Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
draiggoch  
#1 Posted : 22 November 2010 10:15:31(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
draiggoch

I was wondering if anybody can help me. We are building some serviced offices in a rural loctaion for small businesses to use. We shall have responsibility for the common areas and there will be a cafe on the groundfloor allowing access to the public to use the toilets in the common area. Now what i am not sure about is our responsibilty as landlord in terms of having staff on site at all times, we will have a manager but they have other duties and will be in for maybe a couple of hours a day. Then we have a caretaker at night. I am aware of all the risk assessments we have to do including fire and inspecting maintaining and so on it's just the staffing aspect that i have issues with. Anybody with experience of this? Thanks D.
Steve Sedgwick  
#2 Posted : 22 November 2010 10:34:43(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Steve Sedgwick

These are my initial thoughts. Basically your company has duties and responsibilities to the staff as the employer at all times in all areas; and for all other people under HASAWA sec 3, and Occupiers Liability Act in the common areas. The tenants have duties under the Occupiers Liability Act for the areas that they rent to ensure the safety of visitors, contractors and others inc your staff. Steve
draiggoch  
#3 Posted : 22 November 2010 10:39:35(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
draiggoch

Thanks for your reply Steve, the main part of my question was whether we need to man the site during all working hours or is a couple of hours presence enough?
Kate  
#4 Posted : 22 November 2010 11:03:43(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Kate

What would be the advantages of having someone permanently there?
draiggoch  
#5 Posted : 22 November 2010 11:15:16(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
draiggoch

Mainly in the event of a fire to take responsibility. My main problem is I cannot base this decision on a fire risk assessment since the centre is 6 months away from completion. I am trying to gather the information for staffing costs to aid the finance dept in working out service charges.
Steve Sedgwick  
#6 Posted : 22 November 2010 11:50:37(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Steve Sedgwick

D I would not anticipate that this new build would need you to provide someone there solely for Health Safety & Fire purposes for your tenants. But your tenants will probably have a requirement for Security / Reception to manage and control access. It is difficult to say without much more detail of to the premises and the commercial plan Steve
draiggoch  
#7 Posted : 22 November 2010 11:59:55(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
draiggoch

Steve, This is a community project to promote rural businesses, the front access is going to have a camera and audio system to let people in and the tenants will have to meet people to take them up to their office. I was happy with this until i was informed that the front access will be left unlocked to allow access to the cafe and toilets ( this also allows access to the offices). There was a receptionist originally planned but due to the electronics at the front door they decided to do without. This worries me on the security side of things especially in terms of arson. Thanks D.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.