Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Zanshin67  
#1 Posted : 24 June 2011 13:47:00(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Zanshin67

Hi All A colleague of mine has posed a question asking if our trained first aiders would be allowed to give a small dose of aspirin to a visitor, or employee if they had a heart attack, he feels that if we did not act we could leave ourselves wide open. what are your thoughts? Cheers Dave
colinreeves  
#2 Posted : 24 June 2011 13:55:22(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
colinreeves

Dave There was a long thread on Epi-pens a while ago, but aspirin was also mentioned. Not a clear answer, but have a read yourself. http://forum.iosh.co.uk/...aspx?g=posts&t=96384
MB1  
#3 Posted : 24 June 2011 14:09:06(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
MB1

MB1  
#4 Posted : 24 June 2011 14:12:27(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
MB1

oops sorry... Dave!
achrn  
#5 Posted : 24 June 2011 14:42:47(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
achrn

The last first aid refresher I did (Red Cross, February this year) administering aspirin is now allowed in cases of suspected heart attack (300mg, chew it, if they are adult and can confirm they can take aspirin). So your first aiders are now allowed to give aspirin (but you're still not supposed to have it in first aid boxes - store it elsewhere).
bob youel  
#6 Posted : 24 June 2011 14:45:14(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
bob youel

Dispensing is not part of F-Aid law; its as simple as that I doubt that any judge in the country would allow a prosecution where somebody was trying their best within the framework of the law
CRN Baker  
#7 Posted : 24 June 2011 15:08:37(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
CRN Baker

I have had the same experience as achrn, I sat the full emergency first aid course in February this year and our trainers have briefed us in exactly the same way as the Red Cross. There is guidance on the HSE website: http://www.hse.gov.uk/firstaid/faqs.htm, it's right at the very bottom under Tablets and medication... "First aid at work does not include giving tablets or medicines to treat illness. The only exception to this is where aspirin is used when giving first aid to a casualty with a suspected heart attack in accordance with currently accepted first-aid practice. It is recommended that tablets and medicines should not be kept in the first-aid box." HTH CRN
achrn  
#8 Posted : 24 June 2011 15:10:32(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
achrn

bob youel wrote:
Dispensing is not part of F-Aid law; its as simple as that
No, it is not as simple as that. http://www.hse.gov.uk/firstaid/faqs.htm#tablets First aiders are not to give medicine EXCEPT for the case of aspirin. There is a specific exception for administering aspirin in the case of heart attack. The casualty does NOT need to provide their own aspirin. On the epipen topic, first aiders can administer an epipen to a casualty who has been prescribed that epipen by a doctor. The casualty DOES need to provide the epipen.
MB1  
#9 Posted : 24 June 2011 15:18:36(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
MB1

But if the casualty dosn't carry it (likely if prescibed it) who dos?
chas  
#10 Posted : 24 June 2011 15:28:44(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
chas

I have to say that I am no medic, however whilst HSE say it may be permissable to give aspirin in some circumstances you still need to be sure the person involved is not on other drugs that may thin the blood (eg Warfarin, Heparin or Fragmin) otherwise I suspect you may help hasten their departure rather than save them!
bob youel  
#11 Posted : 24 June 2011 16:21:47(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
bob youel

achrn: I appreciate your posting and comments and know where you are coming from however I confirm the provision of medicine is disallowed in FA law but as in all things people should consult all areas before they allow their people to administer etc anything & common sense should apply irrespective of all other areas
achrn  
#12 Posted : 24 June 2011 18:53:14(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
achrn

bob youel wrote:
achrn: I appreciate your posting and comments and know where you are coming from however I confirm the provision of medicine is disallowed in FA law
I do hope you will write to the HSE and put them right then, because they've been spreading misinformation all over the place: http://www.hse.gov.uk/firstaid/faqs.htm#tablets they say aspirin is the exception to the rules about distributing medicine. http://www.hse.gov.uk/fi...rs/fawnewsletter0211.pdf they say they are worried that firstaiders are getting mixed messages and might not give aspirin. http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/books/l74.htm the first aid at work ACOP paragraph 42 again says aspirin is teh exception to teh general rule about medicines http://www.aifawto.co.uk...pirin-administration.asp letters to first-aid training organisations - "The teaching of assisting a casualty to take an aspirin (300mg) whom you believe might be suffering a heart attack should be encouraged" You'll also need to set the Red Cross (at least) straight, because (as previously noted) they are contradicting you in training for FAW. Can you provide a reference to the FA law that disallows provision of any and all medicine including aspirin?
Canopener  
#13 Posted : 24 June 2011 21:20:36(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Canopener

