Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
B.Bruce  
#1 Posted : 25 January 2012 09:42:35(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
B.Bruce

Hi all,

Im looking for some advice regarding oversheeting of an asbestos roof.

During the recent strong winds one of our roofs was quite badly damaged. The roof was metal cladding sheeted over an asbestos cement corrugated roof. The strong winds have removed a substantial part of the metal roof. The asbestos roof was left undamaged during the storm - which was lucky given its age. The ACM sheets are still in good condition throughout. To paint a picture - the roof is approx. 4000 square metres.

Our insurers have given the green light to renew the metal roof and we have engaged a local roofing contractor to carry out the job. We have worked with the contractor many times in the past and their standards of safety are high. However, I'm looking for some advice on how they are proposing to attach the metal sheeting to the buildings roof structure.

They propose to anchor this with fixings drilled through the asbestos roof into the roof purlings at regular distances across the entire roof. Obviously, this raises concerns with me regarding the asbestos cement dust created during the drilling. To control this they propose to contain/collect the dusts by applying silcone sealant to the proposed hole location before drilling. I guess the idea is that this will dry containing the dusts.

Their employees do have asbestos awareness training.

I do have concerns about dusts falling through the hole - which is inevitable during drilling.

Having read the HSE Asbestos Essential A9 document, this describes a similar process. http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/guidance/a9.pdf

Just wondering, does anyone have any experience of similar activities?
boblewis  
#2 Posted : 25 January 2012 11:02:37(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
boblewis

Just to clarify - Are you referring to basic AA or to the next level up for working with non licensed asbestos? If the former the training needs to be improved.

I have had this situation in a previous life and have affixed polythene sheeting to the underside of the roof and then carefully removed this post work using alloy towers and vacuum cleaners.

Bob
Ron Hunter  
#3 Posted : 25 January 2012 11:15:40(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ron Hunter

The contractor would require non-licensed training in accordance with CAR Reg10.
I'm with Bob regarding improved control on the underside, which will require additional face-fit testing for those doing the clean up.
Although not strictly required, you might want to think about reassurance air and swab sampling at the end of the job to provide your employees with some comfort. Analytical companies who do these tests would also be best placed to advise you on appropriate safe methods and competency of contractors.

I am left pondering the circumstance whereby the existing metal roof has blown off but the asbestos cement roof is unaffected. What is the current metal cladding fixed to?
B.Bruce  
#4 Posted : 25 January 2012 11:55:47(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
B.Bruce

Hi Bob

Thanks for your input.

Youre right - I need to ascertain the level of training their operators have.

I had thought of undersheeting but this will be a huge job on a 4000 square metre roof - was looking for an alternative. However, unless I can think of or hear of an alternative I will have to 'enforce' this with the insurers/roofers.

cscburford  
#5 Posted : 25 January 2012 12:27:49(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
cscburford

Hi, have just seen this thread if you read HSG210 it will tell you all the does and don'ts with regard to how to do the work, what ppe, type of equipment & training. What it does not tell you is that the hover (H type) will need to be emptied in a notifyed area that they need insurance to work with asbestos and the waste (from the hover) comes under the hazard's waste regulations & ADR
one other point is that swab testing is not a recommended test as you can get fibers in any invariament including buildings that do not have asbestos in them
B.Bruce  
#6 Posted : 25 January 2012 13:36:16(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
B.Bruce

Thanks all for the replies.

The problem I have is this.......

I have read the Asbestos Essentials A9 (cscbuford - I presume this is the same document taken from HSG210 as the HSE website directs you to it).

On page 2 under Procedure, the first line reads-

"Protect nearby surfaces from contamination. Cover with 500gauge polythene sheeting and fix with duct tape to nonasbestos surfaces."

I take from this that you protect nearby surfaces with polythene - what if there are not any nearby surfaces and the building is in fact empty - albeit apart from racking?

It would be very difficult to protect the legs of racking from contamnation and this is well below the underside of the roof.


