Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
tman1862  
#1 Posted : 03 July 2011 23:39:07(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
tman1862

hi i work for a large chemical company, as a safety rep .we have a problem where the company wants us to wear safety glasses across the whole site initally this is good but in the warehouse where they work at different heights and with computer screens and glaring lights as they look up, it is a problem .we looked into it and the whole company agreed it was a special place where the company could make a exception as long as they were not in close proximity of any chemicals. now they seem to want to renege on this and we need to put a questionaire together to back up what we have done without bias so we need a standard questionaire or at least questions to ask the workforce.problems people are having are headaches and eyestrain people drive forklifts looking upwards all the time and have computer screens close to their faces.
SteveL  
#2 Posted : 04 July 2011 07:57:02(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
SteveL

This is nothing new, most MCG construction sites require that you now wear eye protection at all times, this includes scaffolders, machine operators, and ground workers who will be looking up at bright lights, (if the sun shines long enough). This was a concern in the beginning, but now that the majority are used to them you just get on with it. Not saying that agree but when told, wear or or lose job then you wear them.
RayRapp  
#3 Posted : 04 July 2011 08:43:33(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
RayRapp

As stevel says, in construction mandatory eye protection is the norm. There are may types of safety glasses available and a good supplier should be able to help. There is no doubt that for some activities safety glasses can be difficult to wear and perhaps those using VDUs should be excused from wearing them, particularly if they use prescription glasses. Alternatively, the company could provide prescription safety glasses for those who require them - not cheap. The use of eye protection should only implemented where there is a real risk and affords sensible protection - not necessarily a blanket rule. As for the questionnaire, I suggest a Likert 3 point scale type (Agree, Don't Agree or Disagree, Disagree) with statements or questions, I prefer statements as a rule. What questions/statements to include would have to be given some thought and based on the tasks as well as the working environment. There are some do's and don'ts when designing a survey. For example, ideally to avoid bias you need a variety of negative and positive statements. Q1. 'I find wearing safety glasses gives me a headache' = Negative Q2. 'I am able to work normally when wearing safety glasses' = Positive
Ron Hunter  
#4 Posted : 04 July 2011 12:08:23(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ron Hunter

The purpose of PPE is (last resort etc.) to counter a specified risk. I'm less than comfortable with the adoption of these "blanket" approaches. If eye protection is becoming the "accepted norm" in construction today, will we be applying the same logic to RPE tomorrow?
Judex  
#5 Posted : 04 July 2011 12:55:11(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Judex

Strongly agree with Ron on this issue. It seems that wearing PPE is becoming a “facility solution” instead of a more in-depth solution exercise. Is the regular replacement of PPE at end of the day is more economical on the long run when compare to investment in overall protective asset? It is also an “acceptable norm” for the mutli-national group I’m presently working even in no risk area / situation.
SteveL  
#6 Posted : 04 July 2011 15:33:55(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
SteveL

Ron, Judex Totally agree with you, but the MCG have the work and they make the rules. They use CDM, requests by PC and site rules, to justify the fact that they will only allow you on site with eye protection, and hand protection, along with CSCS or CPCS or accepted cards. Keeps the manufacturing economy going for the production of said items, so nobody with any power will speak out. Painter in hospital room has to wear complete PPE including hard hat. Its rules and they will be obeyed. Not even allowed the wearing of shorts in hot weather on sites now. Glad not long to retirement, or actually working on site any more.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.