The original post was about administering (not dispensing) aspirin, and the current HSE advice is pretty clear about that one. As it is on epipens. I don't know if there are any contraindications for giving aspirin with warfarin etc or if a single dose would likely to have any significant adverse reaction, as opposed to not giving it. However, as someone that takes (prescription) aspirin daily I can say that 'technically' aspirin doesn't thin the blood, but makes it less 'sticky' reducing the clotting action of the platelets.
johnmurray  
#14 Posted : 25 June 2011 14:05:07(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
johnmurray

So first-aiders are now diagnosticians ? Pray tell me the difference between pain from a stomach ulcer and a heart problem ? Not only that, but aspirin given to men reduces the likelihood of heart attacks caused by clots [blood] but increases the incidence of stokes....in women the reverse is the case. Hopefully your first-aiders are told not to administer any medication to an unconscious or confused person....otherwise your well-meant administering of aspirin, to me, would lead to major stomach hemorrhage.
CRN Baker  
#15 Posted : 27 June 2011 10:12:28(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
CRN Baker

Further to my earlier post, the first aiders where I work have to complete an "aspirin" checklist to identify the following: Known aspirin allergy? Haemophiliac? Anti coagulants? Recent Aspirin consumption? Ulcers? Asthma? Fortunately aspirin has never been given, however every effort is made to ensure that anyone who has allergy or other issues is not given a substance which would make their condition worse. This checklist is part of a wider treatment record which we developed on the advice of our First Aid Trainers.
MB1  
#16 Posted : 27 June 2011 10:57:37(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
MB1

Interesting concept CRN But how do you provide individual confidentiality with this checklist method, where is the information stored, who has access to it etc? Unless your RA has detailed risks to injured/ill employees due to location, accessibility, communication etc Some areas of potential treatment being offered may be borderline with regards to offering first aid (as the name suggests) until specialised assistance turns up on site. It is documented that offering a 300mg dose to a conscious person presenting chest pains is unlikely to cause complications, although in most clinical settings there is alternative therapy immediately available should adverse reactions/contra indications exist. Caution and common sense prevails in just how far you should go as each individual incident should be approached on it's own merit!
CRN Baker  
#17 Posted : 27 June 2011 11:26:59(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
CRN Baker

MB1 totally agree with you re each case on its own merit. With regard confidentiality, the top copy of the treatment form has the patients details. This is handed over to the emergency services on their arrival. The carbon copy has the patients details are blanked out and a note of the ref # is made on the details of the first aid report, thus confidentiality is kept. We are quite a way from the nearest A&E and following a risk assessment we have installed two defibrillators and chosen this route as everything is documented and can be referred back to. I am not saying it's foolproof, but believe with the training and support given by the trainers, the company has done its best to cover most eventualities and provide the best care to any potential suspected heart attack victim. I sincerely hope we never have to put it into practice.
MrsBlue  
#18 Posted : 27 June 2011 13:49:56(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Guest

Warfarin does not thin the blood. It only stops clotting. Rich
achrn  
#19 Posted : 27 June 2011 15:17:45(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
achrn

johnmurray wrote:
So first-aiders are now diagnosticians ?
Always have been. Treatment for shock is very different from treatment for heart attack (for example) - your first aider is trained to diagnose and take appropriate action. I'm slightly surprised this comes as news to anyone.
johnmurray  
#20 Posted : 27 June 2011 17:37:09(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
johnmurray

First aiders are not medically qualified [most] Diagnosing complaints is not in their emit and could be dangerous, hence the "do no harm" Fully trained primary healthcare professionals still make mistakes, and misdiagnosis of heart problems is rife, as is misdiagnosis of everything else (30% error rate in diagnoses by doctors) Even giving someone a "plaster" risks anaphylactic shock....how bland is a plaster ? Mind you, I suppose if you had an epipen around they could partially solve the problem they created. Aspirin should also NOT be offered to people who are intolerant to ibuprofen or naproxen. Or anyone under 18, or who is asthmatic. Not to mention diabetics treated by drugs along.. Etc Etc Etc....... Just hope the diagnosis of "heart attack" is right.
CARL25764  
#21 Posted : 27 June 2011 20:05:50(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
CARL25764

