Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Paul Macciocchi  
#1 Posted : 25 October 2011 10:01:12(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
Paul Macciocchi

Is anyone aware of an impending ban on cotton dust sheets?!!! I've had a look around the net but can't find anything definitive. Cheers Paul
A Kurdziel  
#2 Posted : 25 October 2011 10:05:05(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
A Kurdziel

This sounds like another safety myth. Things like this are hardly ever banned (I believe that there are still a small number of legitimate uses for asbestos), we rely on risk assessment to decide what is appropriate for our work. Why would anybody want to ban cotton dust sheets?
firesafety101  
#3 Posted : 25 October 2011 12:10:53(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

I recently attended a construction site where the shop front was being fitted. The contractor was "Hot working" and decided to sheet up the front glazing for protection against sparks. Guess what the used - yes a cotton dust sheet? The fire was quickly extinguished but the red faces were not caused bu heat from the fire :-( One place where they should be banned.
A Kurdziel  
#4 Posted : 25 October 2011 13:45:01(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
A Kurdziel

ChrisBurns Somebody obviously had not done their risk assessment.
Clairel  
#5 Posted : 25 October 2011 13:50:15(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Clairel

Chris you don't ban them you just don't use them in that instance. The word 'ban' should be eliminated from use in H&S as it seems to create all sorts of myths. As to the original post, I think someone is winding you up. Why ban cotton dust sheets? For some jobs they are perfectly acceptable.
PVZ  
#6 Posted : 25 October 2011 14:44:22(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
PVZ

You can use them to cover up all those banned ladders!
barnaby  
#7 Posted : 25 October 2011 14:58:19(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Guest

Clairel wrote:
The word 'ban' should be eliminated from use in H&S as it seems to create all sorts of myths.
Quite, in some sectors eg education you can spend an inordinate amount of time disabusing those who should know better.
firesafety101  
#8 Posted : 25 October 2011 15:20:15(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

Clairel wrote:
Chris you don't ban them you just don't use them in that instance. The word 'ban' should be eliminated from use in H&S as it seems to create all sorts of myths. As to the original post, I think someone is winding you up. Why ban cotton dust sheets? For some jobs they are perfectly acceptable.
There you go again Claire being picky ..................................................................
messyshaw  
#9 Posted : 25 October 2011 22:32:05(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
messyshaw

Clairel wrote:
Chris you don't ban them you just don't use them in that instance. The word 'ban' should be eliminated from use in H&S as it seems to create all sorts of myths. As to the original post, I think someone is winding you up. Why ban cotton dust sheets? For some jobs they are perfectly acceptable.
Are you are saying that you want to ban the word ban? :-)
John D C  
#10 Posted : 26 October 2011 11:31:30(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
John D C

Cotton which has had linseed oil spilt on to it can spontaneously ignite some hours later. As these dust sheets are mainly used by painters and decorators who will also be using stains etc, often made up with linseed oil, there is a danger of ignition. This ignition normally only occurs when the sheets are folded up -left hanging they do not heat up. I therefore think that this is one of the occasions when someone not understanding what is going on makes a decision to ban something rather than manage the situation. The reaction between linseed oil and cotton is not that well known - I have investigated two fires caused by this and on both occasions the people involved and the fire officers involved were not aware of the potential problem. Take care John C
Graham Bullough  
#11 Posted : 26 October 2011 18:22:40(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Graham Bullough

Perhaps a rumour about a ban was started by people who make or sell non-cotton dust sheets in a bid to discredit the cotton ones or at least get more customers. As for banning the word "ban", surely there's no need - because we don't ban things in OS&H ! By contrast, media people delight in writing or broadcasting about bans, especially after non-OS&H people have misused/misappropriated 'health & safety' in order to justify unpopular decisions, actions or inactions. John C - Useful advice about cotton and linseed oil. It reminds me of a TV programme I think I saw some years ago regarding a major fire in a prestigious building somewhere in America. The fire investigators were baffled about the cause of the fire until someone mentioned that the building was undergoing redecoration and therefore suggested that spontaneous ignition of resin or linseed-soaked (cotton?) rags was involved. As the experienced fire investigators were still sceptical, I vaguely recall that the person also had to recreate the effect in a test chamber before their scepticism could be dispelled. After that it became standard practice for such rags to be kept in closed metal containers prior to disposal. As my memory might be defective, do any other forum users recall such a programme? Also, does the risk of spontaneous combustion disappear after newish linseed oil residues on/in cotton have dried out?
Zyggy  
#12 Posted : 27 October 2011 11:18:58(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Zyggy

