IOSH forums home
»
Our public forums
»
OSH discussion forum
»
More details on the fire risk assesor jailed..
Rank: Forum user
|
http://www.chad.co.uk/ne...nsfield_hotels_1_3570739
Seems he did it for £150 and a few pints, no qualifications and seems he mainly sold extinguishers, a partly read the Official guidance on sleeping accommodation.
Just to put some argument on this, where does it say in the fire safety order qualifications are needed?? Deffo an appeal is in order I think
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
hammer1 wrote:
Just to put some argument on this, where does it say in the fire safety order qualifications are needed?? Deffo an appeal is in order I think
Safety assistance
18.—(1) The responsible person must, subject to paragraphs (6) and (7), appoint one or more
competent persons to assist him in undertaking the preventive and protective measures.
Could the person describe himself as competent?
Andy
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Qual's may not be needed but competency is; seems to me that the judge felt he had niether the qualifications or compenecy to carry out the RA's.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
One must be competent surely? And qualifications go someway to show competence?
So if not competent how can a defence or appeal be mounted?
Zimmy
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
If the owner conducted the FRA himself and followed the sleeping accommodation guidance book as was the point the fire safety order was set out for in the 1st place, he would also not be deemed competent. It only mentions that the FRA to be 'suitable and sufficient' and not for the person doing the FRA to be competent.
Obviously as mentioned Article 18 state persons assisting should be competent, I suppose the fact he freely admitted to only reading a part of the Guidance was not a good move and doubt if he should use the same defence team again...Oops
In regards to appeal, I was thinking about the 8 month sentence and would try and have that reduced??
Just trying to play devils advocate here
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
How many different definitions of Competence can we come up with?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Competent =
Has to drink in same Pub, has to do it cheap (and a few pints chucked in), has to sell extinguishers for a living and finally only needs to read a few pages of the official guidance on fire safety to the premises concerned...
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
hammer1 wrote:http://www.chad.co.uk/news/local/alfreton/jailed_pair_put_profit_before_fire_safety_at_two_mansfield_hotels_1_3570739
Seems he did it for £150 and a few pints, no qualifications and seems he mainly sold extinguishers, a partly read the Official guidance on sleeping accommodation.
Just to put some argument on this, where does it say in the fire safety order qualifications are needed?? Deffo an appeal is in order I think
Where does it say £150.00 is too little or too much? Where does it say a fee must be charged?
How much should one charge for a fire risk assessment?
The correct government guide is sleeping accommodation and 144 pages, did Judge Hamilton get that wrong?
As he was a fire extinguisher salesman why had he not sold some up to date extinguishers to the owner?
Does the previous fire in January 2006 have any relevance to this case?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Competence (or competency) is the ability of an individual to perform a job properly. (Wikipedia)
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
From reading the report it seems as if even his 'routine' job (servicing fire extinguishers) was not even done - let alone properly. Maybe though the client instructed him not too - or failed to ask him to service them?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
ChrisBurns wrote:Competence (or competency) is the ability of an individual to perform a job properly. (Wikipedia)
In answer to your earlier question, Chris, competence is a combination of Training, Knowledge and experience....
(According to the A.C.W.A.H.T)....
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
You are right Frank but I would add the ability to make the correct decision.
That could be to decide you are not comptent to do something?
If, to be considered competent you need training, then that would lead to qualifications?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
ChrisBurns wrote:You are right Frank but I would add the ability to make the correct decision.
That could be to decide you are not comptent to do something?
If, to be considered competent you need training, then that would lead to qualifications?
Knowing one's limitations...
Maybe your experience and knowledge would determine that?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Cutting to the chase...the Judge saw the flaws in the FRA etc and clearly the guy was only doing it for beer money. No need to worry about the definition of competence in this particular case.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Just to clear up the competency issue:
1) Nowhere in the RRO does not state that he person completing the FRA needs to be competent, however the FRA does need to be suitable & sufficient.
2) I accept that Article 18 states:
18.—(1) The responsible person must, subject to paragraphs (6) and (7), appoint one or more competent persons to assist him in undertaking the PREVENTIVE & PROTECTIVE MEASURES (my capitals).
