Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Phillips20760  
#1 Posted : 17 December 2010 14:15:05(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Phillips20760

G'Day, Could I have your opinions on the following scenario: Landlord owns an industrial estate and lets yards & units out to various tenants. Who is responsible for gritting / ensuring the safety of pedestrian walkways and traffic routes? (with regards to snow / ice) To muddy the waters, what about shared walkways / routes. Regards, Ian
RayRapp  
#2 Posted : 18 December 2010 22:31:46(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
RayRapp

Ian With no responses thus far it indicates that this type of scenario has been discussed to death on these forums and that there is sometimes not a simple answer to a problem - hypothetical or otherwise. That said, employers have a statutory duty to ensure the safety of employees and others, which may include keeping walkways safe by clearing and gritting. There is also a civil law duty of care pursuant to common law and the Occupier's Liability Act to ensure the safety of premises. Who should be clearing/gritting will depend on who is deemed the 'occupier' and possibly other factors such as a terms in a tenancy. Best practice is to do what is reasonably practical to ensure the safety of everyone and to insulate the company form any liability - simples. Merry Xmas.
bob youel  
#3 Posted : 19 December 2010 11:51:53(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
bob youel

In my view irrespective of duties or otherwise what is happening these days is that most employers/landlords are taking the chance that they will not be enforced/prosecuted so they are not gritting and if a claim comes in they will look at it, the claim [not the gritting!] then and only then there are cases of companies doing their best only to lose court cases where others who never grit etc never get caught other than via a civil claim which does not go on their record is is usually cheap to pay [if they ever pay!] - good companies just cannot win just some thoughts
RayRapp  
#4 Posted : 20 December 2010 09:15:14(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
RayRapp

I take a slightly different view in that 'good companies' should be clearing and gritting paths for the safety of their employees and visitors. For example, I went to my local mini-mart and petrol station yesterday, no paths had been cleared of snow or gritted - it was a disgrace and an obvious danger. Worse, because of the conditions outside the floor inside was wet and very slippery. If a cleaner had left the surface like that then no doubt we would have seen 'wet/slippery floor' signs everywhere. Nothing would have given me greater pleasure than to witness an accident and help pursue a claim against this very well known supermarket company.
Phillips20760  
#5 Posted : 20 December 2010 09:59:22(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Phillips20760

Wasn't sure if it (specifically landlords duties) had been done to death or not - a quick search didn't find anything. We are occupying one of the units on the industrial estate so, as employer, we are gritting the walkways around this unit and this unit only. We are not touching walkways around letted units and leaving this to the individual tenants. Not sure if this is right or not hence the original post. We understand our duties as an employer, but not so clear as a landlord. Ian
Nikki-Napo  
#6 Posted : 20 December 2010 10:17:38(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Nikki-Napo

Personally I would grit if I was the business owner, but that is just me! Do the right thing, and your conscience (if nothing else) is clear. We had the misfortune to have to stop at motorway services (Tibshelf) the other week and it was a disgrace. The carpark hadn't been gritted or cleard. Cars wer skidding all over the place, and the exit was like a Toboggan run.
Murray18822  
#7 Posted : 20 December 2010 10:20:28(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Murray18822

My thoughts are that unless it is explicit in the tenancy agreements that the tenant is responsible for designated external areas then you as the landlord would be responsible. I comment as someone who used to undertake risk assessments for managing agents of such sites and they were responsible for external areas unless it was explicit that they weren't.
Nikki-Napo  
#8 Posted : 20 December 2010 10:21:05(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Nikki-Napo

I meant to add that doing the right thing is morally correct.
Invictus  
#9 Posted : 21 December 2010 08:05:03(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Invictus

If you can grit then grit, but it doesn't mean that an employer who hasn't gritted is negligent in anyway. A lot of local councils haven't gritted and didn't last year and people seem to get about without much injury but once they arrive at work appear to fall over. We had kept all paths clear (about a mile and a half in total, spending over £15.000 so far on grit. Friday it snowed heavily, no staff on site to enable gritting, Monday after the freezing temperatures we have been unable to do anything to clear the pathways although the people responsible have been clearing areas to allow people to walk around site. Just because there is snow and ice on the floor don't assume that the employer doesn't care, you have to have the labour force to enable the clearing of areas. Take extra care if you can see that the area hasn't ben cleared. 'Nothing would have given me greater pleasure than to witness an accident and help pursue a claim against this very well known supermarket company.' for me is a poor statement to make but then again I suppose that's the motivator for H&S.
RayRapp  
#10 Posted : 21 December 2010 08:40:48(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
RayRapp

Sometimes you deserve what you get.
Ken Slack  
#11 Posted : 21 December 2010 09:19:24(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ken Slack

farrell wrote:
A lot of local councils haven't gritted and didn't last year and people seem to get about without much injury
My wife works in the operating theatres at a large hospital an would like to disagree, hospitals are under alot of stress with record numbers of fractures and fall related injuries....
juls  
#12 Posted : 21 December 2010 09:44:05(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
juls

RayRapp wrote:
Sometimes you deserve what you get.
Surely Ray a better attitude would have been to do something about it and speak to the people at the supermarket about your concerns. Waiting for somebody to get injured goes against all I believe is my job as an H&S practitioner. Maybe your remark was just a flippant comment but I don't think it helps endear us as a profession to people out there.... Respectfully.
Invictus  
#13 Posted : 21 December 2010 09:53:20(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Invictus

Ken Slack wrote:
farrell wrote:
A lot of local councils haven't gritted and didn't last year and people seem to get about without much injury
My wife works in the operating theatres at a large hospital an would like to disagree, hospitals are under alot of stress with record numbers of fractures and fall related injuries....
I stand corrected, but I did mean in relation to the number of people still walking, driving around etc. Then again I sat in a hospital last week when I heard two people who said I don't bother with a Dr. I always just come here. So maybe some of them don't need to be there.
RayRapp  
#14 Posted : 21 December 2010 18:03:57(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
RayRapp

juls, it's a fair point and yes, I was being a bit flippant. However, I don't believe anyone would have taken notice of me or appreciated my interventions. I'm sure up and down the country there are many similar scenarios.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.