Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Nev clifford  
#1 Posted : 22 June 2012 13:53:54(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
Nev clifford

We are receiving more and more safety data sheets with DNEL & PNEC following REACH registration of substances. I know we have 12months(from receipt of SDS) to implement risk management measures for workers and environmental exposure based on new available data.

There are two programs to tackle this available: EASE for making a simple assessment of worker exposure and EUSES for predicting environmental impact. I need a simpler way to assess these RMM’s.

I need a clarification on whether it is only when I receive e-SDS that I have to analyse workers exposure/environmental impact or is it also applicable to these new SDS’s with REACh registration number on them. Attached is an example of an SDS.

Any comments appreciated
teh_boy  
#2 Posted : 22 June 2012 14:16:43(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
teh_boy

I am trying my best to fathom what it is your're asking....

Can you clarify as I'm obviously not up to speed on all the abbreviations under REACH _ I knew most, but in the translation lost the point of the question.

Are you working under UK law? If so surely it's the CoSHH regs and associated Environmental regulation that are important.

I was confused the use of DNEL's - surely they are not relevant - it's WELs that are important in UK law?
Also isn;t the EASE tool used to set WELs??

Maybe it's time for a holiday as that question left me really confused - oh and I am on holiday as of.....

leadbelly  
#3 Posted : 22 June 2012 14:33:26(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
leadbelly

It is my understanding that, where a substance has both a WEL and a DNEL, we have to control to the lower of the two; please tell me I am wrong!

LB
A Kurdziel  
#4 Posted : 22 June 2012 15:31:16(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
A Kurdziel

COSHH is the regulation which employers should be following. The legal limits of exposure are the WELs.
Quote from HSE website- http://www.hse.gov.uk/coshh/detail/reach.htm
which says “a Derived No Effect Level for substances (DNEL). This is a benchmark not an exposure limit. The manufacturer or importer uses this DNEL to identify the correct Risk Management Measures for your task or procedure the exposure scenario.”
chris.packham  
#5 Posted : 22 June 2012 15:42:11(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
chris.packham

WELs are only relevant for inhalation exposure. When submitting their chemical hazard assessment for REACH the registrant is required to provide DNELs for inhalation, ingestion and skin. However, as far as I am aware there is no provision in the regulations to require workplace exposure to be limited to the DNEL. Indeed, as far as skin is concerned, this is impracticable.

“However, there is no scientific method of measuring the results of the body’s exposure to risk through dermal contact. Consequently no dermal exposure standards have been set.”
from “Occupational skin diseases and dermal exposure in the European Union (EU-25):policy and practice overview - European Agency for Safety and Health at Work

Back in the 1990s the Dermal Exposure Network of the EU (of which I was a member) spent 3 years looking at this and concluded that creating exposure limits for skin is simply not possible.

Consider also that the DNEL only applies to the actual substance. As soon as this is mixed, diluted, etc., then the DNEL is irrelevant as any exposure limit would have to relate to the mixture.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.