Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
MrsBlue  
#1 Posted : 18 January 2012 14:11:45(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Guest

Just received this fast ball from one of my junior schools to complete a risk assessment for a young lad who suffers from epilepsy - to include hazards and risks if he fits during a fire evacuation drill or indeed the real thing. There are so many ponderables that I am getting tied up in knots - e.g. he fits! the teacher escorting the class has to do something but what about the other 29 kids, what about the teachers own safety, what about the child who may have swallowed their tongue and could be dead once outside (the classroom is on the 3rd floor of a 4 story building). At the school concerned there are no safe refuges so I can't consider a "stay put policy" because the other kids have to be escorted out of the building by the class teacher. Have any of our forum users working with schools come across this situation before and if yes, a steer in the right direction would be very much appreciated. I suppose on reflection this situation could happen at any age in any workplace. Rich
A Kurdziel  
#2 Posted : 18 January 2012 14:24:39(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
A Kurdziel

We need to know what sort of epilepsy this is. What triggers it? If they have an occasional fit then there should not be too much to worry about after all what are the chances that they will have a fit at the same time as a fire or fire drill. If they are having regular fits then I would assume that a member of staff was assign to look after them and they would be able to get them out during a drill.
mylesfrancis  
#3 Posted : 18 January 2012 14:27:46(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
mylesfrancis

Just to clarify, are they asking you to do a Personal Emergency Evacuation Plan (PEEP) rather than a risk assessment? If it is a risk assessment they are after, I would suggest the starting point would be to determine how much of an additional "problem" the lad is compared to a "normal" pupil and consider things such as how often the lad suffers from fits in the usual course of the day, i.e. is it a daily occurrence, weekly, monthly?; is the stress of a fire drill likely to increase the risk of a fit?; etc etc If the likelihood of him fitting during a fire drill is remote, could your risk assessment justify not doing anything additional specific for this lad? If, however, his condition does pose a significant risk, then he would need a PEEP and you can think of things like does he have additional support in the classroom from a TA or similar who could be tasked with ensuring his safety in an evacuation?
jfw  
#4 Posted : 18 January 2012 14:40:23(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
jfw

You should find the following documents useful in answering your question. Fire Safety Risk Assessment - Means of Escape for Disabled People (Supplementary Guide), which covers Personal Emergency Evacuation Plans (PEEP). It can be downloaded for free from :- http://www.communities.g...iresafetyassessmentmeans Fire Safety Risk Assessment - Educational Premises, which includes dealing with people with special needs. It can also be downloaded for free from :- http://www.communities.g...ents/fire/pdf/150865.pdf
MrsBlue  
#5 Posted : 18 January 2012 14:48:20(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Guest

Thanks to all of you who have responded so promptly it's much appreciated. Rich
messyshaw  
#6 Posted : 18 January 2012 20:46:59(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
messyshaw

rich777 wrote:
At the school concerned there are no safe refuges so I can't consider a "stay put policy" because the other kids have to be escorted out of the building by the class teacher. Rich
Rich I am not entirely sure what you mean by a 'stay put policy'. I have never heard of such a system in education, other than where a staged fire alarm system (or voice alarm system) is fitted. Do you mean leaving a disabled person in the refuge??
firesafety101  
#7 Posted : 18 January 2012 22:21:20(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

In a real fire situation you would evacuate this boy without worrying about his condition - get him out alive then deal with any fits etc. Regarding a drill is it really worth all the effort and extra work just for a drill? Why not get his Carer to take him out before the drill starts so that he does not suffer all that stress?
firesafety101  
#8 Posted : 18 January 2012 22:30:08(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

I am assuming the boy has a Carer and a personal health care plan? In my area disabled children either have a statement or a care plan. Both have arrangements for a personal Carer depending on the personal needs. A PEEP will have been written with arrangements for fire evacuation. All classes have teaching assistants (TA) - sometimes it is the TA who is also Carer. In this case I would suggest the boy should have a Carer to escort in any such emergency. Still suggest no need to get the boy involved in practice drills as long as the staff know the drill, the boy will not evacuate under his own steam. Is there a lift? What arrangements for descending to the ground? Don't practice with the boy on an Evac chair or similar, you can potentially cause more harm than any benefit gained from a drill.
firesafety101  
#9 Posted : 18 January 2012 22:34:37(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

mylesfrancis wrote:
Just to clarify, are they asking you to do a Personal Emergency Evacuation Plan (PEEP) rather than a risk assessment? If it is a risk assessment they are after, I would suggest the starting point would be to determine how much of an additional "problem" the lad is compared to a "normal" pupil and consider things such as how often the lad suffers from fits in the usual course of the day, i.e. is it a daily occurrence, weekly, monthly?; is the stress of a fire drill likely to increase the risk of a fit?; etc etc If the likelihood of him fitting during a fire drill is remote, could your risk assessment justify not doing anything additional specific for this lad? If, however, his condition does pose a significant risk, then he would need a PEEP and you can think of things like does he have additional support in the classroom from a TA or similar who could be tasked with ensuring his safety in an evacuation?
I know you don't mean to make this boy a "PROBLEM" as opposed to "NORMAL" pupils but please be careful lin your wording. You could come a cropper under the Equality ACt?
stevedm  
#10 Posted : 19 January 2012 09:43:21(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
stevedm

http://www.epilepsy.org.uk/info/children There is lots of useful guidance on how epilepsy presents in children and gives suggetsed first aid measures in the education environment. May be useful to clear it up generally not just in relation to fires.
Sunstone  
#11 Posted : 19 January 2012 10:43:55(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Scotty C

