Rank: Forum user
|
Hi all
I am currently reviewing the current RA policy however it appears I may be tasked with writing all risk assessments! However we presently employ up to 300 employees! With various departments and levels of managers
A brief overview is this:
Competence
Supervisors/managers have attended a recognised 3 day H+S course, and are also experienced in their work areas and processes
And have also been trained in 5 x 5 risk assessment matrix
In addition employees are attending a half day H+S course this is ongoing
Assessments
I would have thought managers/supervisors, in essence those who know their area of responsibility
I am hitting a brick wall; time should be made to complete assessment in each department
From experience who would you think should write assessments? It certainly does not seem feasible to be left on my shoulders besides anything else this is a mammoth task, plus if they where my risk assessments I would want to know that they in fact are adhered too and followed. I would have thought managers/supervisors, in essence those who know their area of responsibility
I am of the opinion that the assessment must be active, and for management not to lose the thought process, their is a clear danger of H+S becoming “somebody else’s responsibility”
In respect of the above what do you think would be the role of the H+S advisor? And subsequent sign off process, I am more than happy to meet with any mangers to assist coach and guide, tool box talks etc but they know their areas best of all
Best wishes
D
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
A suitable and sufficient risk assess is best undertaken by those who know the area that is being assessed ------- I see the managers and people doing the work as the doer's in a joint exercise as this gives ownership and the adviser is the facilitator in the process
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
David
I have just been tasked with updating our risk assessment policy and firmly written into it is the requirment for risk assessments to be completed where possible by a competent team of individuals.
This means individuals trained in risk assessment, engineers, safety professionals, operators with experiance of the issue under assessment etc
I would be very supprised if you were even competent to have the burden of "all the risk assessments" landing on your lap.
It seems to me that there is some training required for the senior managers
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
In essence I agree with the two previous posts. Each area of the business should 'own' their own RAs, which is slightly different from actually writing them. I prefer a conjoined approach with the h&s person facilitating the process. RAs require a certain amount of time and knowledge to produce, so those tasked with the exercise should have the required skills, although they might argue they don't have the time.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
I agree with Ray that the department manager should own and review all risk assessments for their area, but firmly belive you should be involved in assisting with each assessment undertaken if nothing else to guide them through what specific legislation may apply this would also be an opurtunity to coach and gain there thought process, i have seen previously where manager have written a risk assessment to suit the production needs and have clearly missed some significant hazards.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I inherited a system where RA's were the responsibility of the departmental manager. This system was a catastrophy with managers just rubber stamping their old RA's without giving any consideration to change, accidents or anything. The company had a system where different groups of workers would meet management to discuss issues. I managed to tag RA's into these meetings so that each meeting reviewed a number of RA's (if we could get rid or combine we did) and the RA became the property of this steering group (for want of a better term). It took up time and effort but eventually worked well with every member of the steering group having an input and having their name in the "review group" box when the final RA was agreed. My role was predominently administration and distribution of the documentation with advice where necessary. It worked for us and the RA's became useful documents that were considered and used by the workforce.
Take Care
|
|
|
|
Rank: New forum user
|
I found it a common fob off to appoint 1 person to carry out all RA's.
An appointed person to oversee and train on the RA programme is better with the RA's being carried out by yourself and a competent specialist from each section very much in a Behavioural Based Risk Assessment style it tends to cover more options and allows for a competent persons signature on the RA document.
Might be hard to organise and get approval for but the old slight mention of litigation is a trusted tool to use along with the facts about 'suitable and sufficient' one.
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.