Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Trinisafe  
#1 Posted : 27 January 2012 00:31:20(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
Trinisafe

Greetings from Trinidad and Tobago.. I am from the Caribbean branch,I am new in a company I'm with as HSE Manager however management wants to review its PPE and dress code policy,one of the main concerns I have is the new policy requires male employees to have short hair meaning neatly cut, no ponytails as well as to be clean shaved. However existing currently there are a few employees with dreadlocks and beards. Can I get some feed back from you professionals how do I implement and enforce this rule with least damage.
teh_boy  
#2 Posted : 27 January 2012 09:08:47(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
teh_boy

trinisafe wrote:
Greetings from Trinidad and Tobago.. PPE and dress code policy.
Dress code policy implies this is not a safety related decision - I am only aware of UK employment and so can't offer much further advice on the dress code side of things. If it is the requirement of risk assessment then it must be clear that no alternative solution exists. PPE is at the bottom of the hierarchy of control for a reason, when this has personal implications it is even more important alternative solutions are found. It might help if you told us what the hazard was - I assume it's RPE (respiratory protective equipment) or BA (breathing apparatus) related? If this is the only control measure then including the work force in completion of the risk assessment, and then communicating the findings and reasons behind the decision are the place to start.
dennish  
#3 Posted : 27 January 2012 09:32:02(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
dennish

welcome Trinisafe, Can you clarify if are you being asked to review the dress code policy for genuine safety concerns, if so waht are they eg risk of entanglement, PPE not fitting correctly etc. or is the purely for corporate image ?.
Merv  
#4 Posted : 27 January 2012 09:46:22(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Merv

Trini, be careful and check local legislation on "freedom of religious expression" Merv
Trinisafe  
#5 Posted : 27 January 2012 10:07:02(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
Trinisafe

The nature of the job is servicing and repairing mostly rotating equipment.There is the risk of Harzadous gases which can arise at any time and the employee has to use a BA (breathing apparatus). These employees also do painting on intervals that requires respiratory equipment. Its the requirement of the risk assessment as well and a concern where the PPE does not fit correctly such as Safety Helmets and Respirators when the hierarchy of control is used in this situation there is no cost benefit since the organisation is small and these employees were hired on to do these jobs,administrative and engineering controls becomes impractical.
MB1  
#6 Posted : 27 January 2012 10:32:23(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
MB1

Hi Trini, You really need to work closely with your HR department regarding new policies that may affect different laws etc and also ensure you can defend your reasons for stipulating certain requirements and why?
David Bannister  
#7 Posted : 27 January 2012 10:50:31(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
David Bannister

Hi Trinisafe, it's certainly true that long hair and rotating equipment are a bad match, just as beards and close-fitting RPE are. As others have said there are likely to be very strong views on why individuals have their particular hair styles and using safety and health as a means to change this is setting you up as the "bad guy" I am assuming that a process and substance change has been considered and rejected as being too costly! A close-fitting head covering such as a turban may be one possible solution whilst there are air-fed respirators that provide full head coverage are available. Neither of these does anything to address the company stance on short hair/clean shaven but as others have said, this is a different management issue and should be separated from the safety and health considerations. Finally, the labour laws in T&T may well be a major deciding factor in the way your management resolve the issue.
Zimmy  
#8 Posted : 28 January 2012 15:16:51(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Zimmy

This is a joke post yea? Provided that you wear correct PPE (hair net.hat etc) then no probs. Short hair/clean shaved? If you need to wear face mask/ BA kit then perhaps a change of roll for you is called for.
Frank E  
#9 Posted : 28 January 2012 19:11:13(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Frank E

My thoughts too. Seems rather an abuse of the aims of HS&W provisions to use them to enforce uniformity. I think your company is chancing it suggesting that "safety helmets might not fit. You could have a policy that all long hair, whether men's women's, dreaded, straight, curly be tied up and tucked in as is common in clinical & immediate care, catering, uniformed services, construction and enginering construction settings. I know many people with dreads in all walks of life; clinicians; doctors, nurses, paramedics, medical students, where one might think cross-contamination might be used as an excuse for discrimination, in food and catering... in fact I can think of a few other people working with rotating equipment and condition monitoring who have dreadlocks. It's not common as hippies (the group of people I know most likely to sport dreads) don't generally get involved in oil and gas (where RE is most prevalent here), for some reason. I know many more people with beard and peyos working in hospitals in Israel and in Magen David Adom, Zaka (founded by men with beards) and United Hatzalah where common sense is applied. I (as a bit of a hippy student) had dreadlocks, still have a beard and worked offshore in uni vacations servicing and carrying out planned and reactive maintenance on rotating equipment in potentially explosive atmospheres. I can't remember issues with face fit tests for the BA sets, smoke hoods etc but even back then industry tended to manage the hazards with permit to work controls, guards, lockouts, fixed fire and gas systems, portable gas detection, ventilation systems etc. I'm struggling to think of any situations where there were open rotating systems. Now thinking about it, with a thicker layer of hair my hard hat stayed on more when I had dreadlocks than it does with my current short hair and a [scaffolders] hard hat with ratchet. It begs the question what state is the plant in and what controls are there to manage rotating and gas hazards before they even become hazards to people with beards and dreads? As other posters have mentioned you should also be satisfying the safety controls hierarchy higher up elimination>substitution>engineering controls>administrative controls> ie guards, M&E lockouts, spindown before PPE> health monitoring. I'm quite astounded to see H&S used for such possibly discriminatory purposes in T&T and would have though it would be more common here in the UK! I worked in an Embassy of Trinidad and Tobago in the 90s, BTW. I can check the law, there's a member of our shul from T&T who trained as a lawyer, though I won't see her for a few weeks.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.