Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Ryan.Donald  
#1 Posted : 05 June 2012 20:19:32(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Ryan.Donald

Hi all I am currently handing out DSE assessment forms in my work. If for example a colleague answers no to having a foot rest but their knee goes below the waist, which I am sure would justify the need for one, but they do not want one. DO I have to put my employer through the expense of buying them one, even though they dont need it but they have said they have not got one on the assessment. Do I have to act on any discrepancies? If I have not lost you could you lend some advice Thanks
LeeHoward  
#2 Posted : 05 June 2012 21:10:19(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
LeeHoward

Hi It may be advisable to ask you legal department to draw up a waiver however every avenue needs to be checked such as - providing the necessary information- effects signs and symptoms of problems so forth, instruction safety signs etc being placed around the work place or simply make them have one refusing managerial request and all that, training on aspects of dse usage and supervision, by the time you finished doing these things they will be more than glad to have one under their desk and don't forget health surveillance. My point is that you also have a duty to your employer to reduce any chance of liability and by covering every aspect you cover your own behind.
Bob Shillabeer  
#3 Posted : 06 June 2012 00:13:41(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Bob Shillabeer

Ryan what makes you believe that the knees must be at waist level? I would find that rather uncomfortable as my waist is above my rear end and to have to use a foot rest to achieve that position would soon make me stop using the foot rest (therefore a waste of money buying one). Lee is going a bit to legalistic for the problem in hand I'm afraid. There are many different suppliers who can advise on DSE assessment processes, perhaps you need to ask them about this situation, Can you adjust the desk to ensure correct posture of someone who may not be as tall as others and of course can you ensure the desk is high enough for those who are taller than others. Some people may like having thier legs lower than horizontal although that could cause some problems. The legal side of things will probably simply say you must comply with the DSE Regulations and get you no where. Common sense is the key to this problem (if there is one)/
A Kurdziel  
#4 Posted : 06 June 2012 10:04:10(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
A Kurdziel

You cannot force DSE equipment onto users, all you can do is offer it to them and advise them. If they do not want to use it that is their choice. There is no requirement in the regs to ensure that they are using it (Unlike the PPE regs which place a duty on the employer to make sure that staff use PPE and that there is a clear duty on staff to use PPE that has been issued to them). The DSE should not be about blindly following the Schedule, it should be about making sure that staff are able to work without discomfort or long term health issues.
jontyjohnston  
#5 Posted : 06 June 2012 12:30:14(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
jontyjohnston

Completely agree with Kurdziel. Also, don't forget that posture is an individual issue and no 2 people are exactly the same. When we moved to new offices we bought 350 new seats and facilities were a little surprised that I then purchased 6 different seats following DSE assessments, but these were following one to one assessments which showed that the individuals could not gain a comfortable posture using the seating provided.
chris.packham  
#6 Posted : 06 June 2012 12:48:01(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
chris.packham

Just to add to Bob Shillabeer's comment on leg positions, what about screen positions. As a spectacle wearer who uses varifocal lenses I find that the 'prescribed' screen height is simply wrong for me. To focus throught the relevant part of the spectacle lense I have to tilt my head back resulting in a pain in my neck should I have to use the computer for any length of time. Lowering the screen results in a much more comfortable position, even if this does not conform.
Rob M  
#7 Posted : 06 June 2012 12:54:54(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Rob M

No, If you have provided guidance and training on the correct use of the workstation and the client has stated that he or she dosent require a footrest, make a note of it on the form and ask the client to sign to confirm. This records the findings and provides protection should a claim come along.
barnaby  
#8 Posted : 06 June 2012 21:51:22(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Guest

Chris.Packham wrote:
Just to add to Bob Shillabeer's comment on leg positions, what about screen positions. As a spectacle wearer who uses varifocal lenses I find that the 'prescribed' screen height is simply wrong for me. To focus throught the relevant part of the spectacle lense I have to tilt my head back resulting in a pain in my neck should I have to use the computer for any length of time. Lowering the screen results in a much more comfortable position, even if this does not conform.
What you need is 'special corrective appliances'!
teh_boy  
#9 Posted : 07 June 2012 10:34:26(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
teh_boy

