Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Dixon36769  
#1 Posted : 23 January 2011 10:32:19(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
Dixon36769

Hi all Can anyone clear this up for me with a point in the direction of legislation if possible. During my site inspection I noticed that pre cast concrete units that will be installed to form part of a bridge had "Lifting pins" cast into concrete units. On questioning the Site Manager for valid test certification for the "Lifting pins" he replied that the "Lifting pins" were part of the load and would normally come under his PUWER regime rather than LOLER. I found it strange that we require test certification for the ground that the crane (used to lift the units into place) will sit on, the crane , lifting chains & lifting clutch but not for the item that they are ALL connected to. Further inspection of the concrete units QA documentation only identified that the "Lifting pins" were located as per the design on the construction drawing. QA documentation was also available for the actual "Lifting pins" from the supplier. Further investigation required me to contact the concrete unit supplier to enquire if they tested the "Lifting pins" after casting and before the units left the factory. Their reply was that the "Lifting pins" are installed in line with the manufacturers installation instructions and there is no requirement for them to be tested. My thoughts are, should there be any human error when installing the lifting pins (e.g. air pocket around the pin(s) there is a potential for the pins to be pulled out of the concrete unit as it is being lifted into position, this may then introduce shock load onto the crane. No one else seems concerned: with replies like "its been alright till now" or "nothings never happened before" I am starting to think that maybe I am making a mountain out of a mole hill. I welcome any thoughts,advice & guidance
up north  
#2 Posted : 23 January 2011 12:10:44(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
up north

with regards to pre-fab concrete, I have had some experience of lifting pins being loose and potentially failing during lifting operations. I must also add that it does not happen very often and is usually a result of installation error at the factory(inadequate ties to the rebar). fortunately the loose pins where identified by a first class slinger signaller imediately before lifting into place, they had been lifted at the factory for handling and loading purposes. I would agree that they form part of the load, there fore not a lifting attachement under loler, simmilar to the lifting lugs on a skip, but should still be adequate under PUWER check to see if the manufacturer specifies a pull test in his QA proceedures this will test the integrity of the fixing and surrounding concrete. this technology is available and in use on the sites(scaffold ties for example) so should not be much of a problem to arrange for some random samples. hope this helps
Darach  
#3 Posted : 23 January 2011 21:27:58(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Darach

Hi, I too have heard stories of lifting pins or swift lifts failing, so reckon you are right there with the introduction of testing. The cost would be minimal for the manufacturer.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.