Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
kimberleya1  
#1 Posted : 06 October 2011 14:11:29(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
kimberleya1

Hi all, Wondering if anyone has any advice/experience in risk assessing travel by country and how the different risk ratings would be calculated for topics such as health, climate, security, crime etc. I know that there is travel advice on the foreign office website which will say whether they recommend travel to the country, how not to get mugged etc , but I would like to develop something in-house which can assess where we are sending employees, and will therefore govern the internal processes and procedures that need to be applied to make sure they have all info and are kept safe throughout their trip. Therefore I am looking for suggestions for criteria and how to categorise the risk ratings. Any suggestions will be gratefully received, Thanks
Bob Shillabeer  
#2 Posted : 06 October 2011 15:25:58(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Bob Shillabeer

Worked for a company where employees went to the continent on business quite often. They carried such things as laptop computers and of course cash. I did not undertake risk assessments simply because the risk was unmeasurable. That is not to say the risk did not exist, we had one case of a staff member being mugged and his laptop stolen while he was walking from the station to his hotel, but how do you measure the level of risk and what sort of measures could you put in place? I simply decided that there is a risk of such incidents and to reduce this risk they were told to use a taxi from the station to the hotel and vice versa, this reduced the risk to almost zero of being mugged again. I use this example just to illustrate that there are some risks that need no analysis as they are niot measurable but need protecting against. Just put in place some simple measures and the risk will disappear (well almost anyway).
Rees21880  
#3 Posted : 07 October 2011 08:01:44(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Rees21880

Hi Kimberley I can sort of understand where Bob S is coming from, but do disagree - the risk can always be 'rated' even if its just a simple "high/medium/low". We have people routinely travelling to Nigeria which is always a high risk for personal safety, whereas travelling to France is comparitively "low". To counter this, we are developing InCountry Guides that are specific to the relevant country and provide generic information and advice for the traveller. We are also providing an appropriate level of risk assessment training so that they are able to carry out on-site risk assessments. Lastly, check with your insurer as they will obviously have an interest in this, but also lots of experience that I'm sure they'll happily pass on. Pete
Rees21880  
#4 Posted : 07 October 2011 08:04:19(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Rees21880

Hi Kimberley I can sort of understand where Bob S is coming from, but do disagree - the risk can always be 'rated' even if its just a simple "high/medium/low". We have people routinely travelling to Nigeria which is always a high risk for personal safety, whereas travelling to France is comparitively "low". To counter this, we are developing InCountry Guides that are specific to the relevant country and provide generic information and advice for the traveller. We are also providing an appropriate level of risk assessment training so that they are able to carry out on-site risk assessments. Lastly, check with your insurer as they will obviously have an interest in this, but also lots of experience that I'm sure they'll happily pass on. Pete
Rees21880  
#5 Posted : 07 October 2011 08:05:57(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Rees21880

Sorry...what I should have said in my previous reply is that Bob is referring to difficulty in pre-mitigation rating, whereas its easier to rate post-mitigation ie after all relevant control measures have been implemented. Pete
Doobrifurkin  
#6 Posted : 07 October 2011 08:23:32(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Doobrifurkin

Check the FCO website and select the country being visited will give you a level of risk when travelling to that country and a list of precautions and advice to take....hence gathering information on your risk assessment. Website is - http://www.fco.gov.uk/en...ravel-advice-by-country/
MB1  
#7 Posted : 07 October 2011 09:44:11(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
MB1

The FCO doesn't mention the flurry of attention you may receive upon getting through customs & immigration at some airports, especially in some African countries. Bear in mind even 'approved' taxi's can have their own personal security problems. In some cases from past experience use of a pre defined agent to meet, assist you out of the airport to your hotel, arrange transport etc has always been the better way to travel through many countries. In fact a godsend in some airports getting through each side smoothly!
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.