Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
SBH  
#1 Posted : 11 January 2011 09:09:59(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
SBH

Due to the economic climate would you pay to have fire blankets where there are only toasters and microwaves in small pantries. Plus would ypu have them checked out annually or every two years SBH
S Gibson  
#2 Posted : 11 January 2011 09:20:49(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
S Gibson

I would have thought fire blankets would be required in kitchens with open ranges etc, but with just a toaster/microwave you can simply unplug and have afire extinguisher co2 in the vicinity
Andrew W Walker  
#3 Posted : 11 January 2011 09:21:09(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Andrew W Walker

Yes, I would. Also, check with your insurance company as they may have an opinion on this, ours have, they "recommend" that we have a fire blanket. As for checks; we have ours done annually with all of the fire extinguishers.
Guitarman1  
#4 Posted : 11 January 2011 09:40:32(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Guitarman1

Isn't this down to a suitable and sufficient risk assessment? Why have a fire blanket when you are unlikely to have a class of fire that requires it? It's a bit like having a can of diesel in the boot of your petrol car. A suitable fire risk assessment would highlight the types of extinguishers for the classes of fires you are likely to have... I think
kevbell  
#5 Posted : 11 January 2011 09:50:34(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
kevbell

Our insurance company wanted fire blankets as well ,but make sure if you put in any extinguishers you check and record monthly as well as annually this is something the fire inspector will look out for Kev
Murray18822  
#6 Posted : 11 January 2011 11:17:12(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Murray18822

It's worth keeping a check on what your insurer requires as my experience is that it can be excessive and offer little in the way of prevention or control. You shouldn't be afraid to question their requirements or recommendations but be prepared to explain your rationale.
Andrew W Walker  
#7 Posted : 11 January 2011 11:41:29(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Andrew W Walker

The problem we had with our insurance company was the fact that the previous warehouse had an "incident involving a fire". (This was before I joined the company!) I do recall the fire, as it was about half a mile from where I live and I could see the smoke. So some of the recommendations they make now are more like conditions. Understandable really. For the most part insurer's will listen to any reasonable argument.
Bob Shillabeer  
#8 Posted : 11 January 2011 13:57:04(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Bob Shillabeer

It is common practice to have a fire blanket in all kitchen areas irrespective of what equipment is made available. But, the supply of such equipment is not the only thing you need to take account of have you considered staff training?
firesafety101  
#9 Posted : 11 January 2011 14:31:03(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

Think about - if you were starting from scratch what fire appliances would you require? If there is a chip range or similar then you need to smother the fire with a lid or blanket and a foam extinguisher. If not you don't need a blanket.
Ciaran Delaney  
#10 Posted : 11 January 2011 14:51:37(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ciaran Delaney

Remember the key point, training. Chris, are you talking about a chip range in a chip shop?
firesafety101  
#11 Posted : 11 January 2011 14:59:14(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

A range in a chippy would be quite large and potentially too big a fire for a single fire blanket used by a single person. They do have lids that can be closed but usually by reaching over the fire to get to the lid. My advice would be to close the lid if safe to do so, sound the alarm ensure evacuation, including the flat above if there is one and it is occupied, call the brigade, then if safe to do so and you are trained have a go at the fire using a foam extinguisher but there will have to be at least two of you to do that. How does that sound, no mention of the blanket there? I have fought fires in chip ranges using foam extinguishers - you have to be ready for the fire to initially hit the ceiling with intense heat coming out of the range as soon as the foam is applied. Not something for the uninitiated.
Ciaran Delaney  
#12 Posted : 11 January 2011 15:08:11(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ciaran Delaney

Chris, I would advise a wet chemical extinguisher for dealing with chip fat fires in a commercial setting.
Invictus  
#13 Posted : 11 January 2011 15:12:41(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Invictus

A fire blanket is reasonably cheap, of course you have the training, but what would it cost if you had a fire, increased insurance premiums, renewing the items, repairs to the building etc.
Ciaran Delaney  
#14 Posted : 11 January 2011 15:15:54(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ciaran Delaney

Hi farrell, I agree that a fire blanket is cheap but there is no logical reason for a fire blanket where there is only a toaster and microwave. I would spec a CO2 fire extinguisher and turn off the power when safe to do so.
Thundercliffe26308  
#15 Posted : 11 January 2011 15:20:56(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Thundercliffe26308

...the question was regarding a toaster and microwave....ensure they are CE compliant have them PAT tested...... the fire risk assessment should signpost the requirements, Co2/Foam take your pick SBH
Heather Collins  
#16 Posted : 11 January 2011 15:23:26(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Heather Collins