Surely as first aiders you were taught to give a single dose of 300mg of asprin to a patient having a heart attack. I am a first aid instructor in St John ambulance and it is clearly written so in the first aid manuals that you can give asprin. And advise the casualty to chew it slowly.
achrn  
#22 Posted : 28 June 2011 08:16:21(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
achrn

JohnMurray wrote:
First aiders are not medically qualified [most] Diagnosing complaints is not in their emit and could be dangerous,
Nonsense. Diagnosing complaints is precisely what they are trained to do. A first aider is trained to diagnose and take appropriate action within the limits of their training. You seem to want first-aiders to make no decision and do everything the same (or possiblty do nothing at all - not even apply a sticking plaster). It's just not that simple - first aiders have to assess what the problem is and act appropriately. CPR for a drowning is different from CPR for something else. Treatment for heat stroke is different from treatment for epilepsy, or hypoglycemia, or shock, or heart attack. That training DOES include administering aspirin in case of suspected heart attack. Current first aid advice is that for a suspected heart attack, with an adult casualty who can take aspirin, you should give a 300mg aspirin and advise them to chew it.
JohnMurray wrote:
Aspirin should also NOT be offered to people who are intolerant to ibuprofen or naproxen. Or anyone under 18, or who is asthmatic.
Really, what part of "with an adult casualty who can take aspirin" (or, as I said previously "if they are adult and can confirm they can take aspirin") is it that you don't understand? Aspirin SHOULD be offered to an asult suspected heart attack casualty who says they can take aspirin. YOU are contradicting current first aid advice. YOU are contradicting current first aid training. I hope you've thought through the implications of instructing first-aiders to go against their training.
JohnMurray wrote:
Just hope the diagnosis of "heart attack" is right.
Personally, I always hope that any of my first aiders, or any foirst aider who treats me, or me if I'm treating someone, gets the diagnosis right.
johnmurray  
#23 Posted : 28 June 2011 09:15:42(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
johnmurray

Then you are a fool. Even very well qualified doctors make incorrect diagnoses. I expect a first, or foirst, aider to do as little as possible and get any casualty QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL HELP as soon as possible. Personally, I consider most to be elevated to a position higher (in their own opinion) than that of a consultant. A first-aider is an ordinary person with basic "first-aid" training. the emphasis is on BASIC. Plasters but not pills.
Canopener  
#24 Posted : 28 June 2011 16:20:46(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Canopener

Ding, ding! Could I suggest a breather? I must admit that I sat there last night, composed a response and then decided against it; but here goes. I suggest that first aiders do of course have to carry out some sort of diagnosis, for example under what circumstances would you be able to give CPR if you hadn’t carried out some form of assessment (diagnosis) indicating that it was necessary in the first place? Both the HSE and NHS sites ‘recommend’ the giving of aspirin for suspected (conscious) heart attack victims. There is always a risk that there is a contraindication, but this has to be weighed up against not giving it at all. It would seem reasonable to conclude that both the HSE and NHS have considered the various issues and have concluded that on balance the risk is acceptable, the risk of not giving outweighs the risk of giving. I am aware that there are allergic reactions to plasters, although I must admit I had never considered this to be as serious as anaphylaxis and couldn’t find any evidence of this after a brief Google. I suffer from diabetes treated with oral medication only but my doctor also prescribes aspirin which I take daily. I’m still here 8 years later!
Whitehouse28112  
#25 Posted : 06 July 2011 14:47:53(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Whitehouse28112

Give an asprin if the person says it's ok to..it could save their life. I don't recall anyone dying from an asprin.
johnmurray  
#26 Posted : 06 July 2011 20:10:57(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
johnmurray