Like JOHNC, I was once involved with a similar situation in a garage where the mechanics opened up in the morning to find a plastic bin burnt out & arson was suspected. Our Fire Officer arrived & soon discovered that rags contaminated with thinners were thrown into the bin after use & the cause of the fire was spontaneous combustion. The solution was to replace the bin with a metal one fitted with a lid & regularly empty it to prevent a build up.
A Kurdziel  
#13 Posted : 28 October 2011 09:51:16(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
A Kurdziel

So we have moved from a discussion about a simple minded ‘ban’ on cotton dust sheets to information about the possibility that oil contaminated cotton cloth (sheets or rags) could pose a fire risk. This is why this forum is useful; it unearths information that can help in creating your risk assessment, which it what drives proper H&S.
teh_boy  
#14 Posted : 28 October 2011 10:37:35(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
teh_boy

JOHNC wrote:
Cotton which has had linseed oil spilt on to it can spontaneously ignite some hours later. As these dust sheets are mainly used by painters and decorators who will also be using stains etc, often made up with linseed oil, there is a danger of ignition. This ignition normally only occurs when the sheets are folded up -left hanging they do not heat up. I therefore think that this is one of the occasions when someone not understanding what is going on makes a decision to ban something rather than manage the situation. The reaction between linseed oil and cotton is not that well known - I have investigated two fires caused by this and on both occasions the people involved and the fire officers involved were not aware of the potential problem. Take care John C
Correct me if I am wrong, I thought the problem that was linseed oil cures by oxidation, not evaporation of a solvent, Oxidation is exothermic (generates heat) and hence the fire risk. Applying my somewhat rusty Chemistry skills - ANY combustible material is at risk. Not just cotton? (e.g. news paper) Not sure what the reaction between cotton would be?
leadbelly  
#15 Posted : 28 October 2011 11:23:52(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
leadbelly

Yes, the issue is heat generated by the oxidation of drying oils (of which linseed oil is one); if the material is screwed up or otherwise confined, the heat can build up until the auto-ignition temperature is reached. LB
John J  
#16 Posted : 28 October 2011 11:30:48(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
John J

I don't know about any ban but the price of cotton has rocketed recently so stockists may be supplying alternatives to keep their margins up.
chris.packham  
#17 Posted : 28 October 2011 11:45:31(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
chris.packham

Oxidisation --- I have sitting on my laptop an e-mail from the southern hemisphere describing the use of a product based on d-limonene, the oil extracted from the peel of citrus fruits. They were using large quantities of this with rags to clean electrical equipment. As a 'natural' product they saw no reason why the used rags should not be dumped in a skip, until they had three fires. Cause was oxidisation of the d-limonene. Incidentally, d-limonene is classified as an irritant, but not a sensitiser. However, once oxidised it will contain potent (photo-)sensitisers capable of causing occupational contact dermatitis and, if there is exposure to strong sunlight, predispose to skin cancer. Chris
A Kurdziel  
#18 Posted : 28 October 2011 11:55:55(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
A Kurdziel

See http://www.esfrs.org/bla...eum/linseedOilRags.shtml for an example of what can happen. Still no need to ban cotton sheets just a need to manage them.
A Kurdziel  
#19 Posted : 28 October 2011 12:01:01(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
A Kurdziel

And another thought perhaps the media should be publicising things like this; you know public safety information rather than looking to slag off ‘elf and safety’. Sorry my mistake- the media are not there to inform the public but create fake issues for them to rant about
teh_boy  
#20 Posted : 28 October 2011 12:05:00(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
teh_boy

Chris.Packham wrote:
Oxidisation --- Chris
That's my fricin speel checker!!! I really should read what is being corrected :) *Hangs head in shame
stillp  
#21 Posted : 28 October 2011 13:45:36(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
stillp

Chris.Packham wrote:
Oxidisation --- I have sitting on my laptop an e-mail from the southern hemisphere describing the use of a product based on d-limonene, the oil extracted from the peel of citrus fruits. They were using large quantities of this with rags to clean electrical equipment. As a 'natural' product they saw no reason why the used rags should not be dumped in a skip, until they had three fires. Cause was oxidisation of the d-limonene. Incidentally, d-limonene is classified as an irritant, but not a sensitiser. However, once oxidised it will contain potent (photo-)sensitisers capable of causing occupational contact dermatitis and, if there is exposure to strong sunlight, predispose to skin cancer. Chris
Chris, that's very useful information, as most people (myself included) assume that because these cleaners are "natural", they can't be harmful.
Jane Blunt  
#22 Posted : 28 October 2011 14:45:43(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Jane Blunt

stillp wrote:
Chris, that's very useful information, as most people (myself included) assume that because these cleaners are "natural", they can't be harmful.
I suspect the power of advertising is responsible for this misconception, where 'natural' has become synonymous with 'really good for you'. Never forget that deadly nightshade, hemlock and the bite of a rattlesnake are all natural, to take but three examples.
John D C  
#23 Posted : 30 October 2011 14:27:15(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
John D C

teh boy wrote Correct me if I am wrong, I thought the problem that was linseed oil cures by oxidation, not evaporation of a solvent, Oxidation is exothermic (generates heat) and hence the fire risk. Applying my somewhat rusty Chemistry skills - ANY combustible material is at risk. Not just cotton? (e.g. news paper) You are quite right about the process and it is not just cotton - any organic material will do the same. Take care John C
Route66  
#24 Posted : 31 October 2011 15:26:24(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Route66

