Rank: Forum user
|
Happy new year to everyone.
We were visited by the HSE a few weeks ago, and during the visit one of our employees decided it would be ‘helpful’ to act as a banksman for one of our delivery drivers…by standing less than 2 foot away on an icy surface to a vehicle that could not see him. Total lack of common sense. The HSE Inspector asked him to move away and noted it down and suggested we arranged for some training.
One of our Management Team has since asked me to query this. What if the scenario was as follows…?
The Manager came in at 7am to find a delivery driver reversing. He took it upon himself, without any training, to assist the driver reverse into position. Is this acceptable?
If not, do we then identify a certain number of operatives to get trained as a banksman and only they are allowed to act as one. Is this acceptable?
Where do we stand?
Look forward to receiving replies.
Cheers.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
I would suggest that your company puts some employees through a competency / training course. Should a serious incident occur and an investigation needed then operative training/competency will be looked into the same as if an operative had an accident whilst driving a machine like a FLT (were they trained to do so etc).
Once operatives/employees trained then yes they would be only ones allowed to bank vehicles as required, obviously making sure that there is enough cover in case of illness, holidays etc.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Do you need a Banksman? Carry out a Risk Assessment (or traffic management plan) of the reversing activities on site, look at the reversing area, frequency, time of day, how many people in the area, near misses etc and look at the risk of having no banksman to having one.
If the area is small or there are space constraints it may not be advisable to have one as there maybe no safe place for them to stand.
Si
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
I agree with Mr Flibble do you really need a banksman , have you got a current traffic management plan in place and risk assessment , also you should run through the hierarchy of controls first looking at one way systems turning circles to avoid the need for reversing . If this cannot be achieved then you should implement trained competent banksmen with regular briefing to all the workforce and drivers
Hope this helps
Chris
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
We had a similar situation a few years ago as our yard is one way in and way out, so there was a need. We used RoSPA as they had a Banksman course which they altered to fit our situation and site, as a result we now use Banksman more frequently knowing they have the right skills, but it was part of a larger project which included traffic lights, restriction of staff in the yard, allocated drop off points etc etc
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I believe that the new term is 'reversing assistant' where the only activity is reversing vehicles etc as a banksman is for more in-depth, risky and complicated areas
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Yes Bob, that is correct!
I would suggest anyone in construction who requires a banksman’s course to contact CSkills and locate a provider.
For reversing vehicles a traffic management course should be sought.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
EyeSee,
I think (like other posters) that you need to decide if you do actually require someone to assist reversing vehicles.
I would ask the people who work in the area if there is a problem and if so if they have any ideas to help.
Whatever you decide should be reflected in your safety documentation (risk assessments, traffic management plan, safety arrangements or whatever you have).
When you have decided I would then put out a safety notice saying either nobody should help reversing or Mr Jones, Mr Smith, Miss White etc are the only employees trained and authorised to assist in reversing vehicles.
Review your decision periodically as a normal RA.
When I worked in a container terminal we had 3000 + vehicles a day reversing into a line of 9 bays each with 5 lanes loading and unloading containers. We did not provide any kind of reversing help but as a traffic management issue all vehicles drove on the right hand side once they entered the terminal. Drivers were required to stand in designated safe areas whilst loading & unloading was taking place.
We never had a problem with reversing using this solution.
Take Care
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
My employer is about to use the RoSPA training system, but I was trained by the Road Haulage Association a few years back & can also recommend their course. It's simple but effective & until the new course is implemented nationally by my employer, I intend to deliver the RHA course as required.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Eyesee, if you want to do something other than that advised by the HSE Inspector then I would ring them and discuss it; but its pointless asking the HSE if untrained managers can act as banksmen as this would cause the inspector even more concern.
Banksman training is not complicated and can be done in-house with a good trainer who understands the site and its transport operations and its particular risks.
here are some good banksman training slides
http://www.kettering.gov...raining_presentation.pdf
Also consider the drivers; few drivers are trained in the correct banksman signals and we may have drivers from all over the globe.
Steve
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Some very helpful advice here, thanks everyone.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I have acted as a banksman or assisting a vehicle if you prefer, on many occasions and without any formal training! Even though we do have trained banksmen they are not always available on a large site at any given time. Surely, it is better to assist a driver than to ignore the situation. Indeed, I did it today and the HGV in question had nothing to do with our company. Whatever happened to 'sensible h&s management'?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
In spite of the Kettering slides I have to say that reversing of vehicles is carried out by the experts, ie the armed forces and airports, from the front of the vehicle. It is far easier to see somebody in front of you BUT drivers are not used to this and training is far mre intensive. The assertion that the driver is ultimately responsible is certainly true on the public highway But on site? Not so sure. Certainly the driver must stop if he is not confident of where he/she is or going in a similar manner a crane driver has the ultimate duty to ensure the crane is safe in use.
The catch 22 in the HSE note is that the issueing of an RA that demonstrates the need for signalling training is tantamount to an admission of an inadequate RA
Bob
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
I would be careful with introducing banksmen (or reversing assistants if you prefer). It does require training and is a skill in itself, so not everyone will have the ability required. It may appear that the Inspector was concerned about the combination of moving vehicles and people in the same location at the same time. In my experience, most drivers will ignore signals from teh ground and use their own skills anyway as it is they that will have to answer questions if their vehicle is damaged!
In some areas (e.g HGVs loading onto a Ferry) Banksmen are used and will push in a drivers' mirrors to prevent him from ignoring their instructions. This is because a Banksman has responsibility for a vehicle he is directing and this raises the question of frequency. If you train and employ banksmen, they must control EVERY vehicle movement and so must be available at all times. If you have a lot of vehicle movement, this is a full time job!
As has already been mentioned, what you may need is better traffic control system; prevent people and moving vehicles interacting and let the drivers drive themselves.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I believe the HSE identified sometime ago that a large number of people were being killed or seriously injured whilst as a banksman. This resulted in them advising that their use should be avoided wherever possible.
From a risk perspective, the use of a banksman puts someone's life in danger to avoid damage to vehicles, buildings etc. Justifying that is going to be difficult.
Whilst the Kettering presentation includes some useful information, I fairly horrified that it runs to 50 slides, approximately half of which are purely text. Without wishing to be disrespectful to anyone, I would expect a significant proportion of the people likely to receive the training would lack the necessary literacy skills to understand the slides.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
But aren't these slides about par for amny courses we see - a lot of padding waffle and seemingly little real skill giving - I can't see any evidence for genuine practical work and testing (pass/fail) in all of it.
Yes I agree reversing signallers placed at the rear is High Risk - so why not place them at the front?
Bob
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.