:) - this is a nice emotive topic Too much yoga sees me sitting with crossed legs - ARGHGHHHHHHHHHHH if I am assessing that one. Give me a footrest if you like, I'll just slide it back (that's where 90% of the ones I issue go) On a serious note - disclaimers mean nothing in UK law so be very cautious with their use. I do however get employees to sign to say they have a) been trained in how to sit at their desk and look after their posture b) been given the correct equipment c) know how to raise problems etc.. Posture is a very personal thing and I always say - wrong posture is ONLY OK if it's deliberate (note both me and Chris make an active Choice!) My concern is that I suffer from a back issue - If I was to sit in a classic pose when it is bad I would be unable to walk by the end of the day!!!! if I sit crossed legged it gets better.... deliberate choice, but I understand my body. However if I have employee slumped in a chair because they can't be bothered to engage stomach muscles or use the footrest - should I challenge this? Where is line... is it Friday yet? Good luck :)
Green40228  
#10 Posted : 07 June 2012 11:35:28(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
Green40228

This subject is such a personal issue as everyone has diffrent combinations of upper and lower leg length, body length and arm lengths etc etc. The real issue for the use of a footrest is whether the feet can be placed flat on the floor with the chair adjusted to the correct height for the user in relation to the correct arm position, which is the over-riding factor. If the feet are not capable of being placed flat on the floor, then that would suggest the need for a footrest. I would then provide the user with sufficient information and training to make a judgement for themselves whether they need a footrest, but with an instruction that any discomfort or aches and pains that occur should prompt a further workstation assessment, which may then require input from occupational health.
Safety butterfly  
#11 Posted : 08 June 2012 10:44:39(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Safety butterfly

I have to agree with Chris.Packham, I also wear varifocal lenses which causes me pain in the neck when spending long periods of time at my desk. I have to have my work station set with the screen quite low, which from time to time can cause comments within the office as it does look as though I do not practice what I preach. I do have an other question though, how often should a DSE assessments be carried out, other than when the workstation has been moved or altered in any way?
Zyggy  
#12 Posted : 08 June 2012 11:05:28(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Zyggy

Chris & Safety Butterfly, Regarding the problems you are having wearing varifocal lenses whilst using your PC/laptop (I assume because you need to look at a document & screen at the same time?) - have you tried using a pair of glasses appropriate to your screen + using a document holder at the same focal distance? This has worked for some of my colleagues in the past after a well known optician prescribed varifocals for DSE use & they all suffered similar problems. A chat with our OH Physician revealed that it was quite a common problem! Zyggy
Invictus  
#13 Posted : 08 June 2012 11:19:11(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Invictus

If they don't want one don't force them. Write on the form that they have stated that they don't want one and get them to sign it. State on the form that if they want one at a later date they will inform you in writing and leave it at that.
daveyj  
#14 Posted : 08 June 2012 11:22:37(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
daveyj

Great topic! Company I work for have provided DSE minnium requirement. However an individual has stated that they need to have there leg supported to a height of at least 300mm all day. As this is very specific should we be asking for a Fit Note? Thanks
Safety butterfly  
#15 Posted : 08 June 2012 11:25:45(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Safety butterfly

Hi Zyggy, Just to clarify, I wear these lenses because I am a Laboratory Technician, If I was to wear single vision lenses I would spend more time trying to find the correct pair for the work I am doing, which may be looking through microscopes, reading documents, filling in paperwork or working on my laptop. mmmmmmmmmm I would look like a walking advert for an opticians. :)
Buzby888  
#16 Posted : 08 June 2012 12:34:11(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Buzby888

Ryan, Why are you handing out DSE assessment forms? If there is not a problem why try to create one? Thousands of students/teachers/office staff work in schools/colleges and other industries all over the country all day/week/year long on computers without the need to be assessed. If operators have a problem, then yes, that needs to be looked into, but please do not go looking for them. By the way you cannot get anyone to sign a declaration which would remove an employers duty of care, that is an absolute. I think that a person who has a problem at a workstation should have it investigated and remedied through risk assessment and to my experience that is what happens, but everyone who starts in every workplace to work on DSE equipment should not be handed a DSE assessment form. Adapt the common sense approach and assess problems as they are noticed or requested, not on a worldwide scale.
Canopener  
#17 Posted : 08 June 2012 13:54:08(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Canopener

