Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Jamesputman  
#1 Posted : 28 February 2012 15:54:32(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Jamesputman

Hi All, I would appreciate your views on where the above sits in terms of scope of communal area fire risk assessments in residential accommodation. If such a ventillation system is common between private dwellings, but not the communal areas (apart from ducting etc routed from common areas) would you consider it to be the duty of the fire risk assessor (externally appointed) to inspect and make recommendations relating to the extraction systems common to the private dwellings?
bob youel  
#2 Posted : 29 February 2012 10:06:19(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
bob youel

In my personal view such areas should be covered by the fire RA as these appear to be communial areas and service shafts where communial pipework etc. is located and communial storage / plant rooms inclusive of external to the building areas should also be included To date in my personal experience I have found many fire RA's to be poor to say the least
KevinB  
#3 Posted : 29 February 2012 10:42:11(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
KevinB

Hi all, I work within the residential property management sector and have conducted numerous FRA's on this type of property. It is not unusual for the lease to state that these systems are the responsibility of the lessee if they exclusively serve the apartment. However, from your query these are interlinked and therefore would probably fall under the remit of the managing agent. It is my personal opinion that the extraction & ductwork would fall within the remit of the FRA whether serving a single apartment or all. These systems are an integral part of the property and a means of fire spread and as such are a hazard which should be addressed. The only exception to this is if the system is sealed away and the assessor has no information or access to the system. Last year I conducted a risk assessment after a fire and the same situation with the extraction systems was evident; needless to say that a large proportion of the assessment was dedicated to reducing the risks from this system. I must also agree with Bob in that most FRA’s are of very poor quality and are prepared to a price rather than to ensure compliance.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.