Rank: Super forum user
|
We have an XRD machine that had a fault that needed clearing. To save the service engineer future visits he passed on the information on how to get into the maintenance mode and bypass the radiation interlocks so that we could clear the fault ourselves next time and save the cost of a visit.
I was astounded to discover that this had happened and that such information had been passed to someone (albeit very clever and sensible) who had no formal radiation training. The employee has now asked for a radiation leak detector to ensure safety.
Surely the service engineer has overstepped the mark here?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
m
you will have people appointed as Radiation Protection Advisor and Supervisor. You should let them know about this.
Steve
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
This is not necessarily a radiation exposure problem. The engineer was wrong to give you the access but is it really that dangerous? Are you actually exposed to radiation by doing this? If so what training does the engineer have and what procedures are required? Simply to reset the equipment after a fault has arisen is really quite simple to do, it is the identification of why the fault occurred in the first place is important. However, it changes nothing, was it a machine fault or a radiation issue, if the latter simply resetting the fault will not manage the issue, more competent assistance is required.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
In this kind of equipment, overriding the interlocks gives you the possibility of having the beam on and the shutter open while the door is open.
Whether you get exposed to radiation depends on where you place your hands and body. You can receive very nasty burns if you happen to be in the wrong place.
Steve Sedgwick's advice is very sound.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Depending upon the X-ray intensity you could also run the serious risk of cancer.
After all, 64 women die each year [statistically] from cancers caused by mammograms, and there is not-a-lot of radiation from them.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
The defeating of interlocks should be taken very seriously regardless of the hazard. Essentially this is the same as removing the fixed guard on a machine. Larger organisations operate interlock defeat procedures with formal process and approvals. Interlocks are fitted for good reason.
Advising somebody to do this smacks of a poor safety culture. Supposing the interlock was not reinstated correctly and somebody was exposed unnecessarily?
Kevin Drew
Radiation Protection Adviser
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.