IOSH forums home
»
Our public forums
»
OSH discussion forum
»
Another quickie...removal of fire fighting equipment in residential bedsits
Rank: Super forum user
|
I have been informed today that the area LFB officer has recommended the removal of fire extinguishers from a block of residential (7) bedsits with communal areas. I seem to recall a discussion on this subject in the past, so forgive me if I am digging up old ground. However, whilst I appreciate that members of the public are not trained in fire fighting techniques is does seem a bit drastic to remove all the fire extinguishers. I thought the FRA was supposed to identify the risks, has anyone completed a FRA recommending the removal of fire extinguishers?
Cheers - Ray
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Thanks for the responses guys. However, I would still interested if any practitioner has identified through the FRA process that fire extinguishers should be removed?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
RayRapp,
What was the reasoning for the removal of the Fire Extinguishers?
Phil.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Ray, In the office I work at last year we took the decision not to remove the extinguishers but did not train anyone in thier use as we decided the best form of protection was to get the emergency evacuation plan widely know and acted upon whilst leaving the actual fire fighting to the professionals. The office had no serious fire hazards anyway and it was on the fact that fire was very unlikely and escape was the better option. I guess we could have removed the wextinguishers but decided to cover any lingering legal need for them
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Phil
It appears that the LFB would rather residents escape from a fire than use the fire fighting equipment, particularly if residents have not been trained in fire fighting techniques. I can see some logic to this argument but, surely if it is a small fire (archetypal waste paper bin), it would be better to distinguish the fire than have a serious situation unfold where people may get killed. I can see the headlines - fire in hotel could not be extinguished because the fire extinguishers had been removed!
There is no legal requirement to remove fire extinguishers. The person completing the FRA is to determine whether fire extinguishers are to be removed or not. I know if it was my building I would be unhappy with the removal of fire fighting equipment. Nothing seems simple any more, or am I having a bad day?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Aay, no just an average day of muli choices I think. There are better ways to put a waste bin fire out, simply tip water on it, less mess. But, as I said we chose to keep the fire extinguishers although no one had been trained in how to use one properly. There are many thought about how to use a fire extinguisher mostly incorrect methods. I was trained quite some years ago and it was very interesting how diferently fire can behave and that is the most important lesson about using one. For example when using a foam extinguisher or a gas one all you do is break the fire triangle by reducing the oxygen content which can of course soon be replaced and the fire re ignight and bite you on the bum so you always back away and never turn and walk away. Quite a few people have been badly burned doing it that way. Therefore to use a fire extinguisher correctly needs training, and refresher training at relavent periodisity, or do away with them and let the professionals deal with the fire.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Bob
As I said, I can see the logic, but what is wrong with keeping the status quo and advising residents to evacuate when the fire alarm sounds? You cannot force someone to use a fire extinguisher, it's possible a person has the basic knowledge to use a fire extinguisher safely - after all, it's not a gun!
I'm not comfortable with the removal of them altogether. The residents I referred to are provided information on fire and emergency situations on induction. Plus there is appropriate signage in communal areas.
|
|
|
|
Rank: New forum user
|
Extinguishers are as you know "portable fire fighting equipment" although some of the residents may not be trained in how to use them they are ultimatley positioned to aid the escape from a building especially near stairways and exits.
It's better to give people a chance to escape if the fire has spread to different parts of the building.
Remove the extinguishers and you are removing the chance of people being able to get through an exit by either extinguishing the fire or reducing it so that you are able to get out.
These are my thoughts anyway
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
One reason I was offered some years ago for the removal of fire extinguishers from the communal areas of a residential premise was to reduce the risk of an occupant using extinguishers wrongly - a reason I agree with.
The original post by the way was enquiring about an issue in a 'residential' property and not an office building.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Slightly tangetial perhaps, but does anyone include in their fire risk assessments the impact or potential impact of the number of occasions that the LFB are on strike or are threatening to stike?
It seems to crop up with depressing regularity, and it must make a difference beyond simply increasing the number of taxis on the road!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
RayRapp wrote:I have been informed today that the area LFB officer has recommended the removal of fire extinguishers from a block of residential (7) bedsits with communal areas. I seem to recall a discussion on this subject in the past, so forgive me if I am digging up old ground. However, whilst I appreciate that members of the public are not trained in fire fighting techniques is does seem a bit drastic to remove all the fire extinguishers. I thought the FRA was supposed to identify the risks, has anyone completed a FRA recommending the removal of fire extinguishers?
