Rank: Super forum user
|
Tony, I’m sure this will sound patronising: I guess you are relatively new to H&S otherwise you would be aware that a 2M rule was debated to the nth degree when the WaH regs were first drafted.
I for one, don’t want to go there again.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
TonyMurphy wrote:Nonsense.
I can give you a list of consultants who are clueless, in fact I met one last night who actually said that all you need to start up is " Google".
He has a great client base too and he is a half decent lad but he genuinely hasnt got a clue. He asked me what the six pack regs were because he thought his client was winding him up.
Tony, not everyone who wasn't around in the 90s will necessarily know the term "6 pack". Frankly I wouldn't care if he knows what the term was, does he know his stuff on H&S? Does he do good work for his clients?
I can give you a list of people in absolutely any profession who are considered clueless by others in that profession. Some of them would appear on each other's "clueless lists". It's subjective and meaningless as you imply by highlighting the different experiences you have had with your own clients.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I was around then.
I've always avoided using the term as its an irrelevance.
Six different regulations came out at the same time - so what?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
My Wife knows what a six pack is, though she hasn't seen one for years - not on me anyway!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Low professional fees imply low quality to buyers who value high quality; high fees are sometimes perceived as too expensive and those who want to buy solely on cost may be ultimately disappointed. The nature of the free market in which h&s consultants operate allows each consultant(cy) to set its own levels abnd buyers to choose according to their own buying criteria.
On the issue of how to identify a "good" consultant, as always a personal recommendation is best, but recognising that the fit between the buying organisation and consultant may not be perfect in each case.
The same question can be posed in each profession eg plumbing, law, accountancy, decorating, medicine, architecture, window fitting etc.
I have a personal and intense dislike of those firms who require their clients to enter in to long-term contracts and then too often fail to deliver anything other than piles of paper. Good business for them but useless for the mug punter.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I'm all for challenging the norm and a lively debate...but I don't like it when someone infers I'm talking 'nonsense' simply because I have a different opinion than them. I am happy to let other forum users decide who is talking nonsense.
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.