Firstly I tend to agree with Bob S, I don’t see that a knee being below the waist height is some sort of automatic criteria for having or needing a footrest. I personally find a slightly downward angle for my upper leg more comfortable and have been sitting like that for years with no apparent ill effect. You don’t need to go about WS assessments with a spirit level, protractor etc. We are all different and I think that people need to adopt a number of different postures over the course of a working day to be comfortable. I would also agree that the majority of foot rests do appear to be ‘abandoned’ underneath desks with few people using them. I have also found people using them when they don’t need to and actually creating a ‘stress’ point at their hip joint, which has lead to them suffering from LBP etc, I certainly don’t see that that there is any need, necessity or significant advantage for a ‘waiver’ or ‘disclaimer’; nor do I think that it is appropriate in this case to do so. That has all the makings of a DM ‘elf and safety gone mad’ article. However, re #9, I don’t believe that it is the case that “..disclaimers mean nothing in UK..”. Some disclaimers are perfectly reasonable, acceptable, valid and ‘enforceable’ at law; many are not for various reasons, often unfair contract terms act 1977. That isn’t to say that all disclaimers are worthless. The use of this site for example are subject to terms of use and a liability disclaimer http://www.iosh.co.uk/te...f_use.aspx#Liabilitydisc
chris.packham  
#18 Posted : 08 June 2012 14:22:26(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
chris.packham

Just to clarify the issue with varifocals. With varifocals the focal length of the lens varies as you move down the lens. The part at the top is for distance vision. The part that I use to look at the computer screen is just below the middle and the part that I use to read is at the bottom. So having the laptop simply on the desk means that the normal head position results in me looking at the screen through the correct part of the lenses resulting in the screen being in focus. I can also read anything I need to read whilst typing without having to move my head up and down. Raising the screen to the "correct" height means that I am then trying to look at it through the distance part of the lenses and the screen is thus out of focus. To have it in focus I have to tilt my head back to bring the correct part of the lens into line with the screen. Result:- (a) I get a crick in my neck and (b) I have to move my head down each time I need to read something on the desk, then raise it again to look at the screen. I don't think that this is actually catered for in the DSE regulations. Chris
A Kurdziel  
#19 Posted : 08 June 2012 14:32:16(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
A Kurdziel

As the regulations and our old friend, common sense, make clear, you do not have to set up a workstation in accordance with a fixed layout which then might cause someone have to have a crick in the neck or otherwise suffer discomfort. Are there really DSE assessors out there who would prefer to set up a ‘correct’ workstation which causes more problems rather than trying to make people more comfortable with a workstation that does not conform to the diagram in the nice HSE booklet?
Reed Jason  
#20 Posted : 08 June 2012 14:36:37(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
Reed Jason

Surely a foot rest is not needed unless the individual is unable to - A. Place their feet firmly on the floor in a suitable sitting postion B. Are unable to adjust their chair to acheive the above I'm not sure where this demand for foot rests in the office has surfaced from but its just not required in the vast majority of cases.
Ryan.Donald  
#21 Posted : 09 June 2012 18:01:47(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Ryan.Donald

Hi Bubbz, The reason I have decided to hand them out is because there has been a couple of queries regarding the assessment, the previous QHSE advisor handed them out every twelve months (the next one is due 13/06, I have looked at the past DSE assessments and there has been no action on any of them. People have said no to having a footrest yet they still dont have one, my main worry is that the absence of the footrest is now recorded but no remedial action has been taken. I have had a meeting with all the office staff and explained to them all the hazards and effects of a poorly laid out workstation, WRULD's etc...., there are signs and posters also. I would just like to know, as a disclaimer does not seem to be the way to go, am I better off providing a footrest, despite the cost to my employer. That way if they don't use it then my employer, along with myself are covered. Thanks all for the replies
Ryan.Donald  
#22 Posted : 09 June 2012 18:08:49(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Ryan.Donald

Rob M wrote:
No, If you have provided guidance and training on the correct use of the workstation and the client has stated that he or she dosent require a footrest, make a note of it on the form and ask the client to sign to confirm. This records the findings and provides protection should a claim come along.
Thanks very much for the reply
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.