Rank: Guest
|
A construction site visited by an unannounced HSE Inspector - first wants to see the welfare facilities. In the toilets asks where the workforce wash their hands; in the sink provided. Fine said the female inspector.
In the rest room asks what the sink is for - washing hands after coming off site answered the site manger.
Next where do the workforce wash their utensils after eating - in the same sink. Not right said the Inspector provide a separate sink.
Now said the inspector where would someone wash their salad stuff before eating. No sink - provide another one.
So this welfare facility had 4 sinks. To recap:
One for the toilets One to wash hands in the rest room One to wash utensils in the rest room One to wash salad etc in the rest room
You think I'm joking? Definitely not. (O, and practically all sites (loads) I have visited or worked on have only ever had two sinks (one in the toilet and one in the rest room).
Comments please particularly if you consider this to be OTT and/or just jobsworth and what if anything would your response have been. I'm also sure HSE Inspectors must read this forum so comments from them would also be appreciated (if they dare to identify themselves)
Rich
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Well - the HSE inspector may not always be right but she is always the HSE Inspector.
IMHO OTT as far as washing salad goes, you can buy pre washed salad.
I do agree one for washing hands in the toilet area and one for dishes in the sink.
Another one for hand washing in the rest room? Why not wash hands in the toilet area of not too far from the rest room?
This is a good one for me as I have issues with welfare on site.
|
|
|
|
Rank: New forum user
|
Me thinks she is being a wee bit OTT. She is correct in stating that separate sinks are required for preparing food and washing up. The toilet sink must be large enough to wash hands and elbows. In all my days on sites I have only ever seen a couple of sinks in the wc room and two sinks in the canteen room--separate units.
Maybe worthwhile checking on the HSE website regarding Welfare facilities on site and even check the CDM regs.
Hope this helps Ally
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Just had a think about this and conclude that someone has shot themselves in the foot.
First question was answered correctly.
Second question should have been answered differently and not stated hand washing.
If all hand washing is done in the toilet area then that releases the rest room for washing dishes and preparing food.
Organise two bowls, one each for dishes and food, provide colander etc. for preparing salad etc.
At most two sinks in the rest room and one in toilet area.
Do you have separate toilets on site male and female? If not I would be surprised she did not require separate as she was on site?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Rich please keep us informed and what have you done about her demands? Was she acceptable to a discussion?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
ChrisBurns wrote: Do you have separate toilets on site male and female?
It's not a regulation to have seperate toilets, Chris. Mixed toilets are acceptable so long as they are able to be locked from the inside. (We don't want any women having a sneaky look) :-)
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Chris - the outcome was that the site manager bowed to the inevitable after the Inspector refused to relent. And no she did not even mention separate toilets for males and females and indeed she didn't even bother to inspect the rest of the site.
The extra sinks were installed and she came back to check.
Rich
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Presumably an unannounced visit? ;-) oops
A separate sink for washing salad, crikey building sites have changed, what happened to the out of date Ginsters pasty and the curly sandwiches made by Mum the night before? I can't help but feel that she may have been being a little zealous!!!!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
frankc wrote:ChrisBurns wrote: Do you have separate toilets on site male and female?
It's not a regulation to have seperate toilets, Chris. Mixed toilets are acceptable so long as they are able to be locked from the inside. (We don't want any women having a sneaky look) :-) I take your point Frank but what if its a small site, small number os workers, with only one toilet? Once a female is present surely a secong loo is required.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
ChrisBurns wrote: I take your point Frank but what if its a small site, small number os workers, with only one toilet? Once a female is present surely a secong loo is required.
http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/indg293.pdfCheck the above link out, Chris. Seperate toilets if you can, locked from the inside is acceptable if not.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
General comment on welfare:
Why is it OK [generally] for CDM, agriculture & similar to have poor to very poor welfare facilities yet office staff [generally], even in the same companies [and sometimes on the same job!], have good welfare facilities
It took many years of hard work to get to a good general standard in the UK but we are now dropping back and losing all that we have accomplished. Additionally many many companies throughout the UK have been prosecuted for not having adequate sinks so food etc can be enjoyed properly so why should it be so different on a CDM site?
My comments have been made via my own experience where I have worked on site in many countries [abet the last time ~15 years ago in Europe] and in my experience it was always the English in particular who had the poorest welfare facilities for their staff. Hence I and many others worked for the Dutch etc as against the English on the same jobs!
Good facilities can be had on all [I include very small jobs] sites - Its all down to the site manager in one hand; as if they insist on cleanliness it will be clean, as I have done on my jobs, and on the other hand its down to the negotiations pre work between the client & contractor noting that in many cases the client pays for good welfare only to find that the subbie does not provide it!
We should all be fighting for good welfare facilities at all times as even on a small job you can be clean!
As for the HSE; well enough said!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
...mmm cant wait to get on the site ..washing salad ? wot ever next Jamie on to do his 30min meals
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
One washbasin in toilet for washing hands after using toilet One sink in rest room for cleaning utensils and preparing food Separate washbasin in rest room for hand washing for those working with food.
Water should be lukewarm for hand washing. Proper provision for hand drying is also needed.
Separate washbasin for salad is not needed and will not be found in most commercial kitchens.
More importantly - how are you going to ensure that those using the toilet do actually also use the washbasin?
Chris
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Rich, the number of workers is of a lesser consideration than the nature of the work. Current CIS sheets for welfare suggest washing facilities at toilets and at changing facilities - as opposed to the place where people prepare and eat food.
