Chas There are several risk profiling questionnaires of this kind. There value depends on the evidence of the level of scientific reliability and validity with which they've been designed. While published information about records of driving behaviour e.g. incidents, accidents, injuries and fatalities, with high levels of reliability and valdiity would be valuable, it's difficult to know how it is compiled or indeed why it would be published in view of its commercial sensitivity. If you state what specific decisions you and your senior management wish to make by using the 'toolkit' or questionnaire to which you refer, I'll see if I can provide some information about tools with well-proven validity in assessing risk behaviour relevant to these decisions.

The examples given by 'Buzzlightyear' indicate lack of the most elementary kind of 'face validity', when even 'face valid' questions, i.e. which aren't so obviously transparent, don't support any of other more demanding kinds of validity. If you want to use well-designed measures of risk-taking tendencies, you can find ones published by Hogan Assessments Inc, Tulsa, in the USA and by PCL Consultancy in Tunbridge Wells, Kent. Concept mapping may be a more useful way of designing a bespoke process of assessment that meets needs you define yourself. 'Concept Mapping Planning and Research', Mary Kane & William A Trochim, Sage, 2007 is a good guide; Trochim, a professor at Cornell University, is one of the leading gurus on qualitative and quantitative methods. Concept mapping includes using cluster analysis and multidimensional scaling, they can be used with the Excel statistical addin, XLStat. if you wish to use concept mapping but are not familiar with how to apply them, you can pm me.