Rank: Forum user
|
This is a little bit of a grey area for myself, it states in CAR 2006 that asbestos awareness training should be carried out at regular intervals IS THIS ANNUALLY! and does every operative need it or could just the team leader possess it and instruct the rest of the operatives if an incident was to occur.We are an electrical company carrying out works for housing associations.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Try hsg 227 and 213. Free from the HSE web site. 213 being the one you're looking for I think
Zimmy
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
AS I RECALL THE REQUIREMENT FOR REFRESHER TRAINING IS ANNUALLY BUT IF YOU READ THROUGH HSG 264? IT SAYS SOMETHING ALONG THE LINES THAT ALTHOUGH TRAINING NEEDS TO BE REFERSHED ANNUALLY THIS DOES NOT AND SHOULD NOT JUST RE-ITTERATE ALL THE ORIGINAL TRAINING I.E. REPEAT THE SAME FULL TRAINING COURSE. THE PURPOSE OF THE TRAINING IS MORE TO ENSURE WORKERS ARE KEPT UP TO DATE WITH CHANGES TO REGULATIONS, BEST PRACTICE, TECHINIQUES, THIS DOES NOT HAVE TO TAKE THE FORM OF OFFICIAL TRAINING COURSES BUT CAN BE IN THE FORM OF TOOL BOX TALKS, IN HOUSE TRAINING ETC...
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
If memory serves me right it is the ACOP for the regulation that states annually as a refesher and even gives a brief outline fo the training areas to cover.
I think for the refresher (double check though) it also states that this can be included into normal H&S training i.e. does not have to be a full blown course every year.
regards
TSC
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
HI Guys, my understanding is that the training should be specific to the tasks at hand and this also applies to the refresher training. Don't forget to include any potential new areas of risk.
Stephen Smith
Sphere Risk Health And Safety Management LTD
http://www.sphererhsm.co.uk
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
My understanding is that promotion of commercial interests is not allowed on this form. Does the above post not fall into that category?
Jon
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
John M wrote:My understanding is that promotion of commercial interests is not allowed on this form. Does the above post not fall into that category?
Jon
I'd have to say yes.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Bottom kicking time then.
Z
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Mods are a bit slow off the mark on this one!! [insert smiley face]
Andy
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
If i had posted that the whole thread would have disappeared!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Same here - some time back I had a post pulled for mentioning (not promoting) an organisation for safety professionals. It appeared to rustle some feathers.
Jon
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
By the way ALL persons need it.
Yes somebody was quick off the mark with the advert
Bob
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
leerob wrote:This is a little bit of a grey area for myself, it states in CAR 2006 that asbestos awareness training should be carried out at regular intervals IS THIS ANNUALLY! and does every operative need it or could just the team leader possess it and instruct the rest of the operatives if an incident was to occur.We are an electrical company carrying out works for housing associations.
It states 'refresher training' should be given AT LEAST once a year and it should be tailored to meet the training needs of the individual, taking into account their experience, skills, knowledge, frequency of the work and their performance.
Every operative who may disturb Asbestos in the course of their work MUST have A/A Training.
Don't wish to worry you but in UKATA's presentation, it states that each week, 6 Electrician's die from Asbestos related disease (compared with 3 plumbers) so the operatives are in a high risk occupation.
I trust you have asked the H.A. for the results of any surveys they have had?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Leerob, the answer to your question lies within the L143 CAR06 ACoP - available as free pdf from HSE site.
Awareness training must be at least annually and provided to ALL employees likely to come into contact or disturb ACM - whether by accident or design.
ACoP on Reg 10 of CAR 06 is very specific in stating that refresher SHOULD NOT be a regurgitation of initial formal training, rather it may be a briefing on internal procedures, emergency arrangements or discussion of findings and actions arising from a related incident or near miss.
In short- it doean't mean an annual outlay of formal training by external provider for all your employees and refresher can be delivered in-house by competent experienced supervisors or managers.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
ron hunter wrote:Leerob, the answer to your question lies within the L143 CAR06 ACoP - available as free pdf from HSE site.
Awareness training must be at least annually and provided to ALL employees likely to come into contact or disturb ACM - whether by accident or design.
ACoP on Reg 10 of CAR 06 is very specific in stating that refresher SHOULD NOT be a regurgitation of initial formal training, rather it may be a briefing on internal procedures, emergency arrangements or discussion of findings and actions arising from a related incident or near miss.
In short- it doean't mean an annual outlay of formal training by external provider for all your employees and refresher can be delivered in-house by competent experienced supervisors or managers.
How does that work with the UKATA Card, Ron? Most of the larger companies insist on subcontractors receiving UKATA A/A and the subbies receive a card or certificate valid or 12 months.
Is there documentation available to extend it to two years subject to a person receiving info on 'internal procedures' etc?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Quite a few postings pullied consequential to the sins of AN Other.
Jon
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Quite simply frankc, the major contractors can set their own standards and their own rules for subcontractors and UKATA and other providers obviously have their own commercial interests to maintain, but any periodic expiry they might care to set (and 12 months is surely excessively restrictive) can only (at best) be considered advisory. (some might say misleading).
The ACOP is perfectly clear though: refresher training is NOT to be a periodic re-sit of the same training.
Have a read of the ACoP yourself frankc?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Totally with Ron on this. In fact I could well argue that the PC or contractor could be obliged under the regulations to provide specific training for the project if asbestos is known to be present or could be present due to age of the structure. This would then constitute refresher training.