The key issue here is surely that your people are provided with adequate facilities such that the place they eat and drink is essentially free from work contaminants - the required approach then would be dependent on the nature of the work on your site.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
I would have refused the HSE inspectors request and ask for documented evidence that 4 separate sinks are required for a rest facility.
A commercial kitchen or a canteen serving prepared food would be a different kettle of fish to a bothy on a building site.
In reference to Bobs point, I have seen many offices with much worse welfare facilities than that of a building site including HSE offices. The vast majority of small offices and retail premises I visit are lucky to have a dedicated staff rest room never mind 4 separate use sinks.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Remember that the ethos of the HSE regarding construction welfare is that people working there should have as good a standard as anywhere else, and that in many instances a greater degree of diligent provision is required in order to avoid cross-contamination.
They are trying very hard to sell a culture-shift to the industry.
I would personally like to see some of the issues of non-compliance taken directly back to the commissioning client -who has specific duty under CDM. As with many aspects of construction non-compliance, the Contractor usually gets it in the neck. I do wish the HSE would spend as much time with the client, ultimately it is the client who will drive improvement.
I agree too that provision in many shops and SMEs is often no better.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
One of the problems was IMHO the HSE I was told one of the sinks in the rest area was for washing hands.
I will be setting up a welfare cabin next week and will ensure two sinks in the rest cabin and one in the toilet cabin.
I will place notices at each sink as follows:
This sink for hand washing (toilet cabin) This sink for dish washing only (rest area) This sink for food preparation only (rest area)
Another in the rest area - No hand washing here do that in the toilet cabin).
Maybe another in the toilet cabin - Wash hands etc. as no hand wash in rest area.
Not expensive or too much extra work and should make the point.
Comments appreciated.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Ron I worked on builing sites for over 25 years and things have changed a lot in that time ,they still have a long way to go ,but this type of inspection is not what is needed in my 25 years on site not one salad was washed ,so come on . Yes welfare facilities should be as good on site as off site but this type of inspection does nothing to help the culture-shift Kev
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I was wondering how this kind of inspection and pressure on management to provide salad washing facilities is of any help in improving the safety culture shift between workforce and management.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Kev, I'm steering welll clear of the "salad" bit of this discussion. With all due respect, this may be somewhat out of context with the Inspector's overall intentions.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
I too worked on construction sites for many years and am happy that facilities are improving.
However what I find surprising is that a HSE inspector visits a construction site and only inspects the washing facilities?
Surely any inspector should also look at the whole site? It seems to me that she could of and probably did miss something far more important then providing a sink for washing salad!
No wonder the HSE is losing respect among H&S professionals.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Ron you may well be right ,but you can see my point it is tuff in any industry to change peoples attiude to H&S .I am now in the care industry and `the we fear change brigade' are alive and well and working here,we all have to try and do our bit to influance what every job we work in and some time inspectors can ruin months of hard work with one over keen report or comment in front of the wrong people Kev
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Agreed Kev. I've also had issues with unfortunate choice of words to employee groups during these interventions.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Perhaps the reason for only inspecting the welfare facilities was a complaint, anonymous or otherwise. If so, Inspector standards deteriorating further unless Inspector not worried about management suspecting workforce complaint.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Or it could be that HSE are starting a blitz on welfare on construction sites. They do that without warning.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
May be being a bit pedantic here but it is important to draw the distinction between wash hand basins - for personal hygiene and sinks - for washing up /washing food etc. I would expect to see whb's in WC facilities and in any room used for food production - this for the prevention of cross contamination. Sinks for other uses related to the provision of refreshments should be provided further to risk assessing the need and the type and extent of refreshment provision. I would expect (and not being at all conversant with construction) that rest areas would generally be provided for employees to heat up food/make drinks and would be very surprised if "dirty" salad/vegetable washing facilities were necessary - in a production kitchen Yes.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
frankc wrote:ChrisBurns wrote: I take your point Frank but what if its a small site, small number os workers, with only one toilet? Once a female is present surely a secong loo is required.
http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/indg293.pdfCheck the above link out, Chris. Seperate toilets if you can, locked from the inside is acceptable if not. That document has two tables for toilet numbers, the table for mixed use (or women only) starts at 1-5 people 1 toilet, 6-25 2 toilets etc. Table 2 (men only) starts at 1-15 1 toilet, 16-30 2 toilets and 1 urinal etc. You see there is a need for more than one toilet with women on site, and you will usually get 6 or more on site. Funny how table one shows number of toilets and washbasins where table 2 shows number of toilets and urinals. (not wash basins). What are we to gather from that I wonder?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
I've not had a huge amount of construction experience and hate to be sterotypical but the average contractor will probably bring butties or a pasty / last nights tea to warm up in microwave, not bring in a lettuce, cucumber and tomatoes to slice, dice and dress with salad cream.
The welfare regs are I think vague in what is acceptable, there is only an implication that additional sinks 'may' be required 'Good hygiene standards should be maintained in those parts of rest facilities used for eating and preparing food and drinks'. Given the general cleaniliness of many restrooms I have seen (not construction) I'd says the 'cleaning' issue is more important that seperate facilities.
If the toilets are near by then there is not necessarily a need for a seperate hand wash basin in the rest room. A 'Now wash your hands' policy would work though the 'extra' basin would facilitate it. A sink for filling the kettle, washing your mug, pots and cultlery etc should then suffice.
If of course you have a top notch employer providing an all singing all dancing site kitchen then you may have to go the extra mile. Likewise other standards or regulations may apply where 'true' food preparation is carried out like canteens, or catering industries etc. I do recall a similar post a few years ago where some significnat distinction was drawn between the welfare regs and other 'food hygiene' regs.
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.