Some assumptions being made about the level of the young fellas abilities! Having epilepsy does not mean that a person would have any other physical or intellectual impairments. As A Kurdziel mentioned, the type of epilepsy needs to be identified as seizures come in many shapes and forms. And trying to move someone who is having a tonic clonic seizure (the type normally associated with having a 'fit', with shaking etc) is extremely difficult, not to mention dangerous for both the person in seizure and the person doing the moving! Hence the need for a robust PEEP detailing his support requirements to guide those involved in any evac. Rich777 - someone having a seizure would not swallow their tongue; it might get seriously bitten, but not swallowed, as when they are in a seizure of this type, their muscles go rigid. The danger of breathing being restricted (the tongue relaxing and blocking the airway, much like someone does when they snore!) comes after the seizure has finished, and the person should be rolled onto their side to prevent this happening. Anyway, some good advice here - Steve's link in particular.
mylesfrancis  
#12 Posted : 19 January 2012 11:37:25(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
mylesfrancis

Firesafety101 wrote:
I know you don't mean to make this boy a "PROBLEM" as opposed to "NORMAL" pupils but please be careful lin your wording. You could come a cropper under the Equality ACt?
I was aware of the sensitivities as I typed it, hence the use of quotation marks but wanted to provide a prompt response to the OP. Don't see how this comes under the Equality Act though when both the original Q and my response are seeking to ensure that the individual's needs are accommodated and he isn't discriminated against....
Briano  
#13 Posted : 19 January 2012 12:04:33(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
Briano

The original message could be deemed to be inferring that the boy has other problems or is a problem - thats not your intention so just appreciate what othr advice you are being given and move on. I had experience of a person taking a fit in a workplace and they did not disclose that they had a form of epilepsy. this person would occasional work at heights and around lifting equipment in an industrail setting. My point is you have a distinct advantage that you know that this kid has a potential problem. I stress potential as there's no guarantee that a fit will occur during an evacuation (so the teacher should have a fair idea of the likelyhood during an evacuation). Stay focussed on what you want to achieve and talk with the appropriate people who know the kid better than you. It a fairly straight forward assignment that doesnt need to be complicated so try to stick with that.
mylesfrancis  
#14 Posted : 19 January 2012 12:29:40(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
mylesfrancis

Briano wrote:
The original message could be deemed to be inferring that the boy has other problems or is a problem - thats not your intention so just appreciate what othr advice you are being given and move on.
Yes, sir. Thank you, sir. I'll appreciate the advice of my elders and betters without question in future. Sorry for having the temerity to have an opinion.
Briano  
#15 Posted : 19 January 2012 13:14:55(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
Briano

People here are only trying to help you - know one shouldn't take exception to advice once its given with good intentions. As a member you should acknowledge that as the norm.
mylesfrancis  
#16 Posted : 19 January 2012 13:24:56(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
mylesfrancis

Briano wrote:
People here are only trying to help you - know one shouldn't take exception to advice once its given with good intentions. As a member you should acknowledge that as the norm.
Er, who was taking exception to advice? I questioned how what I was saying/suggesting would fall foul of the Equality Act - something which the poster hadn't elaborated on other than that one statement. What's wrong with seeking some clarification? The only thing I have taken exception to is your patronising responses. Perhaps you, also as a member, should acknowledge that we are all (supposedly) professionals here and to make comments like "just appreciate the advice you are given and move on" really does not help further any discussion.
Briano  
#17 Posted : 19 January 2012 13:45:47(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
Briano

Myles - it sound like you take exception to advice - you don't like to hear it and you don't want to accept it - its as simple as that in my humble opinion. Your reply to me had a lot of Sir's in it, and this to be was inappropriate and demonstrates some inmaturity on your behalf. There you go - lets see if you can resist the temptation to respond with garble
mylesfrancis  
#18 Posted : 19 January 2012 14:12:09(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
mylesfrancis

Sarcasm is obviously lost on you. The "Sir"s were in response to the patronising tone of your reply. So, a poster suggests I could "fall foul of the Equality Act". I question this statement which implicitly allows the poster to expand on their statement if they so desire, i.e. justify that statement. And that leads you to conclude that I don't want to hear or accept advice? For a supposedly professional person to come to that conclusion is simply staggering. I presume that you accept all advice you are given without question? Immaturity is also quite well demonstrated by silly little challenges about posters resisting the temptation to respond. And as for "garble" I suggest you re-read your posts on this thread - I'm still not entirely clear what "know one shouldn't take exception to advice" means. ;-)
stevedm  
#19 Posted : 19 January 2012 14:59:11(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
stevedm

Guys....Guys...we have a burning building and a child has just had an Tonic-clonic seizure...can we move personalities out of the way and deal with that... If you need additional guidance on first aid for staff and the policy on when or when not to call for additional help this should be put together with specific input from the patients care giver. I have some briefing slides but the stuff on the epilepsy website is good.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.