Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Grant1962  
#1 Posted : 11 May 2011 13:22:14(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Grant1962

I have copied a statement from Workplace law regarding the reporting methods for future RIODDOR incidents, please see below. Under new reporting arrangements, businesses will still be able to notify fatal and major incidents and injuries by phone, the HSE has confirmed today. From 12 September 2011, all other reportable work-related injuries and incidents under RIDDOR (the Reporting of Injuries, Diseases and Dangerous Occurrences Regulations 1995) will move to a predominantly online system, through a suite of seven forms available on HSE's website. Employers will no longer be able to report incidents by email, post or fax. Trevor Carlile, HSE's Director of Strategy, said: "More than half of reportable injuries are already notified to the HSE through the website and this proportion has been increasing steadily over the past seven years. Taking advantage of the growing use of the internet allows the HSE to be more efficient in the way it works. We do recognise, however, that people reporting a traumatic event still need that personal interaction so the notification of fatal and major incidents and injuries will still take place by phone." The HSE confirmed that business will be able to notify fatal and major incidents and injuries online if they choose to do so. HSE's Infoline telephone service, which currently provides a basic information service to callers, will end on 30 September 2011. Businesses and members of the public seeking information and official guidance on health and safety will instead need to use the HSE's website. Regards Grant
Graham Bullough  
#2 Posted : 11 May 2011 17:58:45(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Graham Bullough

Grant - Thanks for sharing the information. Do any other users of this forum share my dismay at the cessation of fax as a method of reporting under RIDDOR? Using fax may not be modern or trendy but it has some advantages. These include the fact that sending a fax can be used for notifications which need to be made "forthwith" and simultaneously providing the requisite basic details on a F2508. It is also a lot quicker than phoning or notifiying online. In addition, it helps to keep the amount of paper involved to a minimum. Some people may say that fax machines have difficulty coping with documents which include shading: However, it's not difficult to obtain non-shaded versions of F2508 or for HSE to devise a version with shading in the form of dots which don't cause problems. Though fax (facsimile) machines have been around for many years, they are still used to a notable extent by some people, including lawyers and estate agents. Before typing this reply, I had a quick word with two members of my employer's legal dept. They confirmed that their dept still makes considerable use of faxes because of their particular advantages. If others think there is a case for retaining fax for making RIDDOR notifications, would they be willing jointly or individually to ask HSE to change its intention to cease accepting fax notifications? To avoid any misunderstanding, I am not a 'dinosaur' with a particular penchant for using fax. As with various other communication methods, it has its pros and cons. Also, the references to on-line reporting seem to reflect a creeping assumption by some organisations and persons within the UK that everybody everywhere has constant access to a computer. Also, it may surprise some people that my colleagues and I within a sizeable local authority don't make RIDDOR notifications ourselves. However, as managers are responsible for making notifications, we are ready to advise them if required about the mysteries and intricacies of RIDDOR. p.s. Time will tell if this topic will reap many replies or just a few and then rapidly gets relegated from page 1 of this forum!
NigelB  
#3 Posted : 11 May 2011 22:33:52(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
NigelB

Grant Thanks for the information - it is useful. Graham I understand that because the HSE receive 50% of their reports through the Internet already - and more people are using it to report injuries - I presume they are helping 'business' by cutting down the number of methods that can be used. Shame about those with no access to computers. Just having one reporting method makes life so much simpler. It seems to me that if a fax machine can do the job it should be used. However ...... Using the online service is beneficial for HSE 'to be more efficient in the way it works' - by saving money and cutting staff perhaps. Presumably convenience to their 'customers' is not particularly relevant. This 'more efficient .... way it works' will be helped considerably by the cut of 27,000 reports a year predicted in the HSE Consultation Document on RIDDOR. This proposes injuries over 7 days being reported instead of the current over 3 day requirement. Apparently this move will help business save an estimated £7.91 per report they will not be required to fill in for injuries between 3 and 6 days absence from normal work. Quoting from the HSE Press Release on this issue www.hse.gov.uk/press/2011/hse-icc.htm the HSE state: 'with a suite of seven forms available on HSE's website to make the statutory reporting process quick and easy.' So cut down the reporting methods to one and move from one form to seven. I look forward to hearing the squeals of delight from the CBI, Federation of Small Businesses, EEF et al at this lifting of the 'health and safety burden' so that business growth can leap ahead, unfettered by needless red tape. Cheers. Nigel
bob youel  
#4 Posted : 12 May 2011 07:40:11(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
bob youel

In my personal opinion and irrespective of all else ensure that U have your back covered so report in as many ways as U think fit and ensure that U have adeqauate records to prove that U have reported As for the banning of faxes etc --- well enough said as those at the top are interested in one thing only
Fletcher  
#5 Posted : 12 May 2011 12:27:28(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Fletcher

Personally have always reported by e-mail because it was for me easier. Wonder if when you have reported a RIDDOR you will still get acopy of your report posted back? That always seemed a waste to me. Take Care
Graham Bullough  
#6 Posted : 14 May 2011 22:50:23(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Graham Bullough

Some forum readers may be interested to learn that the first prototype fax machine incorporating clocks, electric currents and electrochemically sensitive paper was made as early as the 1840s by Alexander Bain (1811-1877), an inventive crofter's son from Caithness. Bain also invented the first electric clock. Adam Hart Davis demonstrated a working pair of Bain's fax machine made for one of his TV programmes about inventors a few years ago. Unfortunately, technical shortcomings prevented Bain's machine from becoming commercially viable. The first effective version is reported to have been devised by Giovanni Caselli an Italian inventor in the 1860s and used between Paris and Lyon. Enough of the historical snippet. To echo my earlier question, what do others think about the intended abolition of fax as a means of making RIDDOR notifications? If HSE think fax is an outdated obsolete method, their reported intention to send paper copies, perhaps multi-page ones, by post (alias snail mail) as subsequent confirmation to notifiers also seems a bit bizarre.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.