B.Bruce  
#7 Posted : 25 January 2012 13:41:55(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
B.Bruce

Incidentally - for the record....Asbestos cement products are covered by ADR special provision 168 and as such ARE NOT regarded as dangerous for carriage.
bod212  
#8 Posted : 25 January 2012 14:32:36(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
bod212

Whoever does the work will need UKATA Category B training or equivalent as this work is 'planned' on a non licensable material. Be aware that depending on when the job is actually done it might actually come in to the new category of 'Notifiable Non Licensed Work' but that would hinge on the condition of the AC. The process might not generate that much waste and would certainly not fall into 'ADR'. Check Asbestos: The Licensed Contractors' Guide HSG247, pg 90 for more info.
Putting a blob of sealant in theory is good practice but AC sheets are usually 5-6mm thick and take a bit of drilling. So there is a risk that the sealant material might dry out or not penetrate adequately.
Can the metal purlins be exposed by selected removal of some AC sheets to remove the need to drill them?
Could 'shadow vacuuming' be employed during a drilling process? Externally or internal, or both? if the building is empty save for racking this would surely make internal access relatively easy (from a MEWP, say).
IF drilling is unavoidable I would be at least consulting with the enforcing agency as they might have a differing view. If control limits are likely to be breached then it would be notifiable anyway.
Representative air monitoring, both personal and static, would be a recommendation as well as this might then inform and endorse a particular method. Especially over such a large surface area as you have stated.
As Ron says above it is intriguing how the metal cladding was fixed on prior to the damage.
B.Bruce  
#9 Posted : 25 January 2012 15:43:21(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
B.Bruce

Hi Gerry - thanks for your reply.

You say whoever does the work will need UKATA Cat B training - I'm struggling to find where this is stipulated in guidance or legislation - could you point me in the right direction? Or is this best practice?

I agree about the sealant - that was my thoughts entirely. The purlins cant be exposed and given the size and extent of the re-sheeting required we would need to remove AC running the entire length - effectively 50% of the roof - which is uneconomical.

Shadow vacuuming could be used externally or internally and this is something im keen to explore when the project team meets again on Friday. We are all going up for a closer look on a MEWP (harness to be worn and I hate heights!).

The operators would be wearing PPE and the building below would be empty so exposure limits would not be breached. The size/volume of the building allows for a substantial number of air changes per hour - again reducing likelihood of exposure limits being met.

The metal sheeting was fixed to wooden straps which were drilled and fixed onto the AC sheets. Quite a poor job really, although the insurers have surveyed the site and are happy with the previous method of fixings - which is rather strange to say the least! Some of the wooden straps were batons from pallets - quite shocking really.
B.Bruce  
#10 Posted : 25 January 2012 15:57:19(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
B.Bruce

I forgot to add - I dont think the changes to the NNLW have not yet been implemented yet. The consultation was only completed and closed in October 2011 with IOSH submitting their response in early November (just found that out - im not that good!).
Ron Hunter  
#11 Posted : 25 January 2012 16:56:35(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ron Hunter

B.Bruce wrote:
whoever does the work will need UKATA Cat B training - I'm struggling to find where this is stipulated in guidance or legislation - could you point me in the right direction? quote]

L143 Reg 10 page 38 refers. The Category designation though is I think a short-code invention of UKATA.
B.Bruce  
#12 Posted : 25 January 2012 17:08:08(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
B.Bruce

bod212  
#13 Posted : 26 January 2012 10:39:41(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
bod212

L143, para 124 (b) specifies what is needed in this case. Yes, Category B training is UKATA terminology. Other training organisations are available.
No, the NNLW category has not yet been implemented. It is strongly expected that the revised CAR will be published in April.
I kind of thought that given the area of the roof that the removal of AC sheets might prove uneconomical.
You mention in your fourth paragraph about air changes etc. Don't confuse this with work in enclosures where air changes are a significant factor. The methods of working will determine the level of asbestos fibres in air and is the key factor to consider. And the main thing to consider is the 'control limit (0.1 f/ml)'. The size of the building and the air changes are not a key factor in my opinion. It is the intensity and duration of exposure generated at the point of work.
B.Bruce  
#14 Posted : 27 January 2012 15:56:45(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
B.Bruce

Hi all,

Had a meeting with the roofers today. They have the necessary Cat B training and they talked me through their process. We intend to use a paste made of PVA glue and a cowling connected to a H-class vacuum. We will also be undertaking personal monitoring on everyone for at least 2 days (not consecutive).

I have discussed the process with a reputable asbestos removal company and they are happy with our plan.

Thanks to eveyone who responded with advice - you were a great help.

cheers
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.