Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
firesafety101  
#1 Posted : 12 July 2011 11:08:11(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

MB1  
#2 Posted : 12 July 2011 11:18:50(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
MB1

No mention of being given a custodial sentence also! http://www.notts-fire.go...4F13AC31AB7F54E4CFB4.asp
smitch  
#3 Posted : 12 July 2011 11:26:23(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
smitch

Custodial sentance also mentioned here: http://www.notts-fire.go...4F13AC31AB7F54E4CFB4.asp smitch
smitch  
#4 Posted : 12 July 2011 11:27:39(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
smitch

Doh should have read sentence and not sentance
firesafety101  
#5 Posted : 12 July 2011 11:33:26(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

The first line of the info4fire link states jailed for eight months!
David Bannister  
#6 Posted : 12 July 2011 12:08:59(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
David Bannister

That's great news for all competent fire risk assessors. I've lost no time in telling my clients!
smitch  
#7 Posted : 12 July 2011 12:21:15(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
smitch

MB1  
#8 Posted : 12 July 2011 12:26:01(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
MB1

Its pretty damming, especially when omitting basic safety systems regardless of sleeping accommodation or not!
firesafety101  
#9 Posted : 12 July 2011 13:39:52(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

Sentencing the two men, Judge Andrew Hamilton said the time had come to send out a message to those who conduct fire risk assessments and to hoteliers who are prepared to put profit before safety. He jailed the pair for eight months, and ordered Liu to pay £15,000 and O’Rourke £5862 in prosecution costs. “If employers are unsure about their own ability to undertake a fire risk assessment within their premises, they should seek advice from a competent person,” said Ian Taylor, fire protection group manager at Nottinghamshire Fire and Rescue Service. He urged employers to establish competency by asking for references and evidence of fire safety training and qualifications, and checking whether potential advisers are registered or accredited with an appropriate body. Is this the first step on the road to required accreditation?
stuie  
#10 Posted : 12 July 2011 14:17:04(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
stuie

Sound to me as if it is Chris. Does anyone know if there were any warnings or advice given (which has been ignored) to the hotel owner prior to the prosecution or did the FB just go in and decide that the breaches were so significant it warranted immediate prosecution?
firesafety101  
#11 Posted : 12 July 2011 16:07:10(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

I only know as much as the story, but what I do know is that the attendance of the fire safety officer/s was a routine visit and not as a result of a fire. IMPO why shouldn't they prosecute if there were that many breaches, and they must have seen the fire risk assessment and decided it was very poor. I will see what my fire safety officer friend has to say and let you know.
stuie  
#12 Posted : 12 July 2011 16:44:17(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
stuie

Not saying that is wrong Chris - just curious to see if there was something that had gone on before - maybe the guy had been warned and he had ignored the warnings?
messyshaw  
#13 Posted : 12 July 2011 20:52:55(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
messyshaw

I note that the inspection team also issued a prohibition notice and they are never dished out lightly! Those of us on here who carry out FRAs for a living would I hope join me in admitting that it is possible to miss the odd problem: a missing sign, the latest EL test record, even a single door closer. After all, we're all human. But the list of very significant findings missed by this bloke represents much much more than a bad day in the office. Like stuff4blokes, I am not worried at all, as I know that 97% of my FRAs are on the button. It's the money grabbing idiot cowboys who should fear this case. My view is "Good riddance to bad rubbish, you are not welcome here" Congrats to Notts F&RS to take this landmark case to court, and where are the big boys (London, GMC, West Mids, Mersyside) as there are scores of similar incompetent wrong uns putting life at risk every day. Let' see some action from you lazy lot!!
firesafety101  
#14 Posted : 12 July 2011 21:09:44(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

Not defending Merseyside but they do prosecute, just not made vary public. I am informed that they have an excellent Barrister who covers Merseyside, Lancashire and Cheshire with lots of success. When I first read the heading I thought OMG! I started to feel comfortable as I read through the list, like messey says that has to be more than one bad day at the office. You may remember I recently started a discussion about a fra I did and asked about fire doors for a three storey office premises? I decided to make that requirement, among others, and apart from it not being a sleeping risk my list of recommended actions was very similar to those this chap missed out. Spooky really.
Andrew W Walker  
#15 Posted : 13 July 2011 09:02:52(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Andrew W Walker

Talking of fire risk assessments & management. As part of my development this is a field I'd like to break into. I am comfortable with what I need to do in my current position, the FRS are quite happy with our arrangements, as are our insurers. We are not a high risk company. My question is: What qualifications would be beneficial if I want to progress into this area? Would a NEBOSH Fire Cert be a good starting point? I am currently in retail & distribution. Many thanks Andy
RayRapp  
#16 Posted : 13 July 2011 10:45:03(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
RayRapp

An interesting case, clearly there was negligence and professional misconduct. I have done some fire inspections and FRAs, it appears to be yet another add on to h&s since the introduction of the RRSFO. However, the properties have mainly been my employers premises, such as offices, stores, etc. Last year an engineer ordered some doubled stacked porta cabins for a project. There was no fire fighting equipment, alarms, smoke/heat detectors, fire blanket, signage, etc. I asked the engineer why he had ordered cabins the cabins like this and he said because they were cheap - not so cheap after I got them fitted out! The construction manager asked why I needed to do this and a FRA, bearing in mind it was temporary accommodation and low risk. I answered because it was a legal requirement under the RRFSO, which does not distinguish between permanent and temporary accommodation.
Safety Smurf  
#17 Posted : 13 July 2011 11:06:49(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Safety Smurf

Motorhead wrote:
Talking of fire risk assessments & management. As part of my development this is a field I'd like to break into. I am comfortable with what I need to do in my current position, the FRS are quite happy with our arrangements, as are our insurers. We are not a high risk company. My question is: What qualifications would be beneficial if I want to progress into this area? Would a NEBOSH Fire Cert be a good starting point? I am currently in retail & distribution. Many thanks Andy
Hi Andy, I work in the same field as you, I've done the NEBOSH Fire Cert which I sat off of the back of doing the L2P course at the Fire Sevice College. From what I've discovered subsequently, the L2P course seems to have more depth of content than the NEBOSH fire cert course.
firesafety101  
#18 Posted : 13 July 2011 11:22:25(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

Ray you were right to do a separate fra for the cabins as the rrfso as applied to construction requires a separate assessment for temp. accommodation. Well done.
firesafety101  
#19 Posted : 13 July 2011 11:27:35(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

Motorhead I would suggest the NEBOSH cert as a starter but I know a few people who have failed that, it put them off from going further. The Fire Service College courses lead to membership of FPA and their list of fire risk assessors, this could be the way to go as I think the requirement for accreditation is on the way. Whatever training you go for nothing beats experience and the more fra's you can do the better. Start with what you consider to be low risk premises and work your way up. Good luck.
firesafety101  
#20 Posted : 13 July 2011 11:33:45(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

Motorhead and all, I am not related in any way to the following link but attended such a day last year and found it to be very good. It may be a good starting point for newcomers to fire risk assessment for an insight into what you need to know. I don't know how much this one is but last year's cost me £50.00 and we were fed and watered. Well worth the money. http://www.warringtoncertification.com/fracs.html
Andrew W Walker  
#21 Posted : 13 July 2011 12:58:40(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Andrew W Walker

Thanks Chris & Safety Smurf. This is something that I am interested in, so should be fun doing it! The course in MK is not possible at the moment- doing a Lead Auditors course that week, I will look at further courses. As these are all self funded I will have to spread things out. Andy
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.