Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Killeen44565  
#1 Posted : 14 July 2011 01:31:41(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Killeen44565

I am assisting a 3rd level college, I am reviewing the Topic PPE. Firstly if the college has a number of workshops, where Safety Shoes, Overalls, Protective Gloves, Safety Goggles, is worn what is reasonable as regards the FREQUENCY of replacing these items. I have set up a PPE Register (which they did not have before ). As this is a teaching environment and the workshops would operate 4 hours a day adverage ( that it is not a heavy industrial environment, my question is what would be considered reasonable as regards the freqency of purchasing new protective clothing and items to be worn by staff. My research here is that there may be individuals requesting items very frequently ( and as there was no record of items that had been signed out etc , there is an indication that there may be certain individuals taking advantage of no tracking system or previous record. It has been said that certain staff may use the PPE for work outside the college. If under the PPE regulations, employees are required to reasonably use maintain, care and store PPE. What would be reasonable as regards the frequency of purchasing such equipment in this environment by the employer. The Employer is compliant and providing all necessary PPE to its staff. I would be so happy and grateful to hear your views on this Topic.
Judex  
#2 Posted : 14 July 2011 06:09:06(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Judex

We had even noted in my present place of work that employee sold their most recently safety shoes provided and continue to wear previous one and Bolley tinted spectacle submitted is worn at sea beaches when off work. Our local regulation (Mauritius) required renewal every year in the construction sector or early replacement due to wear and tear. Good idea to implement tracking record to avoid abuse. This will give you the trend for replacement and also make comparison among employees doing the same task(s). I can advise you to make an exchange system policy; employee needs to return the previous one for checking and if defect is confirmed then you replace and discard returned ones.
Killeen44565  
#3 Posted : 14 July 2011 09:08:14(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Killeen44565

Exchange system policy, very good idea. Than you Judex. Killeen
John J  
#4 Posted : 14 July 2011 09:59:31(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
John J

Killeen, Nobody will be able to give you a definitive answer as workplaces and employees vary so wildly. You may, however, quickly find that your register delivers your answers for you. If you trend the information you will quickly spot areas for improvement and understand how your PPE performs in use. This allows you to improve training/understanding of PPE care and use, spot individuals who may not look after it, identify PPE that does not perform well, understand your costs in relation to PPE spend (cheap PPE is often anything but cheap due to frequent replacement) and manage your PPE program effectivelly. I would urge caution and say do not assume that one employee using PPE more frequently means they are not looking after it. Shoes are a good example, not everybody walks the same and this affects how quickly they wear out.
kdrum  
#5 Posted : 14 July 2011 10:46:08(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
kdrum

Killeen I too work in a college and in the past staff ordered replacement PPE every year when they ordered for new students, the difference being that staff PPE comes out the H&S budget. Due to the nature of courses some staff had fairly expensive gear and like you mentioned had other jobs outside the college where they likely used the kit we supplied. We have now implemented a register and all staff sign for gear when issued and is replaced when it is no longer doing the job or is damaged, not every year as a matter of course
Killeen44565  
#6 Posted : 14 July 2011 23:34:45(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Killeen44565

John and kdrum, thank you for your response. Its true there is no definitive answer, employers though would like a definitive answer!. Thank you John and Kdrum for all that information. I will start the process of a register and signing of on PPE used and as judex had mentioned giving the old back, before the new is issued. Thank You all. Killeen
Kim Hedges  
#7 Posted : 15 July 2011 00:42:55(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Kim Hedges

In a company I worked for, they held a record of all P.P.E. issued to an individual, replacements were (as said previously), a one for one replacement (or better version). If staff wished to use their own bought P.P.E. that was fine so long as it came up to the required standard. As for selling safety boots - not being able to produce the signed out property was an seen as incident on their record, you were allowed 3 incidents (no matter what it was) and then it was instant dismissal, but you could still re-apply for your old job. Heavy gloves were often replaced fortnightly due to them coming into contact with battery acid. Checks of P.P.E. were conducted on all staff prior to them going on leave (usually 3-4 times a year) and those items left in a secured area.
Canopener  
#8 Posted : 15 July 2011 20:09:03(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Canopener

I may be totally ,missing the point, but surely PPE needs replacing as often as is necessary? i.e. when it's worn, out, broken, lost etc! Individuals taking advantage of a system, or the absence of a system is a slightly different matter.
mgray  
#9 Posted : 16 July 2011 06:54:49(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
mgray

Hi Killeen I'm with Phil on this PPE should in my view be replaced as is required not because of frequency or budgets dictate. I also do a register and replace old for new as required. However I do go one step further as we have a policy which all employees sign to say they have read, which states that PPE can only be used on company business. It is very much discouraged to use it back and forth to work or for any other activity such as using your boots down on the allotment? They all have individual lockers which are dry and safe so we encourage them to keep all PPE in them when not in use. I will say that I agree about cheap PPE it is not always being cheap especially boots and driving. The constant flexing of the sole reduces the life of a cheap boot considerably plus comfort should always be second on the list after the required standard has been selected, if you want compliance. MG
Killeen44565  
#10 Posted : 16 July 2011 16:08:29(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Killeen44565

mgray, Phil Rose and Kim, appreciate all your posts. Thanks for taking the time and all the posts have been a great help. Thanks. Killeen
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.