Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Allen29883  
#1 Posted : 23 August 2011 16:06:29(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Allen29883

I recently read an article on the Safety & Health Practitioner website regarding the benefits of workplace exercise, being active during breaks and it's link in to staff well being and morale. This also links in nicely to a positive safety culture in my view. My organsiation is good enough to provide onsite fitness facilties and allows staff the time to use them. This helps with my company culture. I make a point during my staff induction training of pointing out how the welfare provisions provided by an employer can link into a positive culture and positve thinking workforce. It is a complete opposite of what I have experienced in the past when working in manufacturing/warehousing.

Has anyone else got any good or bad examples of how the provision of decent welfare facilities/fitness facilities have helped to improved the culture within their organisation or within an organisation you are dealing with?

http://www.bluechip.co.u...efits-workplace-exercise
Birchall31628  
#2 Posted : 25 August 2011 08:34:39(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Birchall31628

Just a thing that we have done - we buy lots of fresh fruit most days for staff to pick as they chose. It's not to encourage them to eat at their desks though!
MaxPayne  
#3 Posted : 25 August 2011 08:48:53(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
MaxPayne

Large Local authority with large leisure facilities at it's disposal = Zero discount on entry or membership fees and encouragement for staff to use these and/or encourage healthy living also very low. I could go on, but this is obviously a bad example; as for a supply of fresh fruit....unthinkable!
Andrew Bober  
#4 Posted : 25 August 2011 10:26:49(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Andrew Bober

Exercise should be looked at in context to the varying ages of your workforce as well. Within me, we have a very high post-40 year group.

For men and women alike, the 40s bring the first great opportunity to reassess, take charge, repair neglect, and remake the rest of your life. However, thanks to breakthroughs in medicine, health, exercise, and nutrition, a fortysomething today has a chance to live longer, stronger and leaner – to remake his body into a sleeker, fitter, stronger version of its younger self. However, it isn’t necessarily easy.

The most typical problems attributed to aging have less to do with actual ageing than with the sedentary way more than 70% of the population choose to spend their lives. Its never to late to build muscle. It’s just different. When we were 20, our bodies could do anything to shape up. Form 40 onward, we have to be a lot smarter about it. Exercise physiologist, nutritionist and gerontologists now agree that during the decade of your 40s, men and women still have enormous potential for getting leaner and stronger, improving energy level and brain function, and transforming decades of bad habits into healthier lifestyle that will prime them for smooth sailing the rest of their lives.

The 10-year span between the ages 40 and 50 is critically important because the habits formed during this decade will chart the course for all those that follow. In your twenties and thirties, you had the luxury of time. You could eat badly, stay our late, work out when the spirit moved you. You could let yourself of without worrying much about your health. Frankly, that’s no longer the case. At the very least, living like that will pile on the pounds. More likely, your health will suffer. Heart disease and diabetes can hunt you down if you’re not vigilant.

A good offence, as the saying goes, is the best defence. So, to avoid medical problems, schedule regular physical exams. Men can tend to adopt the “if it isn’t broke, don’t fix it” mentality toward health care, general seeing a doctor only when something’s wrong.

If you doctor is on the ball, they should have given you a major baseline physical exam around the age of 30. If you haven’t had one yet, ask for it. It should include routine stuff such as a head-to-toe physical examination, urinalysis, hearing and vision tests, a neurological exam, urinalysis, pulmonary-function test, skin cancer check, throat check, and a review of your family health history. But it should also involve more advanced screens such as a complete blood count, body-fat test, bone-density screen, chest x-ray, stress test, kidney and liver function tests, and thyroid function test.

That’s a solid baseline checkups for the 30-year old and a general guideline for future check-ups. You should add a baseline Electrocardiograph/Elektrokardiogramm (ECG/EKG) to check for heart rhythm abnormalities to check for heart abnormalities – and to add to your doctor’s file. Do this in your early 40s if you haven’t done so already./ Now, do yourself a favour and ask your doctor’s office to pre-schedule you for a annual physical near you birthday. Each passing year’s celebration of your birth is a reminder to give yourself the best birthday present of all – a clean bill health.

Naturally, the problem will be how you engage your workforce in reengaging themselves. I would suggest getting some base-line OH work done to assess the overall health/fitness of the workforce. Non-invasive stuff. If you were able to get a cross section of your staff to be given health checks then you could use that as base line stats, which should be anonymous:

• Gender
• Age
• Height
• Weight
• Ethnicity (as some health issues are increased within certain ethic group)
• BMI
• Blood pressure
• Lifestyle habits (diet, drinking and smoking)
• Hours of exercise per week
• Pre-existing health conditions

NB: this is beyond health surveillance and you should approach doing this with your workforce with complete transparency. It is also important to note that the data is Health Data which can only be managed by those defined by the Health Professions Order – which we don’t fit (although some comments have been made alluding to indifference, case law is there and not following this is simply criminal. In our trade we cannot live by one rule for one and one rule for the other).