To answer the original question. I would not pay to have fire blankets in such a situation if there is no actual "cooking" beyond toaster and microwave. If I already had the blankets and was not going to dispose of them I would pay to have them checked as part of the annual fire extinguisher check.
smurray06  
#17 Posted : 11 January 2011 15:37:13(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
smurray06

we have a very small canteen and i had our local fire brigade officer come in to check our site [free] and his thoughts where better to have one than not, and we have it inspected every year and record it as part of our monthly checks as well
firesafety101  
#18 Posted : 11 January 2011 15:40:19(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

Ciaran Delaney wrote:
Chris, I would advise a wet chemical extinguisher for dealing with chip fat fires in a commercial setting.
Wet chemical foam? Thanks Ciaran
Ciaran Delaney  
#19 Posted : 11 January 2011 15:42:46(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ciaran Delaney

Never ever use Foam on an electrical fire.
SBH  
#20 Posted : 11 January 2011 15:45:29(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
SBH

We have 150 blankets large premises, so obviously I am trying to reduce costs. Again only toasters and microwaves ... my thoughts were to leave them in but inspect them ourselves. SBH
firesafety101  
#21 Posted : 11 January 2011 15:46:02(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

I was just wondering what the competence requirements are for checking a fire blanket? If it is unused and still in its original holder, why not remove it, open it out and inspect for damage, deterioration etc. Fold it up again and replace it holder. Put a date on the holder - job done. If it looks good then it probably is good. No cost.
Invictus  
#22 Posted : 11 January 2011 20:47:23(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Invictus

Ciaran Delaney wrote:
Hi farrell, I agree that a fire blanket is cheap but there is no logical reason for a fire blanket where there is only a toaster and microwave. I would spec a CO2 fire extinguisher and turn off the power when safe to do so.
I was taking the fact that they already have them as being a cheap alternative to a fire. I agree that there are other extinguishers better suited, good management is better still, ensuring that the equipment is switched off after use, not leaving the toast or food when making it, ensuring that it is not near any other sources of fuel etc. Reviewing the R/A would assist in making the decision.
Canopener  
#23 Posted : 11 January 2011 21:15:43(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Canopener

A couple of things. a. I thought that the term 'electrical fire' was considered a 'misnomer'. While I wouldn't advocate using 'foam' on electrical equipment (although if switched off go for it!), I have it in my mind that AFFF is rated for accidental release on electrical fires - could anyone confirm or otherwise? b. If a fire blanket has an intact seal, what is the value of an annual check, other than to line the pockets of the company checking them? Do they deteriorate substantially when in storage? I am wondering if the act of getting it out, fiddling with it and then folding it back up etc may possibly be counterproductive and actually cause damage and deterioration. Happy to be wrong, corrected or hung drawn and quartered!
firesafety101  
#24 Posted : 11 January 2011 21:33:38(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

Be careful advising use of other than CO2 for electrical apparatus fires even when switched off. Some equipment stores electricity so don't use water or foam on electrical.
Whitfield28132  
#25 Posted : 11 January 2011 21:59:34(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
Whitfield28132

Is it just me who challenges insurers? I have been told on a few occasions by insurers that they require changes to be implemented for one reason or another. However, when challenged and given valid reasons for not doing so they usually agree and let it go. The requirement for fire blankets should, as has been said previously, come from the Fire Risk Assessment, and if you can show them a good and valid reason for not requiring a blanket (i.e. no chip pans etc) then they will usually agree with you. I guess the message i'm trying to convey is... Dont just accept what they say, challenge it with good common sense reasoning and ask them if they agree. You may be suprised.
Thundercliffe26308  
#26 Posted : 12 January 2011 09:11:22(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Thundercliffe26308

...not wishing to get into a disagreement with any one...I have just been with a senior fire officer for two days sorting out various locations with fire appliances...and he stated that there is no such thing as an electical fire...only eletrical equipment on fire and AFFF can be used to put out the fire.....and in response to fire risk assessmnet you can determine that no one attempts to extinguish the fire just evacuate the premises and call 999
Jane Blunt  
#27 Posted : 12 January 2011 09:27:05(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Jane Blunt

