Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
mootoppers  
#1 Posted : 28 March 2011 15:09:20(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
mootoppers

Hi All

Can anybody tell me what is the allowable height for a cricket pavilion balcony rail....or is it based upon SFARP through risk assessment? (it's not in construction and hence not specified as 950mm) My problem is that it's an old and well used facility with no accidents in the last 30 years and you can't see the cricket from the lowest seating if you increase the rail height. Having said that, the rail is very low (705mm) with an 8 foot drop onto tarmac and is not high enough in my opinion. I would have a battle on my hands to try and increase and hence any advice welcomed.
SteveL  
#2 Posted : 28 March 2011 15:28:24(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
SteveL

Try reg 13 welfare regs
mootoppers  
#3 Posted : 28 March 2011 15:52:40(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
mootoppers

Many thanks Stevel
Bob Shillabeer  
#4 Posted : 28 March 2011 16:01:33(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Bob Shillabeer

Have you thought about some other type of barrier other than one that blocks vision. Try fitting a level of perspex as an additoasnl barrier which would not impair the view. There are several available on the market and won't cost the earth.
Anderson29990  
#5 Posted : 28 March 2011 16:07:03(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
Anderson29990

Working in the Entertainment world i see many low rails and barriers. Either because they are in older premises or because of sightlines issues.

A similar problem has been solved at the new Wembley Stadium where they have created a wider top by the use of brackets to carry catenary wires in parallel to the barrier top. This solution works because by widening the top rail you reduce the likelihood of someone going over - their centre of gravity should remain within the wired area and not just pass the barrier - this is the simpler solution offered in BS6180 the code of practice for handrails and barriers.

Old cinema/theatre balconies are often low but very wide - again to reduce or limit the ability to go straight over. The use of catenary wires means the notional extra width acts as a catcher to someone who stumbles and falls over and into it.

Take the Wembley Stadium tour and have a look - great solution at minimal cost!
Shineon55  
#6 Posted : 28 March 2011 21:27:20(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Shineon55

You could try the Football Licensing Authority Guide to Safety at Sports grounds, which also deals with barrier heights and which is sued by places such as Wembley etc. Building Control may also be able to advise.

Reg 13(1) to 4 of the Workplace Regs was repealed by the Work at Height Regs in 2005 so isn't current.
MEden380  
#7 Posted : 29 March 2011 09:42:40(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
MEden380

Mootoppers
Have you looked at the Building Regs
I think the height of a barrier should be in the region of 1100mm and not allow children to climb over.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.