Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
hogan  
#1 Posted : 06 March 2012 13:43:46(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
hogan

If an over 3 day accident was logged with HSE as RIDDOR reportable and then it was established that the injured person had intentially caused damage to the access equipment to create the correct environment for an accident to occur resulting in an injury etc. Would the RIDDOR still stand? I appreciate it was an incident at work and three days plus was taken off due to it and there would be all sorts of other implications because of the deemed actions of the injured person, but would, could or should the RIDDOR reported incident be retracted. I am sorry if this is a little vague but the question has been asked of me and I have not had experience of this occuring in the past and I believe that the Report prabably cannot be retracted and there is a bigger issue with the circumstances of a person creating this type of injury. I would appreciate anyones experiences or opinions.
Lawlee45239  
#2 Posted : 06 March 2012 13:48:25(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Lawlee45239

i would think it was
MB1  
#3 Posted : 06 March 2012 13:59:26(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
MB1

I'm not aware you can retract such a thing once 'logged' with HSE, but as part of your investigation you can record such. If this was followed up by the HSE/EHO you will have evidence to show it was thoroughly investigated and what actions you took?
freelance safety  
#4 Posted : 06 March 2012 13:59:28(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
freelance safety

Yes, I’ve been in this situation and as a consultant deliberated this with my clients HR Department and a solicitor who works as an associate. This would still be reportable however, what you have identified is a possible issue that may be deemed a causational factor. From this your SSOW and practices should be analysed to see what, if anything, needs to be reviewed/revised and possibly amended/changed to prevent a possible reoccurrence. This should also be addressed in any possible civil claim for the future. Feel free to PM me if you need any further assistance.
HSSnail  
#5 Posted : 06 March 2012 14:37:27(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
HSSnail

Under the old RIDDOR report centre system you could withdraw reports where it turned out the injury had not been caused by the work activity, not sure how you would do it now. However in the incident you describe the 3 days off work is as a result of a work activity so I think RIDDOR will apply. If we have all the facts its sound as if the breach will be section 8 as the employee had deliberately interfered with equipment, but its still reportable. RIDDOR is not about blame its about injuries resulting from a work activity.
jde  
#6 Posted : 07 March 2012 13:53:15(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
jde

The incident would still be reportable under RIDDOR however, if your investigation has uncovered the definite cause and it was manufactured to cause the incident, then ensure your findings are reported also. You may then take further action depending on company policy against the person who interfered with items provided for safety.Obviously your proof would need to be solid and there would be the possibility of prosecuting the culprit for attempted fraud.
hogan  
#7 Posted : 07 March 2012 15:58:59(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
hogan

Many thanks for your comments.
JohnW  
#8 Posted : 07 March 2012 16:19:38(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
JohnW

I agree with Brian's comment, i.e. the accident was due to work activity and is therefore RIDDOR. In the investigation, say following a 5-whys procedure, you would need to consider why the operative tampered with the equipment. Was it lack of competence? Was his training thorough enough so that he would have known his actions were not appropriate, indeed dangerous? Or was it an intentional wrongful action?
Ron Hunter  
#9 Posted : 07 March 2012 16:55:06(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ron Hunter

I take it internal disciplinary procedures have been initiated. Nothing you can do to retract or alter the RIDDOR, but woe betide the employee if HSE decide to follow this up, they could be charged with a s.8 offence!
JohnW  
#10 Posted : 07 March 2012 17:30:56(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
JohnW

Ron, I know you mean HE could be charged with a s.8 :o)
blodwyn  
#11 Posted : 08 March 2012 09:46:52(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
blodwyn

JohnW wrote:
Ron, I know you mean HE could be charged with a s.8 :o)
Wouldnt that be a turn up for the books!!?
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.