Thundercliffe26308 wrote:
...not wishing to get into a disagreement with any one...I have just been with a senior fire officer for two days sorting out various locations with fire appliances...and he stated that there is no such thing as an electical fire...only eletrical equipment on fire and AFFF can be used to put out the fire.....and in response to fire risk assessmnet you can determine that no one attempts to extinguish the fire just evacuate the premises and call 999
He has not really thought this one through. While electricity is not fire, you can either have fire within electrical apparatus itself or fire where the insulation of electrical conductors is compromised, giving rise to a risk of electric shock - such as when the conduit on the wall melts exposing more than one phase!! Since this is quite a mouthful, I 9personally) am happy to compromise by saying 'electrical fire' even if it is not 100% scientifically sound. While you do have the option to evacuate the premises and call 999, there is a lot to be said for having a few people around who can take immediate action to halt a small fire. One of our buildings would have been lost if someone had not done just that, and the major part of an Architecture Department at a Dutch University was lost because no-one dealt with a coffee machine that was on fire. This is not the same as fire fighting - it is equivalent to stamping on the ember that exits from your open fire onto the carpet!
Thundercliffe26308  
#28 Posted : 12 January 2011 10:13:21(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Thundercliffe26308

....such as when the conduit on the wall melts exposing more than one phase...(jane blunt) I will stick with the advise we recived and ......Why would expect anyone to be in a premises fighting a fire that has enough heat to melt conduit..
firesafety101  
#29 Posted : 12 January 2011 10:33:44(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

I watched a TV programme the other night, someone was trying to define one degree temperature. They said there was no such thing as heat because heat is just energy. Try sticking that in the fire officer's pipe and tell him to smoke it?
Haines40637  
#30 Posted : 12 January 2011 11:07:19(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Haines40637

Reading the threads lets be clear on this.............you never should use a standard extinguisher even foam on a chip pan/range fire involving cooking oil, you will cause an eruption or spread of fire. The only extinguishing agent that can be used safely is the Class F wet chemical extinguisher or fixed system inside hood which delivers a special foam agent from an extended wand gently onto the surface of the oil and forms a sealing layer. The best method would normally be to smother it with the lid closure or blanket, as training in the above technique is not easily set up. I would always advocate having a fire blanket in a small kitchenette as described as if it is in a toaster or microwave and you've turned the power off put it out with a CO2, the item will still be hot with potential to re-ignite. By placing a blanket over the item after extinguishing the fire this can help to prevent re-ignition and allow the item to cool safely whilst you wait for the brigade etc. In addition one of the fire blanket's other main uses is to smother a clothing fire ok probably unlikely in this case but don't discount someone leaving the tea towel over the toaster!!!
Canopener  
#31 Posted : 12 January 2011 20:45:34(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Canopener

Thundercliffe, I have some sympathy with your post at #26 and hence my post at #23 in with I suggested that an 'electrical fire' was something of a misnomer. Some years ago the RAF had a change of position, much as you have described, and 'electrical fires' were 'no more'. Their revised approach was knock off the power and treat as (in the main) a solid fire. Right now where's my BCF?
messyshaw  
#32 Posted : 13 January 2011 05:12:28(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
messyshaw

Why not call this room/space a 'snack preparation area' (not kitchen as there's no oven or hob) has a microwave and toaster (and presumably some method of supplying hot water). As soon as you mention the word kitchen, inspecting officers & insurance companies get a little panicky Forget the FRA, forget the definition of electrical fire and any basic nonsence connected with semantics:- 1) What is your recommended method of dealing with a fire in such an appliance (toaster or microwave)? 2) Would you ever advise using a blanket on a microwave or toaster fire?? If your answer to (2) is No - why even have a fire blanket in the snack area?? An FRA is all about applying common sense and not - as some insurance companies and fire inspecting officers would have it - applying guidance or benchmark standards in a prescriptive manner
Jon B  
#33 Posted : 13 January 2011 13:32:08(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Guest

Looking at the OP, my view would be: 1. If a FRA has deemed the blankets necessary then the current economic climate should have little to do with it. (But the original FRA could be flawed, influenced by other factors like insurers 'recomendations'). Personally I think there is a reasonable arguement for not having them if other suiatable means are available. Toasters and microwaves are just another appliance that may catch fire. You don't need a fire blanket for hairs dryers, tV's or computers so unless there was a 'chip pan' scenario or even a gas hob (clothing fire!). 2. If they are there then they must be maintained. I do not believe RR(FS)O is prescriptive in the inspection interval but I would say the 'best practice' is annually to BS5306 (though I am not sure is the standard itself states an annual service). 3. In house testing may be appropriate so long as you have the competence (I don't know if it as straight forward as taking it out an looking at it - I am sure someone knows). There was an earlier post (last week or so) which mentioned in house testing and the fire technicians course (run by BFC I recall). I am assuming this covers blankets also. 4. We currently pay around £3 per item inspected on all our portable extinguishers (not counting recharges / exchanges etc) so with the course at £625 and you having 150 blankets you could expect payback within 2 years and be able to in house service all your other extinguishers to boot. Hope this helps
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.