Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
firesafety101  
#1 Posted : 26 May 2011 16:12:44(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

I'm having one of those days - you know when you think you know the answer but doubt creeps in? As far as I am concerned fire resisting glazing must be identified by an acid etched trade name and BS476 part 22. If either is missing the glazing is not fire resisting and must be replaced. I came across a brand new FR door today with etched marking "WOODS BS 6206 A TOUGH" in one corner and as far as I am concerned this is not to be accepted. Am I right?
Safety Smurf  
#2 Posted : 26 May 2011 16:21:18(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Safety Smurf

Can't imagine that there is any legal requirement to ensure that fire resistance is to 'British Standards'?
Ron Hunter  
#3 Posted : 26 May 2011 16:24:48(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ron Hunter

I seem to recall Building Regulations require kitemark and BS visible at one corner of plain glass. Does Georgian Wired Polished Plate not also qualify as acceptable though?
SW  
#4 Posted : 26 May 2011 16:42:15(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
SW

Several types of glass are Fire Resisting and will be stamped. Straight forward Tough safety glass Class 1 or 6206 A is not classed as a Fire Resisting. You can get modified Tough that is Fire Resisting though - think this is called Pyran. Georgian Wired (Clear and Obscure) is Fire Resisting - time depending on the frame. This is not an insulating glass but integrity only. Pyrodur and Pyrostop are clear laminated (Intumescent layers) Fire Resisting Glass and will also be stamped as such - generally will have 14449 on it and another ref such as EW30. These can give integrity and insulation protection.
MaxPayne  
#5 Posted : 27 May 2011 07:24:59(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
MaxPayne

SW is quite right; I'd suggest you check the Pilkington site for more information on fire resisting glass. http://www.pilkington.co...reprotection/default.htm BS 6206 defines the term breaks safely by reference to the outcome of the impact test. • Toughened glass breaks safely if the glass breaks into sufficiently small fragments after impact, I.e. if the weight of the 10 largest crack-free particles weigh less than the equivalent of 6500mm2 of the original sample. • Laminated glass, wired glass and filmed glass are deemed to have broken safely if, after the impact, any glass fragments which fall off are not too large (defined in BS 6206) and it is not possible to pass a 75mm diameter sphere through any opening formed in the glass. Other glass products used for glazing, e.g. annealed (ordinary) glass, or heat strengthened glass, do not break safely, and can only pass the requirements if they do not break in the test. The test requires either a standard size or the maximum size of pane available if this is smaller than the standard size. The test specimen size is 865x1930mm. A safety glass only complies with BS6206 if it is marked as doing so. The standard requires that all installed panels shall be marked to include the following: • An identifiable name or trademark or other mark capable of identification through a suitable source • The type of material • The number of the British Standard, i.e. BS 6206 • The classification relating to impact test behaviour (Class A, B or C). These marks shall be permanent and applied before installation in a position to remain visible after installation. All suppliers of final cut sizes of safety glass should mark the glass in accordance with BS 6206. BS 6206 has now been superseded and replaced by EN 12600. Marking of safety glass has now changed. Please see BS 6262 Part 4 for requirements or contact the Technical Advisory Service on (01744) 69 2000 for guidance.
firesafety101  
#6 Posted : 27 May 2011 10:26:58(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

Thanks Max, lots of good info there - however you haven't answered my question about fire rated glass? I now have the answer, from calling one of the largest glass manufacturers in the country, just happens to be the same company your phone number belongs to, as follows: BSEN14449 is the marking on laminated safety glass, also the name of manufacturer and - 30E or E30 for fire rated glass. For wired glass BSEN 572 with the name of manufacturer and 30E or E30. If 60 min FR then it will be E60 or 60E. If it does not have 30E or E30 it is not fire rated.
MaxPayne  
#7 Posted : 27 May 2011 11:51:47(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
MaxPayne

ChrisBurns wrote:
Thanks Max, lots of good info there - however you haven't answered my question about fire rated glass? Chris, sorry I'm not an expert on glass, just pointing out that BS 6206 only refers to the impact testing and safe breakage of glass, i.e. laminated, anealed etc. (not an expert). Pilkington would know what you're after and I believe thaey have product experts which would be able to advise you of the installation query you have.
firesafety101  
#8 Posted : 27 May 2011 13:29:03(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

Max, apologies if I was a bit abrupt, I thank you for your efforts and I did contact Pilks for the info before I read your post. Great minds think alike! I put the info in the post for others who may be interested. I think the proverbial has hit the fan now - I did a fire risk assessment yesterday and the contractor that installed the fr door has really botched it up. The fire risk assessment has been initiated by Building Control who required to see the fra before they would issue the final certificate. If it wasn't for them the fra may never have been done.
MaxPayne  
#9 Posted : 27 May 2011 13:36:13(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
MaxPayne

ChrisBurns wrote:
Max, apologies if I was a bit abrupt, I thank you for your efforts and I did contact Pilks for the info before I read your post. Great minds think alike! I put the info in the post for others who may be interested. I think the proverbial has hit the fan now - I did a fire risk assessment yesterday and the contractor that installed the fr door has really botched it up. The fire risk assessment has been initiated by Building Control who required to see the fra before they would issue the final certificate. If it wasn't for them the fra may never have been done.
Chris, we could start a whole new thread about fire doors being installed incorrectly; we have some "not so expert" installers here who have created a huge problem by them and their supervisors not sticking to the specification. Fortunatley not my area of responsibilty, but a minefield nonetheless. It's Friday afternoon and a bank holiday weekend ..... Yipee :-) Have a good one all.
Billibob  
#10 Posted : 27 May 2011 16:22:48(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Billibob

MaxPayne wrote:
Chris, we could start a whole new thread about fire doors being installed incorrectly; we have some "not so expert" installers here who have created a huge problem by them and their supervisors not sticking to the specification. Fortunatley not my area of responsibilty, but a minefield nonetheless. It's Friday afternoon and a bank holiday weekend ..... Yipee :-) Have a good one all.
I agree since I "inherited" fire safety there are a number of problems with fire doors which we have come across. Have started to try and tackle this but an uphill battle although now will not sign off new projects if the doors are not installed correctly! Still leaves a few thousand doors to inspect!!
messyshaw  
#11 Posted : 27 May 2011 21:51:04(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
messyshaw

ChrisBurns wrote:
The fire risk assessment has been initiated by Building Control who required to see the fra before they would issue the final certificate. If it wasn't for them the fra may never have been done.
That's a little underhand isn't it? The FRA & completion certificate are completely separate items and for BC to demand to see a RP's FRA seems dodgy. My initial thoughts are that BC haven't a right to see/demand it. Is this happening elsewhere?
firesafety101  
#12 Posted : 28 May 2011 11:33:54(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

messey I don't know but perhaps they visited the site and were not happy with the fire arrangements, I wonder if they looked at the fire door and saw what I saw i.e. the glazing was not right? I believe they were correct in at least suggesting a fire risk assessment even if they are not the enforcer. At least it has had some affect.
MaxPayne  
#13 Posted : 31 May 2011 11:54:30(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
MaxPayne

The GGF have some decent publications also. http://www.ggf.org.uk/publications
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.