Cheers - Ray
I am a little concerned that the LFB have recommended anything, as their role is to audit fire safety management (including the suitability of the FRA) against the RR(FS)O 2005 and enforce provisions of the Order if necessary.
I would be interested if this was official/written advice from a fire safety dept or casual advice from an operational crew.
If the RP wants to remove FFE, then he must justify it, and the LFB should determine whether it is a suitable action for the specific circumstances. It is not their (LFB's) role to recommend or act unilaterally away from the Govt guides.
This is dangerous territory as it's the RP's responsibility and not the enforcing authority to make provision to satisfy the Order. What would happen in the event of a serious injury or death in a premises where FFE would have helped, but the LFB recommended it's withdrawal??
The LFB would back track this FFE 'recommendation' quicker than an MP switching car seats with his wife when caught speeding :)
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Bedsits with communal areas. It depends on the individual circumstances and cannot be a blanket policy.
It may be that FE's are not required as they would never be used however it could also be that FE's would be required to assist in fire fighting to aid means of escape.
I would not accept what the fire brigade officer has said without looking at each situation separately.
As an example I did a fra on a betting shop last week, there were no FE's anywhere near the front door/exit. My decision was not to recommend any at that point due to the potential for vandalism, and if in a fire situation persons can reach the front door they can just continue out and evacuate.
FE's are available in staff occupied areas of the premises.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Chris, what odds did they give you for a fire breaking out?
Seriously, this so-called advice from the LFB appears to be in keeping with the article referenced in an earlier post - http://www.timesonline.c...ws/uk/article3525380.ece
Not wishing to 'open a can of worms' but the Lacors document also referenced earlier suggests that fire extinguishers may be removed, however if they are retained they should be of a dry powder type. Great, the landlord of the premises I will be inspecting has Water/CO2!
I think that Ian has also made a valid point about fire fighters going on strike. Not that I will mention it directly to a LFB officer. Surely, regardless of what advice is considered best practice, it is up to the person completing the FRA to determine whether FFE is to be retained insitu or not? That for me is the crux of the issue against some blanket rule.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Chris, what odds did they give you for a fire breaking out?
Ray, the area occupied by the public are low fire risk. The more high risk areas i.e. electrical equipment, kitchen etc. are staffed at all times and there are FE's in place.
I don't think members of the general public should be expected to fight fires.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Chris, this is about members of the public - who are at work - and would you expect them to fight a fire just because they are at work? I have carried out FRAs on small (2/3 floors) blocks of flats and have recommended FE removal, and had that ratified by the local fire enforcement bods in a number of counties. We all know the dangers as they crop up in every training course - staying to fight when you should be leaving, not all smoke is visible, it's the smoke that gets you rather than the flames, you can get freezer burns from co2 FEs, etc etc. This being domestic premises, no-one will presumably have had recent training - or any - on correct use of FEs, and may have inhaled something or have had alcohol, either of which can obviously cloud judgement. This is sleeping accommodation but is not for most purposes a workplace with certain caveats, but the postie is only there for a few minutes.
The extinguishers get vandalised and abused and removed, so when you need them they are either empty or missing. When they are taken off the wall, residents come back from the pub and fall over them as they are left in the wrong place.
Get rid. In my opinion anyway.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Thanks for all the responses. I'm not sure this one has been completely put to bed and possibly, God forbid, only a major disaster will it re-surface sometime in the future. Some mixed responses but suffice to say I will go along with the LFBs recommendation.
About ten years ago London Underground applied to the HMRI through their Safety Case to have removed all fire extinguishers on underground trains. This application was accepted on the basis that there is little on a train which will catch fire and extinguishers were being abused by passengers. I never had a problem with this initiative as it made good sense to me. I don't feel so comfortable with no FFE in residential homes.
Good night and don't have nightmares.
|
|
|
|
IOSH forums home
»
Our public forums
»
OSH discussion forum
»
Another quickie...removal of fire fighting equipment in residential bedsits
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.