Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Shaz  
#1 Posted : 15 July 2011 13:23:43(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
Shaz

Quick question - would a dead mans switch (DMS) be sufficient (basically it would just be that the person let go of the control) or do i need to get an additional e stop. Searched for answer and was going with DMS sufficient however concerned that in emergency occassionally people grip to whatever they are holding so do i need E Stop?? Got to the point I am going round in circles. Any advice most appreciated. Thank you
martin1  
#2 Posted : 15 July 2011 13:42:57(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
martin1

Can't find anything written down on this but I'd go with your logic. We are more used to having to press something to stop machinery than having to hold something. Sounds like you need a big red button.
HSSnail  
#3 Posted : 15 July 2011 13:48:26(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
HSSnail

Shaz A little more info n the equipment/hazards may help people advise you on this. I suspect there are situations that require one or other of these devises and some which require both - dare I say it what does your risk assessment say? Brian
Shaz  
#4 Posted : 15 July 2011 13:52:24(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
Shaz

Cheers for that - RA says E stop but very experienced electricians have questioned why e stop if DMS on machine. I was hoping that i had just missed the black and white reg/acop that would say - 'Must have additional E-stop' It is a mitre saw in a joinery workshop - as soon as control is let go it stops however still going with what I think on e stop but would have liked to have backed up my reasoning with something from HSE or industry. Thanks for answers so far tho
PIKEMAN  
#5 Posted : 15 July 2011 14:07:44(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
PIKEMAN

I would say go for the estop as well. What if, for whatever reason, the operator was unable to let go of the DMS?? Or it got stuck or some idiot wired it shut?
stevie40  
#6 Posted : 15 July 2011 14:56:52(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
stevie40

Is the DMS a 2 button set up requiring 2 hands to operate and remote from the machine? This kind of thing is common on "nodding donkey" double mitre saws often found in glazing fabrication shops. Memory failed me on the E-stop arrangements for these (been a while since I saw a double glazing firm) but a quick google image search found this for instance - http://www.haffnergb.com/page/sawing Half way down the page is a Pertic 332p double mitre saw with E-stop plainly visible. Other images of these saws show similar arrangements.
Shaz  
#7 Posted : 15 July 2011 15:27:26(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
Shaz

thanks for all your advice I have contacted the manufacturer to seek their advice for the machine in question and they have said that a seperate e stop should not be put in place in addition to the DMS as it interferes with the braking system. The DMS is enough to stop it due to where it is located, etc. They did say that they have whole workshops connected to 1 e stop however this is not possible in the workshop we have or with the equipment we operate. Thanks again Shaz
HSSnail  
#8 Posted : 15 July 2011 15:31:38(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
HSSnail

Shaz Black & white ACOP requirement - where would the fun in this forum be if we had those? Seriously having had a look at the images stevie40 as proved, I think you are looking at PUWER reg 15. If you release the DMS how quickly does the saw stop? If this is a slow process then I would expect an estop linked to some appropriate breaking system. Brian
HSSnail  
#9 Posted : 15 July 2011 15:33:28(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
HSSnail

Shaz Sorry we were obviously drafting our post at the same time, it was only after I hit Post that I saw you had consulted the manufacturer. Brian
stevie40  
#10 Posted : 15 July 2011 15:41:38(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
stevie40

Manufacturers don't always get it right though. Not saying that is the case here, but I've seen guarding oversights made by European manufacturers in the last 5 yrs.
Zimmy  
#11 Posted : 18 July 2011 09:25:19(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Zimmy

Someone has confused emergency stopping and emergency switching? Please refer to Part 2 BS7671:2008 as amended. Zimmy
Zimmy  
#12 Posted : 18 July 2011 09:36:54(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Zimmy

Me again If a person has passed out, fit, stroke, heart attack or slips and falls into a machine then remote operation is vital. An E stop CAN and should be fitted. If the manufacture says otherwise then a redesign on the machine is called for or a alternative manufacture used. Perhaps the person who ordered the machine needs to be asked about his/her choice? Re the electricians? mmmm nuff said Zimmy
Chrishutcheson  
#13 Posted : 18 July 2011 12:59:17(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Chrishutcheson

I have experience (albeit with different type of equipment) whereby the worker secured the DMS with wire so he didn't have to hold it down. If the person had an accident or something went wrong then someone else should be able to switch the machinery off i.e. Big red button. Obviously they shouldn't be using the wire to hold to DMS down but that's a different subject altogether.
Chrishutcheson  
#14 Posted : 18 July 2011 12:59:17(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Chrishutcheson

I have experience (albeit with different type of equipment) whereby the worker secured the DMS with wire so he didn't have to hold it down. If the person had an accident or something went wrong then someone else should be able to switch the machinery off i.e. Big red button. Obviously they shouldn't be using the wire to hold to DMS down but that's a different subject altogether.
paul.skyrme  
#15 Posted : 18 July 2011 22:32:15(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
paul.skyrme

zimmy, It could be argued, successfully I believe that BS7671 does not apply if you check the definitions then it precludes itself from applying to machinery, the relevant standard referred to in the HSE ACOP on PUWER98 is BS EN 60204-1 this is currently in Amd dated 2009 IIRC, mine is not here. All, IMHO, IF the machine is CE marked then you should not modify it without re- CE marking it as a one off, else you can never comply with PUWER98 requirements. If the machine relies on dc injection braking then you must not remove the mains electric supply when stopping the machine. The best I can point you in the direction of for examples is central emergency switching systems in school class rooms, these are under BS4163, not relevant here, however, these e-stop rings that cut power to all of the machines are required in this environment, however, there is a published HSE document and in the text of 4163, that dc injection braking and central switching are an excluded combination. So, unless you know how the machine is braked then you should not modify the supply circuit to remove power. If you can't post the machine make and model then please PM and I will ask the manufacturers again, as I have close links with many of the wood machine manufacturers and importers (agents) in the UK. If the machine is not braked then if there is possible access to the tool during run down then as I understand it your risk assessment should show that braking is required and by now it should be fitted as the change over time has elapsed. If the machine is not dc braked then it may have an electro magnetic brake which brakes automatically on being de-energised, so on release of the hold to run button the machine will brake to a halt. The other possibility is that the machine is designed with such drag that it inherently stops within the requirements of the standards. I would caution you very politely on believing what your electricians say as there will be many who will not be trained in the requirements of machinery electrical safety if they are installation electricians working to BS7671 as this does not cover machinery, see above. You can even defeat the big red button if you try all machinery and guarding can be defeated, that is down to management control. Without understanding more about the machine and the physical install I feel that it is difficult to say any more. How far should this be taken, remember power tools are hold to run switches, pistol drills, angle grinders, chop saws, sanders, jigsaws etc. these are not fitted with emergency stops.
Zimmy  
#16 Posted : 19 July 2011 09:36:42(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Zimmy

Hi Paul Re the first post and no. 7 point taken and I stand corrected. Indeed, if electrical braking is used then to withdraw supply o the braking system is fool hardy. However I feel that a remote emergency switch that energizes the braking system whilst removing the ac power train to the motor should and could be installed with the manufactures permission? Again, if not possible then change the machine to one that does have that added safety system. Regarding the 'How far should this be taken, remember power tools are hold to run switches, pistol drills, angle grinders, chop saws, sanders, jigsaws etc. These are not fitted with emergency stops' This is quite a different issue as I'm sure you will agree if indeed they are as I understand it, portable hand held items. Zimmy
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.