3) However, look at the definition of PREVENTIVE & PROTECTIVE MEASURES as in Article 2 and it states:
“preventive and protective measures” means the measures which have been identified by the responsible person IN CONSEQUENCE of a risk assessment as the general fire precautions he needs to take to comply with the requirements and prohibitions imposed on him by or under this Order;
Therefore, Article 18 applies to those who are assisting measures as identified from the FRA - ie AFTER the FRA has been completed. Therefore this Article does not apply to the assessor, but does apply to alarm engineers, chippies fitting fire doors, trainers etc.
So to sum up, the risk assessor does not need to be competent, but his/her FRA must be suitable and sufficient. Don't argue with me as I never wrote this legislation. It's not dissimilar to saying the Jet pilot doesn't have to be competent as long as he takes off, flies and then lands safely!!
* As far as any prosecution goes, any person carrying out a FRA can be treated as the Responsible Person - Article 5(4)(b) refers. As a result, s/he can be prosecuted for failing to complete a S&S FRA as required by Article 9(1).
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Messey calm down calm down, no body's arguing with you :o)
"If you read the guide and decide that you are unable to apply the guidance, then you should seek expert advice from a competent person.
More complex premises will probably need to be assessed by a person who has comprehensive training or experience in fire risk assessment."
page 5 guidance document on fra sleeping accommodation.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I'd go for the definition of competence given in the guidance to the Management regs:
Knows the job
Knows their own limitations
Knows where to go for advice when they don't know the answer,
John
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
They were not jailed because they got it wrong, nor for not being "not qualified".
They were jailed because:
"The Judge said that the time had come to send out a message to those who conduct Fire Risk Assessments and to hoteliers who are prepared to put profit before safety"
Doubtless they are already out on appeal.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
messyshaw wrote:Just to clear up the competency issue:
1) Nowhere in the RRO does not state that he person completing the FRA needs to be competent, however the FRA does need to be suitable & sufficient.
2) I accept that Article 18 states:
18.—(1) The responsible person must, subject to paragraphs (6) and (7), appoint one or more competent persons to assist him in undertaking the PREVENTIVE & PROTECTIVE MEASURES (my capitals).
3) However, look at the definition of PREVENTIVE & PROTECTIVE MEASURES as in Article 2 and it states:
“preventive and protective measures” means the measures which have been identified by the responsible person IN CONSEQUENCE of a risk assessment as the general fire precautions he needs to take to comply with the requirements and prohibitions imposed on him by or under this Order;
Therefore, Article 18 applies to those who are assisting measures as identified from the FRA - ie AFTER the FRA has been completed. Therefore this Article does not apply to the assessor, but does apply to alarm engineers, chippies fitting fire doors, trainers etc.
So to sum up, the risk assessor does not need to be competent, but his/her FRA must be suitable and sufficient. Don't argue with me as I never wrote this legislation. It's not dissimilar to saying the Jet pilot doesn't have to be competent as long as he takes off, flies and then lands safely!!
* As far as any prosecution goes, any person carrying out a FRA can be treated as the Responsible Person - Article 5(4)(b) refers. As a result, s/he can be prosecuted for failing to complete a S&S FRA as required by Article 9(1).
Thank you for clarifying my point Messy.
Also it may state you should seek specialist advice in the official guidance, but this is not mentioned anywhere in the fire safety order.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
There you go, Chris. There's another answer to your question.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I am certain that most of us that use this forum are competent, the others may not be competent but that will come with time.
There are so many different definitions but they all mean the same in the end.
You don't know what you don't know so don't be afraid to ask.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
ChrisBurns wrote:
You don't know what you don't know so don't be afraid to ask.
Unless you don't need to know then you wouldn't need to ask would you?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
frankc wrote:ChrisBurns wrote:
You don't know what you don't know so don't be afraid to ask.
Unless you don't need to know then you wouldn't need to ask would you?
You still have to ask, in order to find out if you need to know.....
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Only a fool steps outside his/her spare of expert knowledge and even then measure twice and cut once. If you think you know it all what are you doing in the world of health and safety.
Zimmy
|
|
|
|
IOSH forums home
»
Our public forums
»
OSH discussion forum
»
More details on the fire risk assesor jailed..
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.