Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
markdm  
#1 Posted : 06 October 2011 11:01:37(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
markdm

Hi all I am having difficulty in getting accross to employees at my place of work the need to keep fire doors closed. The building is on 2 floors (i'm upstairs) the main downstairs office is open planned and is home to 2 departments. Although 2 senior managers are based within the downstairs office; the main exit fire door is almost always wedged open with a wooden excavation wedge. Other than the obvious; the fire door also acts as security measure as one requires a key fob to access from the exterior; I have; on many occasions walked into the office to find it completely deserted! So; if a fire were to start it would not be contained as well as the risk of intrusion; theft; vandalism etc. I have sent polite email notification of this problem to all staff in the past. Also; the office has air conditioning installed. Has anyone any ideas on how I can get the message accross of the importance of leaving fire doors closed in a way that will ensure eveyone takes note but at the same time politely so that I don't rub people up the wrong way (senior managers) Any response will be welcome however obvious it may seem. Many thanks
Safety Smurf  
#2 Posted : 06 October 2011 11:11:28(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Safety Smurf

Hi Markdm, There is no requirement to keep fire exits closed unless they are within a prescribed distance of a an external escape stairway (at least not from a fire safety perspective). You seem to have fallen into the common trap of confusing fire doors (doors within the building, kept closed to prevent the spread of smoke and flame from one building compartment to the next) with fire exits (an exit from the building to be used in the event of a fire leading directly to the outside and fresh air).
markdm  
#3 Posted : 06 October 2011 11:24:03(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
markdm

Safety Smurf wrote:
Hi Markdm, There is no requirement to keep fire exits closed unless they are within a prescribed distance of a an external escape stairway (at least not from a fire safety perspective). You seem to have fallen into the common trap of confusing fire doors (doors within the building, kept closed to prevent the spread of smoke and flame from one building compartment to the next) with fire exits (an exit from the building to be used in the event of a fire leading directly to the outside and fresh air).
Sorry; i should have stated that the door in question; although the main exit out of the office; actually opens into a small corridor with a shower/changing room to the left and then through another door leading directly outside.
Graham Bullough  
#4 Posted : 06 October 2011 12:00:15(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Graham Bullough

markdm - as a quick off-the-cuff suggestion, why not have a word with a more senior manager (if there is one) and also any security manager to highlight the security and the fire safety/property protection shortcomings. Also, rather than have the more senior manager send another e-mail/note to the staff involved, why not plan with him/her to leave a small box or other item on everyone's desks clearly marked something like "This could be but isn't a bomb! Keep the (name of) door closed to maintain security, protect company property and also your personal possessions". Crucially the wording should end with the more senior manager's signature, name and title. Being different, radical and unexpected, the mock bombs are likely to provoke some discussion among the staff involved and hopefully a change of attitude which results in the door being kept shut. Also, if the 2 senior managers in the building know that a more senior manager is involved and keeping an eye on developments, they might be more inclined to encourage other staff to keep the door shut and secure to unauthorised people.
SBH  
#5 Posted : 06 October 2011 12:11:15(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
SBH

If it is indeed a fire door tell all in the office that someone is breaking the law (RRFSO 2005). Give them the legal aspect above Then the economic aspect a fire will cause loss of income. Then the moral aspect What if one of the potential incident caused deaths of colleagues or family? If all else fails try the responsible person and involve them in the actions required. SBH
tabs  
#6 Posted : 06 October 2011 12:18:08(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
tabs

Alarm the door? - a really annoying pitch. Put the door on magnets connected to your fire systems? Use "Dorguard" (other systems might be available)? Take the wedge away every day? etc.,
Graham Bullough  
#7 Posted : 06 October 2011 12:53:55(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Graham Bullough

SBH - Quoting the law as you suggest is unlikely to have much effect. The same goes for your other suggestions. The employees will very probably continue to think that the likelihood of a fire and adverse consequences (impact on organisation, threat to jobs, deaths of individuals, etc) are remote, hence their ongoing sloppiness regarding the door. Having a screech alarm as suggested by tabs would be much more effective. markdm - Is the door fitted with a self-closing device? If not, why not have one fitted - not least to make the door effective as a security feature. Also, if people are repeatedly wedging the door open, why are they doing so? Could there be a persistent fault with the air conditioning system for example? Also, from what you describe, is the door actually needed? (Some of us, myself included, should have been more logical and asked this question earlier!) Seek a site discussion with a fire expert. It may well be feasible to remove the door involved if a self-closer can be fitted (if necessary) to the shower/changing room door. As regards the security fob system, this could be moved to the final exit door and reinforced by the fitting of a self-closer if it doesn't already have one. Also, in due course, please could you share with the rest of us on the forum how the problem is eventually tackled? It would be useful to others dealing with similar situations.
achrn  
#8 Posted : 06 October 2011 14:35:56(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
achrn

