Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
blodwyn  
#1 Posted : 08 December 2011 14:16:15(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
blodwyn

firesafety101  
#2 Posted : 08 December 2011 15:07:36(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

Can't see why they're bothering to demolish as it's sinking anyway. If they wait long enough it will disappear
martin1  
#3 Posted : 08 December 2011 15:15:03(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
martin1

Looks like one of those mini computer games.

You are a digger driver demolishing a high rise building. You have to dig to ground level, without falling off or collapsing the tower, before your opponent. You extra win points if you can knock your opponent off.

JimMaccall  
#4 Posted : 08 December 2011 15:25:17(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
JimMaccall

2 x 13 tonners! - fabulous.
Went to a job in Leicester years ago, House of Fraser demolition and they had craned a mini digger with breaker up to break out each floor, not for the faint-hearted!
Graham Bullough  
#5 Posted : 08 December 2011 15:55:03(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Graham Bullough

Silly old Daily Wail - the heading for the article asks "How did they get up there?" then the opening line of the article says the excavators were hauled to the top by cranes! Presumably the cranes were of the mechanical variety rather than the ornithological variety! Perhaps I'm being picky in suggesting that cranes hoist or lift rather than haul. Hauling in this context suggests a mental image of a massed cohort of tug-of-war teams pulling the excavators up by means of ropes slung over the tops of the buildings. Also, if the rubble/pieces created during the work get pushed over the sides of the buildings from time to time, hopefully the people on the ground nearby are all wearing their hard hats!

On a more serious note, I wonder why demolition of the buildings by an expert company using controlled explosives wasn't used as a safer and much quicker method. However, perhaps I'm misled in this thinking by having seen TV documentaries of (successful) demolitions of large complex buildings in this manner.

p.s. I've noticed that the blurb under my name at the side of my responses has changed recently to categorise me now as a "super forum user". Though this forum isn't bad, surely it doesn't rank as super! If the word super pertains to me, it's a nonsense because it merely reflects the fact that I've made more than a certain number of postings and responses on this forum and is no reflection on the quality or otherwise of my offerings. Therefore, please can I be reverted promptly to "forum user"? One reason for this is that if my boss happens to see this revised designation, he might accuse me of spending too much time on this forum.

messyshaw  
#6 Posted : 08 December 2011 17:54:56(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
messyshaw

A few weeks ago in Venice, I saw a mini digger with a concrete breaker tool being suspended from a tower crane. The digger was positioned hanging next to a building and the jib operated remotely to demolish this wall/building.

It did look a bit Heath Robinson,(frankly it looked dodgy) but I suppose when you only have narrow strips of water around the site, you have to think laterally
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.