Cotton is a bit of an odd material when it comes to burning. I can remember many, many years ago, reading a report about how cotton bales retain enough oxygen to allow that same bale to burn completely. The article I read was about fires in the cargo holds of ships before containerisation. Seemingly, if there was a fire in a hold, the usual process was to stave it of oxygen by sealing all hatches. The exception to the rule was a hold full of cotton bales, the fire would consume the entire cargo, over several days, before extinguishing. Such fires had to be fought, not just staved. Here endeth the history lesson for today.
chris.packham  
#25 Posted : 31 October 2011 15:33:08(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
chris.packham

Route66 Many years ago when working in Libya in the oil industry we had a worker who fell asleep in his accomodation whilst smoking. Have you ever tried to put out a burning cotton mattress? You soak it is water until it is drenched and there is no smoke at all. Half an hour later the blessed thing bursts into flame again! Chris
Graham Bullough  
#26 Posted : 01 November 2011 13:07:41(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Graham Bullough

The web article at http://www.info4fire.com...s-lead-to-safety-warning may be of interest and use. In summary a fire & rescue service warned earlier this year that towels which have absorbed essential oils used in beauty therapy could catch fire. This warning followed a number of fires at places like launderettes, salons and also a college beauty therapy room which was badly damaged. It seems that the fires have occurred in tumble dryers, linen baskets and airing cupboards where towels with oil on them have self-combusted. The risk can be overcome by washing such towels in machines set at 40°C or above so that the heat and washing detergents can effectively break down and remove the oil residues. Although most towels tend to be made of cotton or contain a significant proportion of cotton, the article also mentions linen. Even though it's more likely that the writer used the word linen as a general one for fabrics (like bed linen) than as a reference to fabrics derived from flax, can anyone advise if the spontaneous fire risk associated with linseed oil residues (and of other types of oil judging from the article) is particular to cotton or can also occur in non-cotton fabrics such as wool and linen?
leadbelly  
#27 Posted : 01 November 2011 13:16:57(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
leadbelly

Graham According to a well-known online encyclopedia, the auto-ignition temperature for cotton is 407ºC and that for linen is 254 - 400ºC (although I did not see an explanation for the range) so linen could be more of a problem. LB
Graham Bullough  
#28 Posted : 01 November 2011 14:52:51(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Graham Bullough

Leadbelly - Thanks for the info about the auto-ignition temperatures. Also, though some of us forum users may ponder about your pseudonym, it's probably discourteous to ask how or why you chose it. In connection with this topic I looked up 'guncotton' on the internet to see what was available. A fair bit of information appears about it, an explosive, under 'Nitrocellulose' in a certain online encyclopedia. Although cotton wool is normally used, it seems that any combustible material such as starch or wood fibres can be used as the base medium. After guncotton the webpage deals with nitrate film, alias nitrocellulose film, which was used for x-ray films and movie films until well into the 20th century. The information is fascinating, and concentrates on the very highly flammable nature of such film. It was involved in a number of serious fires in cinemas (e.g. at Paisley in 1929 where 69 children died) and required stringent precautions including the use of special projectors capable of containing fires, plus the lining of projection rooms with asbestos! Thankfully, nitrate film was eventually replaced from 1948 by cellulose triacetate film which was far less flammable. A useful example of good risk management by replacing a hazardous substance with a less hazardous one.
ptaylor14  
#29 Posted : 01 November 2011 15:09:23(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
ptaylor14

Clairel wrote:
Chris you don't ban them you just don't use them in that instance. The word 'ban' should be eliminated from use in H&S as it seems to create all sorts of myths. As to the original post, I think someone is winding you up. Why ban cotton dust sheets? For some jobs they are perfectly acceptable.
Thanks Clairel, I was just about to point out the same!!!
ptaylor14  
#30 Posted : 01 November 2011 15:11:16(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
ptaylor14

ChrisBurns wrote:
Clairel wrote:
Chris you don't ban them you just don't use them in that instance. The word 'ban' should be eliminated from use in H&S as it seems to create all sorts of myths. As to the original post, I think someone is winding you up. Why ban cotton dust sheets? For some jobs they are perfectly acceptable.
There you go again Claire being picky ..................................................................
She`s right you, as usual have got it wrong
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.