"Aspirin inhibits the enzyme cyclooxygenase resulting in a decrease in the output of the platelet aggregating factor thromboxane A2. This beneficial effect appears to be completely offset by aspirin's inhibition of prostacyclin which is a very effective inhibitor of platelet aggregating" Proper trials do not confirm the beneficial effect of aspirin. Oh, and CHEWING the tablet is recommended.....after making sure that it is not enteric coated... "By all three measurements, chewed aspirin worked fastest. It needed only five minutes to reduce TxB2 concentrations by 50%; the Alka-Seltzer took almost 8 minutes, and the swallowed tablet took 12 minutes. Similarly, it took 14 minutes for the chewed tablet to produce maximal platelet inhibition; it took Alka-Seltzer 16 minutes and the swallowed tablet 26 minutes"
Jane Blunt  
#27 Posted : 07 July 2011 07:27:57(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Jane Blunt

JohnMurray wrote:
"Aspirin inhibits the enzyme cyclooxygenase resulting in a decrease in the output of the platelet aggregating factor thromboxane A2. This beneficial effect appears to be completely offset by aspirin's inhibition of prostacyclin which is a very effective inhibitor of platelet aggregating"
To avoid an accusation of brech of copyright, this text appears to come from this page: http://www.newswithviews...m/Howenstine/james10.htm The article is discussing the effects of using aspirin as a long term preventative medication, rather than an emergency treatment.
JohnMurray wrote:
"By all three measurements, chewed aspirin worked fastest. It needed only five minutes to reduce TxB2 concentrations by 50%; the Alka-Seltzer took almost 8 minutes, and the swallowed tablet took 12 minutes. Similarly, it took 14 minutes for the chewed tablet to produce maximal platelet inhibition; it took Alka-Seltzer 16 minutes and the swallowed tablet 26 minutes"
This text appears to have come from http://www.health.harvar...pdates/update0505a.shtml
teh_boy  
#28 Posted : 07 July 2011 08:59:38(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
teh_boy

JohnMurray wrote:
"Aspirin inhibits the enzyme cyclooxygenase resulting in a decrease in the output of the platelet aggregating factor thromboxane A2. This beneficial effect appears to be completely offset by aspirin's inhibition of prostacyclin which is a very effective inhibitor of platelet aggregating" Proper trials do not confirm the beneficial effect of aspirin. Oh, and CHEWING the tablet is recommended.....after making sure that it is not enteric coated... "By all three measurements, chewed aspirin worked fastest. It needed only five minutes to reduce TxB2 concentrations by 50%; the Alka-Seltzer took almost 8 minutes, and the swallowed tablet took 12 minutes. Similarly, it took 14 minutes for the chewed tablet to produce maximal platelet inhibition; it took Alka-Seltzer 16 minutes and the swallowed tablet 26 minutes"
I despair... This question has been answered correctly by almost everyone but still we argue.... Current guidelines suggest giving aspirin swings the balance of probability in the casualties favour. Complications from one 300mg aspirin are possible but very rare. Complications from a heart attack = come on John cut and paste some good long carido words for us :) I'll use death. As John mentioned stroke, I asked my wife, (Stroke Nurse) who just chuckled and rolled her eyes, aspirin long term yes, one 300mg tablet - no. Also I wanted to ask if anyone has been in a situation with a poorly patient who is rapidly getting worse, sat in the rain, chaos all around, and then had to fill out a check-list to decide if we pop an aspirin under their tongue? Final point I say to students who ask me this when I am teaching FAW, If in doubt call 999/112. They will advise aspirin and then you can just blame them! Job done. http://www.bhf.org.uk/he...itions/heart-attack.aspx
Canopener  
#29 Posted : 07 July 2011 09:36:36(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Canopener

TEH, I agree I think the question has been answered adequately and pretty rationally. Both the HSE and the NHS and BHF recommend this course of action, and I think we can reasonably assume that they have come to this conclusion that on the basis of some balanced reasoning, rather than a total stab in the dark. I too was ‘surprised’ at the ‘gratuitous’ copy/pasting of material from an unknown source, especially as that did not enable any of us to get any context for what was being said, which isn’t of course particularly helpful in any situation. In the case, at least in part, it appears, to have been misleading or at least not especially relevant to the discussion of using aspirin for acute treatment of a suspected heart attack. Thank you Jane for providing some context and clarity.
John J  
#30 Posted : 07 July 2011 09:58:14(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
John J

Personal experience from 3 weeks ago after self presenting at hospital was that I was given an aspirin as a precaution based on my symptoms (tight chest/difficulty breathing). It wasn't a heart attack as it turned out but it's the same recommendation treatment I would expect from our first aiders.
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.