Rank: Forum user
|
Hi, I have been advised that we are to supply substances for example
pH NEUTRAL
CONTAINS NO ACIDS OR LYES
CONTAINS NO NMP (N-METHYL-PYRROLIDON)
CONTAINS NO PARAFFIN OR PRESERVATIVE AGENTS
Do I still need safety data sheets for this, and if so in what format? I can't help but think that there may be something hazardous in there, otherwise the product would nit do it's job??
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
What do you mean by 'supply' - are you selling these cubstances on, and if so, to whom (members of the public?, workplaces?)?
It isn't very helpful having a list of what is not in it. I would want to know what IS in it.
What is its job?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Hi Jane, sorry they are alledged eco friendly products such as graffitii remover, graffitti cleaner which are water based.
Yes they are products that we propose to sell.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Also, we do have technical data sheets but they are not safety data sheets as I see it
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
They may be water-based, but if they can function effectively as graffiti remover, etc., then I cannot imagine a formulation that will not contain some substances that will be capable of causing adverse effects on the skin.
In any event, the safety data sheet is just one aspect of the information you need to provide. Take a look at section 6-1 of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974. You will see that you have a duty to provide information such that the product can be used safely for the purpose for which it has been supplied. This is quite a different requirement to that for the safety data sheet (which is for CHIP, not COSHH).
This is a problem I commonly encounter. A substance is stated on the safety data sheet that it is non-hazardous, whereas the performance of the product indicates otherwise. Eventually, if I succeed in obtaining information on the constituent it becomes clear that, whilst the safety data sheet might well conform with CHIP, the information therein is useless for COSHH and certainly does not ensure that the supplier has conformed with his duties under the Act.
Just as a final point, there are at least 8 substances considered as common sensitisers by the dermatological community (who will stock these in their clinic for patch testing) but which have never been classified as R43 and will therefore seldom feature on the safety data sheet as sensitisers (if they appear at all!). When a worker then develops an occupational contact dermatitis, who has failed in their duty? (Rhetorical question as I am not aware of a court judgement on this yet.)
Chris
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: New forum user
|
Birchall31628 It would be advisable to verify the product(s) you intend to supply do not contain a substance or substances of very high concern (SVHC) listed under REACH. The easiest way to identify this is to check the ‘official candidates list’ on the European Chemicals Agency (EChA) website:
http://echa.europa.eu/ch...didate_list_table_en.asp
REACH applies to all substances (unless covered by other legislation) or mixtures so if your products do contain SVHC’s then you will have an obligation under REACH to communicate to your customer(s) (downstream user) and provide the necessary information (SDS) to enable them to manage the risks they are exposed to.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.