Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error
Cutoff between working and non-working Supervisors
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Previous Topic Next Topic
AdrianW  
#1 Posted : 08 September 2011 13:17:59(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
AdrianW
This is not a strictly an H&S question but I'm hoping someone may be able to help me out here. I have been onto the HSE website and done a google search but I couldn't find anything on it. Is there a cutoff in the number of employees to supervisors? eg: If you have 6 or less employees then you can have a working supervisor, but if you have more than 6 employees then you would require a full time supervisor. Thanking you
Back to top
MB1  
#2 Posted : 08 September 2011 13:22:04(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
MB1
I hope not... or our ratio will need to be dramatically changed! What about the difference between direct supervision (e.g. young persons) and general supervision?
Back to top
AdrianW  
#3 Posted : 08 September 2011 13:26:37(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
AdrianW
Just to clarify - I mean on-site supervision
Back to top
MB1  
#4 Posted : 08 September 2011 14:01:36(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
MB1
http://www.hse.gov.uk/co...on/engagement/heyrod.pdf Case study for supervisor/worker ration was reduced from 1:9.3 to 1:8.7 I doubt there is a general rule but could be part of RA or contractual expectation with the client?
Back to top
AdrianW  
#5 Posted : 08 September 2011 14:05:21(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
AdrianW
Thanks for the link, MB 1.
Back to top
Canopener  
#6 Posted : 08 September 2011 15:20:59(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Canopener
Is there a cutoff in the number of employees to supervisors? No, generally I don't think that there are, and I suggest that the 'ratio' would in part be determined by a number of factors, including the level of risk, competence, experience, remoteness of the site etc etc. IF, my memory hasn't failed me there is a little something in HSG65 and I wonder if there is something in the guidance to the 'Management' Regs
Back to top
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF.NET | YAF.NET © 2003-2025, Yet Another Forum.NET