All this should then give you the indication of what intervention programmes you should implement. You have to remember that one-regime doesn’t fit all. You should also bear in mind that simply by offer reduced gym membership will not mean that this is taken. The best method is to then employ the services of a PTI to come up with some gym-free techniques which can be adopted and promoted within your organization. Especially doing things in the office.

A couple of good links for this would be:

‘The gym-free strength workout’ http://www.menshealth.co...ym-free-strength-workout

‘The no-gym workout’ http://www.menshealth.co.../the-no-gym-workout-9577

‘The urban gym workout’ http://www.menshealth.co...rcises/urban-gym-workout (with some nice illustrations)

‘5 Office Exercises’ http://www.foxnews.com/h.../08/04/office-exercises/

Andrew Böber CMSIOH FRPSH FRGS
Andrew Bober  
#5 Posted : 25 August 2011 10:28:07(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Andrew Bober

I'm only 38. Training at http://www.theforestgym.co.uk/ 4-5hrs a week to get back into fighting-fit shape so my 40s become easier.
johnmurray  
#6 Posted : 25 August 2011 10:48:39(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
johnmurray

Unfortunately, many members of the "workforce" will not be able to benefit.
Those with damaged lungs due to working in high-fume-high-dust workplaces for instance.........and I'm sure that very many other sufferers from industrial ill-health will not be able to benefit.
Andrew Bober  
#7 Posted : 25 August 2011 10:57:10(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Andrew Bober

Good point from John.

I think the benefit from any programme is that is has to be tailored for specific groups. Those with health conditions should, as consquence of their health condition, recieve a program of rehabiliation etc. for them.

Health programmes shouldn't be seen in the form of hard-core fitness.

Andrew Böber CMIOSH FRSPH FRGS
Invictus  
#8 Posted : 25 August 2011 11:56:06(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Invictus

Were I work the provision for fitness is in the main purpose built sports centre, built for lets say customers, but it is also a requirement that this is also available to employees. We have trained employees who's role it is to run the gym. As they are trained by the company there is an expectation that they will provide diet and exercise advice to employees. This is also backed up by stop smoking groups to assist smokers to quit with support from the cancer trust etc. The company also organisers for yoga sessions and the main sports hall has split days, football Monday, Tuesday and Thursday Lunch and evenings and tennis, badminton, keep fit on the other days (director plays football).
Also on offer individual exercise programmes.
We also have companies coming in offering alternative therapies.
Andrew Bober  
#9 Posted : 25 August 2011 13:52:39(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Andrew Bober

Farrell I like the sound of that provision.
Borisgiles  
#10 Posted : 25 August 2011 16:02:53(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Borisgiles

How about encouraging employees to cycle to work by providing showers, lockers, secure bike parking, a tool and spares "library" and implementing the cycle to work scheme (tax free bikes).

We have a correlation linking those who cycle or walk to work with fewer manual handling injuries as they are warmed up before they start work and are possibly more alert as well.

Employees also benefit financially through lower fuel bills and other car running costs.
Graham Bullough  
#11 Posted : 25 August 2011 17:35:55(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Graham Bullough

The significant increases in vehicle fuel prices in the UK might have a positive aspect in influencing more people to take up cycling between home and work if it's feasible. Also, it seems that the number of leisure cyclists in my part of the UK is definitely on the increase, especially at weekends. Hopefully it's a small indicator that attitudes about cycling are gradually changing in the UK. The sad thing is that some motorists demonstrate a selfish attitude to cyclists by overtaking with virtually no room to spare. They also have no regard for other road users if they overtake cyclists at inappropriate locations on narrow bendy roads instead of slowing down behind the cyclists for a few seconds or so until it's appropriate and safe to overtake.

On another theme, many organisations which have multi-storey workplaces can encourage employees to use the stairs instead of the lifts if they don't already do so. Try posters with slogans like "Use the stairs and give your health a lift!" Points in favour of using the stairs include the fact that it is free and simple and no equipment is needed. Also, though each stint of exercise is of short duration, the experts seem to agree that it is nevertheless beneficial, especially for employees in sedentary occupations.
walker  
#12 Posted : 26 August 2011 11:45:47(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
walker

At my work place we get enough excercise by:

Jumping to conclusions.
Flying off the handle.
Carrying things too far.
Dodging responsibilities
Pushing their luck
Running down the boss
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.