Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Jamesputman  
#1 Posted : 27 April 2012 11:06:05(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Jamesputman

Hi All,

I wondered whether anyone could point me in the direction of some wording which could be used to set out the scope of the above and the limitations of a standard FSO fire risk assessment, as opposed to a full fire safety audit of a building, systems and processes.

I would also appreciate your views on whether you would typically expect the following to be addressed in detail in a fire risk assessment, fire safety audit, or both:
Allocation of risk profiles and management levels in accordance with BS 9999
Detailed comment on fire safety management strategies and organisational structure
Detailed guidance on evacuation strategies for disabled persons
Maximum room capacities broken down into defind areas throughout a building including separate rooms on the same floor

Thanks in advance for any input offered
Jamesputman  
#2 Posted : 27 April 2012 17:05:16(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Jamesputman

To simplify my question:

What are your views on what should be included in a Fire Safety Audit beyond what is covered in a Fire Risk Assessment?
Bob Shillabeer  
#3 Posted : 27 April 2012 17:43:57(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Bob Shillabeer

Interesting question, but one that is somewhat confusing. A fire risk assessment is a legally required action and looks at the risk of fire and how it affects people evacuation as the most important thing. There are add-ons that cover the other aspects of fire related problems; it is from a "what do we need" basis. A fire safety audit is a check to ensure you have all the required controls and practices in place and that they are followed. An audit cannot find anything until there is something in place to check so why are the two separate processes being confused?
Jake  
#4 Posted : 29 April 2012 11:53:43(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Jake

I'd agree with Bob. In simple terms a fire risk assessment will tell you what the risks are and what control measures you need. A fire safety audit would be a check that the control measures identified in the fire risk assessment are being implemented.

Going back to the original post, all the information you state should be covered by the FRA and then checked during audits.
messyshaw  
#5 Posted : 29 April 2012 15:28:53(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
messyshaw

I am a bit confused about the concept of an audit. I thought the RP carried out FRAs (& reviews) and the enforcing authority carry out audits (of the systems introduced as a result of the FRA)to ensure compliance

So in terms of a RP led audit, what is the difference between a fire safety audit and a review of fire risk assessment???

And where does the concept of a RP led fire safety audit come from, coz it certainly ain't the RRO, whereas a review is?

If you have an annual review, and a 6 monthly audit, why not just do 6 monthly FRA reviews?
Bob Shillabeer  
#6 Posted : 29 April 2012 16:03:20(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Bob Shillabeer

Messy, Hope the rain isn't too bad with you, it has been raining quite heavy with me all day, but that's Gods will I suppose. Audit is not just a tool for the enforcing authority to use, it is a normal management tool used to check how well things are being managed. As an auditor for many years I have used it in many disciplines. Audit looks at how well things are managed and to what standard and then to identify any improvements that can be made. It has nothing to do with the RRFSO. The term audit or review basically means the same except an audit looks at what is applied and a review is about what can be applied to improve.
KAJ Safe  
#7 Posted : 30 April 2012 12:10:16(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
KAJ Safe

Just to muddy the water some more, this is how it was explained to me on the Nebosh fire cert.
Carry out an audit of the site, questions such as
"flammable substance on site"
"fire detection"
"testing"
"certain processess"

From this, anything which required attention was then risk assessed, for example:
LPG on site, control measures were, stored away from building, kept in locked cages.

Although this is only a very basic idea, I can give you the Nebosh fire risk assessment practical (if this is any good)
jay  
#8 Posted : 30 April 2012 12:21:48(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
jay

It seems you are asking the difference between a fire risk assessment as per the RRFSO requirements and the more rigourous fire loss surveys/assessments insurers and the like undertake.

The former is primarily to ensure that there is no injury to persons or loss of life whereas the latter also take into account loss control of assets.
Bob Shillabeer  
#9 Posted : 30 April 2012 14:06:04(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Bob Shillabeer

Hi Cuttell, I attended the Fire Service Training College fire risk assessment process some years ago and have kept up my understanding by looking at various other courses over the years and have studied BS9999. But not had the pleasure of seeing the NEBOSH FRa practical so could you kindly let me have a copy please?
Bob Shillabeer  
#10 Posted : 30 April 2012 15:05:28(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Bob Shillabeer

Hi Cuttell, thanks for trying to send me a message but I am unable to open it because I think there is a problem with the system so will try again later. Thanks anyway.
Users browsing this topic
Guest (3)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.