibration levels.
BTW2: the velocity of the machine (m/s) moving parts should not be taken as any sort of direct correlation to the acceleration level of vibration encountered at the hand of the operative (m/s2)
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Brian,
i have always found that data supplied by manufacturers never represents real world use, i have also found that different people can use the same equipment with differing results being measured. the condition of the grinding wheel or even a supply from a different manufacturer can also affect your results. i would suggest that you directly measure the vibration a number of times and set your values to overprotect if possible.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I spent £2.99 on the Vibration app for my daughters Ipod touch the other day. Gives X-Y-Z axis measurements and frequencies.
It can even be calibrated, presumably via measuring the iphones own vibrations.
Okay, at £2.00 it is not going to match a £1,000 plus vibration meter but it would give the OP sufficient info to calculate the m/s2 of the grinder to enable a full HAVS assessment to be done.
Early days yet with it and I'm certainly not going to be advising clients to use it or endorse it but it seems a neat little app for the price in the same way that a type 2 sound meter does a job.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Just think of all the useful things you could have bought for £2.99.....................
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Ron - an astute observation! Your response at #8 though hit the nail on the head, and one that I missed in my haste. The vibration of the kit itself in this case is largely irrelevant, as you say it needs to be measured at the work piece (and NOT with an ipod!).
Adrian - thanks for the 'o' level physics reminder, I can't help but feel that you missed the point I was making!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Hi,
Measurement is your best bet, but interestingly, the HSE guidance says you don't have to measure - I think it might even advise you NOT to from memory. I suspect this wouldn't hold much water though when it comes to defending a claim...... Personally, I would steer clear of manufacturers data - I'll stick my neck out and compare it to measuring the weight of an egg on your bathroom scales. A 'middle ground' option is to try to find some existing measured data on one of the excellent Swedish vibration database websites, but this can be hit and miss depending on the machinery you have. If you want me to send you the links, send me a PM.
Ta
Stu
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Indeed Phil - grinding your i-pod would no doubt invalidate the warranty.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I knew the Ipod suggestion would get some stick but I'll stand by it in certain circumstances.
If you are a consultant selling your services in respect of HAVS / WBV assessments then it is not going to make the grade - you are going to need a callibrated meter with the various clamp attachments.
If you are an SME though and cannot source valid data from one of the various databases - like in this case due to the age of the kit, then the Ipod app offers a useful indication.
You could use it to compare manufacturers figures against your own readings. You could attach it to the workpiece and check the vibration figure for feeding the workpiece - being careful not to grind it as you suggest Ron.
A vibration meter is an accelerometer - the Ipods and Iphones are packed with these so why not use the tech to obtain a guide figure?
The only drawback is the awkward shape of the ipod and attaching it to a tool. A workpiece would be easier I suspect.
Has to be better than relying purely on manufacturers data, surely?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I was going to back up Stevie40 here :)
I use my HTC desire (Ipods are a fashion accessory :) ) to give a rough idea for noise! (I even know of an inspector who has done the same!)
All I want to know is am I at 70dB or 90dB so I know if it's worth fetching the proper meter quickly.
All you want is an idea so you say short term we used the HSE guidaance and a worst case number, checked by taping the iphone to it and then arranged proper testing for next week!
So agree, DO NOT Rely on the data, do not try grinding it (although this may be a good thing) and make sure this is only an answer for today and that real data is obtained ASAP.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Stevie, do you have the name of the app, i'd like to take a look at it.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
As always, we can debate and agree to disagree!
The providers of these apps will freely admit that the techical specification of the ipod accelerometers and gyros in no way correlate with the required frequency response, bandwith filtering or weighting requirements of the ISO standards associated with HAV meters. Same applies to noise - entirely hit or miss.
The motion-sensor components in the ipod are provided for gaming purposes.
Not knocking the ipod devices, or the users, but in the grand scheme of things, these are essentially adult toys.
I had to giggle when someone showed me the spirit-level app!
You're right, not everyone can afford to buy HAVS meters. But you can hire them!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Never tried it before... But there is a product advert in SHP... price of £49.95 may be a better investment than the ipod app?
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.