Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
spreadtheword  
#1 Posted : 05 April 2011 15:03:12(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
spreadtheword

Hi
Please can someone shed some light on this subject for me, the safety manager at my company has requested every member of staff that are on site take part in A face fit test on particle filter masks my understanding was that these tests are for use with respirators, as the dust masks will not stop tastes and odours coming through. When I asked him about this he flatly said that it must be done.
Gerry Knowles  
#2 Posted : 05 April 2011 15:11:53(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Gerry Knowles

Hi,

The HSE are currently running a campaign in assocation with the BSIF, its called "Clean Air?-Take Care!". I recently went to a HSE sponsored presentation and they gave out the packs.

The message was that all forms of respritory protection are "face fit testable" and apart from those offering the lowest protection they should be. It is worth looking at the web sites and I am sure that your local HSE can provide you with a copy of the pack they handed. You will know thew HSE website, the BSIF website is www.bsif.co.uk.

Hope this helps
Ron Hunter  
#3 Posted : 05 April 2011 23:19:32(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ron Hunter

Yes relevant and valid for all types of RPE, but does he really want or need EVERYONE on Site to be tested?
What kind of site are you on?
Reed21854  
#4 Posted : 06 April 2011 08:27:44(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Reed21854

Hi there

We are currently doing this with all our site staff - we are an electrical company but our staff have to drill into building structures to fix containment and brackets etc. potentially exposing themselves to silica dust. We use disposable FFP3 masks and we are face fitting everyone. I have had this discussion with several HSE inspectors who work in construction and it's what they expect to happen. In addition some of the large contractors are asking for "certificates" of face fit testing. Which I will just make up with our logo on!
MikeSweeney  
#5 Posted : 12 April 2011 15:49:09(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
MikeSweeney

Oh come on guys! FFP3 masks for silica dust? Testing to the standards of mists and virus exclusion for masks that need only exclude dusts? Totally ignoring MSDS WEL for silica dusts? Requirement for testing that is only applicable at time of testing and employing test substances that far exceed parameters of the hazard? You can educate these guys you know. By doing a risk assessment I have demonstrated that such measures are NOT required. I recently also, by dint of research, overturned a PC's requirement that "single use" 1-tonne bags must have handles cut off immediately after delivery to site. In fact even after exposue to UV for 3 months they could hold 3.5 tonnes! So a simple pre-use inspection was an adequate control measure.

Certainly use face-fit tests where the risk requires it but let's use commonsense. We are supposed to be professionals, it's time we educated those who aren't
yulkok  
#6 Posted : 12 April 2011 19:33:08(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
yulkok

Mike, the HSE have been highlighting the dangers of silica dust through their clear the air campaign. They have also issued guidance to their inspector, SIM 02/2009/01 which clearly states the need to undertake facefit tests. I'd suggest that unless they relax this requirement in the light of new evidence then we professionals have no choice but to facefit test disposable FFP3 masks.

zoltangera  
#7 Posted : 13 April 2011 09:47:38(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
zoltangera

YulKok wrote:
Mike, the HSE have been highlighting the dangers of silica dust through their clear the air campaign. They have also issued guidance to their inspector, SIM 02/2009/01 which clearly states the need to undertake facefit tests. I'd suggest that unless they relax this requirement in the light of new evidence then we professionals have no choice but to facefit test disposable FFP3 masks.



SIM 02/2009/01 is for "The control of silica risks associated with kerb, paving and block cutting" not drilling into a wall to fix a bracket.
Taylor  
#8 Posted : 13 April 2011 10:45:01(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Taylor

I've not been directly involved in the issue of face fit testing myself. Is this covered by COSHH Reg 7. If we look at the ACOP to that Regulation, para 150, it covers what is required in terms of fit testing. My reading of that is that fit testing is required for tight fitting' face pieces. This will include the particle filter masks mentioned in the original question. It doesn't have to be a 'quantitative test'. A qualitative test will be sufficient.

MikeSweeney - just to check my understanding of what you are saying, are you arguing that such tests are not required in these circumstances? If so, how does this line up with the ACOP referenced above?
Bob Howden  
#9 Posted : 13 April 2011 11:07:34(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Bob Howden


Just to add my take on this -

Where RPE forms part of the control measures to protect the employee as recorded in the COSHH assessment then face-fit testing is required to ensure that the control measure is effective.

If the employees are not wearing the RPE correctly then it's effectiveness as a control measure must surely be in doubt.
jde  
#10 Posted : 13 April 2011 12:58:57(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
jde

Having attended an HSE presentation on OH, I took the opportunity to enquire about face fit testing. The answer was very categorical, all forms of RPE should be face fit tested to the person this included FFP2 / 3 filtered dust masks. Irrespective of any Risk Assessment this is the policy that HSE are looking to enforce. The face fit process was very illuminating as the FFP3 masks were suitable for the majority, there were some whom it was not suitable for and the i/2 mask filtered was the mask they needed
bod212  
#11 Posted : 13 April 2011 15:15:03(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
bod212

I draw all your attention to HSG53 RPE at Work, specfifically where wear times are indicated for non-powered half and full face masks (<1 hour), pages 36 to 39. Aside from the need to carry out face fit testing, what are others doing in respect of control measures to comply with this 'guidance'? Tens of thousands of workers in many industries up and down the land are wearing masks for more than an hour at a time, surely?
kdrew  
#12 Posted : 13 April 2011 16:37:00(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
kdrew

In addition to the advice in HSG53 mentioned above therre is wealth of information in Information Document HSE 282/28, Fit testing of respiratory protective equipment facepieces.
Gary Briggs  
#13 Posted : 14 April 2011 18:50:33(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Gary Briggs

Have a look on the 3M web page all training for fit-to-fit free of charge providing you purchase their products, cost wise it is more beneficial to purchase theirs and the FP3 masks are reusable

Regards

Gary
Invictus  
#14 Posted : 15 April 2011 08:02:26(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Invictus

Isn't this a new requirement under the COSHH regulations for 'Face fit testing' for RPE.
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.