Graham Bullough wrote:
SBH - Quoting the law as you suggest is unlikely to have much effect. The same goes for your other suggestions. The employees will very probably continue to think that the likelihood of a fire and adverse consequences (impact on organisation, threat to jobs, deaths of individuals, etc) are remote, hence their ongoing sloppiness regarding the door. Having a screech alarm as suggested by tabs would be much more effective.
Yes, but I actually had success recently pointing out to an office that you can suffer bad consequences from propped open fire doors even if you don't have a fire. We have not had a history of fire door abuse, but suddenly I found doors wedged open three times in the space of a week. I circulated a reminder, and linked it to the Tesco recent £119,000 fine for fire safety breaches which stemmed from a fire officer noticing breaches even though there was no injury or loss-of-life. So far, I have not found another one propped open. I suspect whoever it was thinks fires are vanishingly rare, but rates jobsworth inspectors to be more likley.
markdm  
#9 Posted : 06 October 2011 15:30:32(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
markdm

Graham Bullough wrote:
SBH - Quoting the law as you suggest is unlikely to have much effect. The same goes for your other suggestions. The employees will very probably continue to think that the likelihood of a fire and adverse consequences (impact on organisation, threat to jobs, deaths of individuals, etc) are remote, hence their ongoing sloppiness regarding the door. Having a screech alarm as suggested by tabs would be much more effective. markdm - Is the door fitted with a self-closing device? If not, why not have one fitted - not least to make the door effective as a security feature. Also, if people are repeatedly wedging the door open, why are they doing so? Could there be a persistent fault with the air conditioning system for example? Also, from what you describe, is the door actually needed? (Some of us, myself included, should have been more logical and asked this question earlier!) Seek a site discussion with a fire expert. It may well be feasible to remove the door involved if a self-closer can be fitted (if necessary) to the shower/changing room door. As regards the security fob system, this could be moved to the final exit door and reinforced by the fitting of a self-closer if it doesn't already have one. Also, in due course, please could you share with the rest of us on the forum how the problem is eventually tackled? It would be useful to others dealing with similar situations.
The outer door is accessable to all employees wishing to use the shower/locker rooms; the fire door (self closing)is supposed to be kept shut to stop others from waltzing in. I certainly will let all in the groups know how i get on. Thanks
firesafety101  
#10 Posted : 06 October 2011 18:02:21(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

tabs wrote:
Alarm the door? - a really annoying pitch. Put the door on magnets connected to your fire systems? Use "Dorguard" (other systems might be available)? Take the wedge away every day? etc.,
I agree with tabs - he beat me to it.
Graham Bullough  
#11 Posted : 06 October 2011 19:32:36(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Graham Bullough

achrn - Fair point, backed up by your example of successful intervention regarding fire doors. My comment about the success or otherwise of quoting the law stems from my stance that quoting the law at people, especially in depth during training sessions, tends to be counter-productive to the cause of OS&H. However, that's just my opinion based on experience. It's up to forum users to read postings and responses and choose what advice they think might be appropriate and could work for them. markdm - From what you write about the inner door, it sounds more like a security door than a fire door. However, it's not much use as a security door if the building's occupants keep wedging it open for some reason. Perhaps a few of them keep forgetting their fob devices when they go out of the door. Anyhow, good luck with trying to resolve the matter.
Invictus  
#12 Posted : 07 October 2011 07:11:48(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Invictus

Did I really read: 'why not plan with him/her to leave a small box or other item on everyone's desks clearly marked something like "This could be but isn't a bomb! Keep the (name of) door closed to maintain security, protect company property and also your personal possessions". Crucially the wording should end with the more senior manager's signature, name and title'. Why not discuss with the staff why the door is being wedged open and look at ways to alleviate the issues surrounding this. There are a lot of good suggestions like ' using an alarm, this could also have a delay so only goes off if the door is left open for a certain length of time, put on door magnets, use Dorguard or other systems, but to pretend to put a bomb on someones desk, is that really the best we can do.
Graham Bullough  
#13 Posted : 07 October 2011 18:24:59(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Graham Bullough

Farrell - Only you can answer your opening question at #12 ! However, it seems from your reference to "a bomb on someone's desk" (i.e. one item on one desk) that you've misread or misunderstood my response at #4 which suggested similar items on everyone's desks with the intention of provoking discussion and hopefully action by the building's occupants. Try reading the whole response again and put the bit you've quoted in its proper context. As for your concluding question, the very obvious answer to it is no. Most forum users probably deduced this from my opening comment that it was "a quick off-the-cuff suggestion". The topic raised a good varied mix of responses, including my query about whether the issue is really about fire or security, plus an offer by markdm to share with this forum how the matter is resolved in due course. Have a nice weekend.
Rolfuswithus  
#14 Posted : 09 October 2011 10:21:36(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
Rolfuswithus

I can definately recommend the use of 'Dorguard'. We had this problem in several areas where wooden wedges were being used. Even management were happy with this practice although they knew should not go on, and even removed the wedges prior to a Fire inspection, only to put them back afterwards! In our case it was a combination of laziness and their belief that the likelyhood of a fire was remote. At a cost of around £100 a piece and taking about 30mins to fit, we installed several in problem areas. As they operate on sound levels, they only work if you have an operating alarms system and its loud enough to activate the release mechanism on the individual doors. Now these doors remain permanently held open, and even automatically release at the end of the working day. When the batteries run low, they are set to release and will not stay open. All in all, a good product.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.