Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Reid21915  
#1 Posted : 03 July 2011 17:59:10(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
Reid21915

The situation involves top road loading where operators are required to refuel tankers. A risk assessment and local work practice for the site is available but the operators are still not happy with arrangements. The road loading involves a moveable platform resting in the top of the truck. Netting is provided at the end to avoid anyone falling. Both the truck driver and operator uses harnesses which are attached to one (total two on structure of the top surface as a metal pole rail 1.5 cm diameter) on the top half of the movable platform. Standing beside the metal pole/rail the attachment rests at waist height. Area between the top of the tanker and the loading / control structure is about 4/5 meters above the ground. The operators are concerned that the attachment/anchor point for the harness is not above head height and are concerned that if they fell the attaching connection may not hold their weight or the combined weight of two people. Besides ensuring the arrangement for the layout and load bearing weights of the structure the operators feel they need some external / professional training in use of harnesses, attachments, assessing harness and so on. I agreed with their concerns as a H&S trainer on site but wanted to ask outside opinion on the situation/issue I have at hand.
SNS  
#2 Posted : 03 July 2011 21:37:01(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
SNS

Hi, We have a similar situation. We trained the operators in pre-use inspection, putting on and taking off the harness using a contractor initially but now have a qualified trainer. Harnesses are issued to individuals against a signature and pre-use is their responsibility. 6 monthly done by contractor with an ID tag system. Any doubt on condition and they get a replacement pending re-inspection. We are also getting an on-site inspector trained - 2 day course. Using work positioning lanyards, not fall arrest straps as the distance is too short for fall arrest to work. The anchorage should also be inspected to ensure that it would meet the worst case load - sorry I don't have those details to hand. Is it feasible for the load bay or bays to have a fixed gantry and drive each tanker through? We had one one which was out of date and it will be replaced and updated when funding allows. Newer tankers are moving to ground load and control - do you need to update the vehicles to rule out top loading? Rgds, S
Kate  
#3 Posted : 04 July 2011 09:53:41(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Kate

I'm having difficulty visualising the arrangement you describe. But you can get a portable gantry which is essentially an adjustable ladder on wheels with a cage at the top, giving good barriers against falling, but without a floor to the cage (so you stand on the tanker surrounded by bottom, mid and top handrails). Would that work in this situation?
MEden380  
#4 Posted : 04 July 2011 14:41:01(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
MEden380

Reid21915 Firstly as Kate has said, can't you bottom fill the tanker? most are now done this way. Failing that try contacting T B Davies of Cardiff www.tbdavies.co.uk as they sell a product Pinnacle Tankmaster Access Platform. This is an independant wheeled accessplatform that can also be height adjusted. (I don't work for them, just use them for access equipment).
mickc  
#5 Posted : 04 July 2011 15:32:47(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
mickc

My company www.mcssafetysystems.co.uk designs and installs overhead fall arrest rolling gantry systems for this purpose do the operators carry out this work on site? or at your yard? is it a fixed anchor point rolling trolley or a horizontal lifeline? BS EN 795:1997 states an Anchorage should not fail when it arrests the fall of a mass of 100kg from a distance of 2.5 metres.
Kate  
#6 Posted : 04 July 2011 15:40:19(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Kate

Credit where it's due, it was SNS who suggested bottom loading. The product MEden refers to looks to be based on the same principle as the one I was describing although it looks somewhat different from the one that I've seen.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.