IOSH forums home
»
Our public forums
»
OSH discussion forum
»
RPE manufacturers instruction v risk assessment
Rank: Guest
|
We have a slight difference of opinion a I would like others people opinions so as to get a more balanced view.
Some of our employees (laboratory workers) are exposed to petroleum spirit vapours. We are well below the WEL but employees were still experiencing effects (slight dizziness) during a short term exposure. We use half mask respirators with an AX filter to control this residual risk.
The PPE regs state ' Maunfacturers maintenance schedules and instructions should be followed.........any significant deviation should be discussed beforehand with the manufacturer...' The Manufacturers advice is not to use for more than one (8 hour)shift, even though the mask is only used for 15 minutes.
It has been suggested that we do not need to follow this instruction as the exposure is short and low and that we could re-use for upto 1 month.
Your views would be appreciated
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
A little hard work reading through your post but I think I get it now.
You are wanting to re-use the masks for up to 8 hours in total, in 15 minute segments, am I right?
You say the manufacturer should be contacted and talked to re a deviation - why not do just that? Surely it will not cost anything and may provide the guidance you want and in your favour however if they say otherwise it will be "from the horses mouth".
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
I’m not familiar with AX filters, but it’s entirely possible that the filter is affected by, for instance, atmospheric moisture that will rapidly degrade its function once unsealed.
Also, just curiosity, how have you established exposure is well under the WEL?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
If you are a manufacturer U should be using LEV as against RPE in the first place for day to day chemical experimentation etc areas!
And the law is first before instructions from manufacturers etc and proper risk assessment should answer your questions as there may be more than 1 factor at work
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
AX filters are not filters, they are absorbents of low molecular weight organics. The reason their short lifetime is that the absorbed materials diffuse throughout the bed even on standing. This in turn means that the next time the cartridge is used, the first breath starts to desorb the organics into the wearers lungs.
However, if you use the AX cartridge as a back up to LEV and actual exposure to the organics is tending towards zero, our supplier has agreed that the cartridges ARE reusable but must be changed as soon as they are exposed.
Hope that makes sense, pm if I can help further
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Chris - Yes you have it about right, The filters (Its a cartridge as ians points out) are designed for a single 8 hour shift but our exposure is of low level and short duration. I have already contacted the maunfacturer and they will not deviate from the recommendation to use for no more than one shift even if its only 15 minutes.
KD - Exposure has been measured by monitoring (personal diffusion badge)
Bob - We are using LEV, the RPE is to protect against residual risk, specifically because despite the low levels (most is removed by LEV) people are still experiencing symptoms therefore further control is necessary. It not RP to upgrade the LEV though its possible in the future as we expand the operation.
KD has a point about how the filter may be affected but there is also the manufacturers vested interest in selling us up to 20 cartridges a month insted of 1-2 and at over £5 each thats big difference.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Jon, our supplier has asked the question of 3 manufacturers all of whom said our approach was correct and one even put that in writing. The trick is to ensure there is no exposure to materials with boiling points of 65°C or lower.
We have very efficient LEV in place and the AX cartridges are a back up in case there is an unscheduled release. We also have continuous instrumental measurement of the concentration in the atmosphere so the chemists know when there has been exposure and to discard the cartridges.
|
|
|
|
IOSH forums home
»
Our public forums
»
OSH discussion forum
»
RPE manufacturers instruction v risk assessment
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.