I personally am against constant repitition of identical training courses, even more so where operatives encounter such situations on a reasonably regular basis. We should be endeavouring to raise knowledge and hence competence but this lazy use of the same course every 12 months actually, I believe, can switch off people from the message. Imagine if a practitioner was asked to attend a basic risk assessment course every 12 months. The words "bored to death and distraction" come to mind.
It is aqctually the same problem as the CSCS test only in spades - repitition of the same material
Bob
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I agree that too much training is simply in order to tick a box with little thought of the content and usefulness of the material. It is interesting to note the discussion about AW refresher training, in my experience compliance with AWT is very poor even by large organisations, let alone a refresher!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
I deliver Asbestos Awareness Training, and members of the IATP, Independent Asbestos Training Providers, and there has always been this "grey area" we have recently had a communication from HSE at Bootle
Quote: Refresher Training (ACOP L143 Paragraph 147)
Under Regulation 10 CAR 2006 employers have to ensure that every employee received relevant information, instruction and training and that this is given at regular intervals.
The relevant parts of the ACOP then build on this regulation to clarify the 3 types of training, content and who should receive each type of training. Paragraph 147 sets out the
requirements for refresher training.
Refresher training is applicable to all types of asbestos training including awareness training and should be given at least once a year. For workers who have previously
received awareness training their refresher training can included as part of a health & safety update or a tool box talk.
It is the employer’s responsibility to ensure that the
person or training provider, delivering the refresher training, in whatever format, is competent to do so.
The important point is that the worker is reminded and remains aware of the dangers of asbestos fibres. By following the ACOP including this paragraph the employer will be doing
enough to comply with the law."
It carries on into what should be on training certificates etc., , If anybody would like a copy of the full letter i would be pleased to email it!!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
ron hunter
The ACOP is perfectly clear though: refresher training is NOT to be a periodic re-sit of the same training.
Have a read of the ACoP yourself frankc?[/quote wrote:
I believe i made that point perfectly clear myself in a post on this very thread where i said 'refresher training' should be given AT LEAST once a year and it should be tailored to meet the training needs of the individual.
No periodic re-sit quoted there.
Have a read of #13 for yourself Ron.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Frankc, itwas not my intention to offend you. I fear you havemisconstrued my post.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
ron hunter wrote:Frankc, itwas not my intention to offend you. I fear you havemisconstrued my post.
I did think your response was off handish, tbh Ron, as i have a copy of the ACOP and have read it.
I was after advice or assisstance on what small companies can do to minimise their costs regarding having UKATA training. They need to have it to get the contracts with these clients and currently, they have to sit through a UKATA accredited course provider each year.
A company i work for tried to issue cards for two years with the proviso they have refresher training by way of toolbox talks specific to the type of work the contractor does but UKATA stopped it, saying they couldn't guarantee the contractor would deliver the toolbox talks.
Apologies for grasping the wrong end.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Frankc and Ron
I think we are basically on the same hymn sheet but many PCs, Clients and potentially UKATA are not in the same place. For reasons of their own they want to see repitition of teh acop syllabus - so demonstrating a possible lack of confidence in the subject. I do think though that too many safety and other persons think they are capable of delivering the training even as TBT. It is a subject that does require definitive experience of working with asbestos in some manner.
Bob
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
frankc, Bob, et al; I think we share a common concern that issues of 'competency' are being dealt with by rote as opposed to a demonstration of developed and specific learning and understanding.
I was initially tempted to mention CSCS in this same context, and I note that others have anyway.
I honestly don't know how we resolve this other than to lobby HSE and perhaps IOSH to set matters straight. I've no axe to grind with UKATA or IATP here, however this annual regurgitation is surely wrong.
If as Sallyod says, HSE have written out to clarify matters, then I think the HSE need to be publishing this on their asbestos topic web pages. Particularly the bit about "what should be on training certificates" etc.
Sallyod - I'd be obliged if you could PM me with the letter you mention attached? I'm guessing Bob and frankc would be interested too!
frankc - apologies again, previous post was somewhat curt, but well-intentioned.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
ron hunter wrote:
I honestly don't know how we resolve this other than to lobby HSE and perhaps IOSH to set matters straight. I've no axe to grind with UKATA or IATP here, however this annual regurgitation is surely wrong.
Completely agree.
If as Sallyod says, HSE have written out to clarify matters, then I think the HSE need to be publishing this on their asbestos topic web pages. Particularly the bit about "what should be on training certificates" etc.
Completely agree
Sallyod - I'd be obliged if you could PM me with the letter you mention attached? I'm guessing Bob and frankc would be interested too!
My copy arrived yesterday, Ron :-) (Thanks Sally)
frankc - apologies again, previous post was somewhat curt, but well-intentioned.
Thanks Ron. If i could use the term 'money making scam' on here and point it in a certain direction, you know what my target would be. Training/Refresher Training needs to be clarified by the HSE and the accredited bodies for A/A.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Create a standard programme and require refresher is a absolute dream for money makers - it is like shelling peas and you apparently have the HSE saying you must - at least parliament has dictacted it.
Perhaps the HSE need to hit at those who constantly require repetition of the standard course every year!!!
Bob
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Couldnt agree more! it is the main large Principle Contractors who are asking for UKATA or IATP certs every year. and the membership rates that UKATA charge for training providers has got to be recouped, hence pushing of courses every year.
Yes, I am a member of IATP but my "customers" are the smaller contractors, who enjoy low cost but quality training!! and our now accepted as well as UKATA ones.....
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Good luck with getting the HSE to clarify this. They'll just point you in the direction of the ACoP and rely on you to interpret it correctly. It's easy for license holders, they have to do it. But not so easy for everybody else. At least that's how I see it.
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.