Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Richardgree  
#1 Posted : 27 June 2012 11:49:36(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Richardgree

I provide health and safety advise for a food manufacturing organisation A month ago an employee suffered a bumped to his head on a door. He was taken straight to A-E where he was decaled fit to return to work despite a nice lump on this forehead. The next day at work he complained of feeling unwell and went to the local hospital where he was given a CAT scan, the apparent outcome was that he had concussion/ delayed. He was then off for 2 weeks and a program of phased return to work was introduced. 2 days in to his return to work he went off again with the same complaints relating to the original incident. The organisation is now concerned as to his condition, ability to carry out this job and possibly that the individual is making the most of the situation as full pay has been paid throughout his absence. My opinion is that the organisation should send him to an independent specialist to evaluate this condition. I am aware that is a very delicate situation and it leads towards employment law. However, if anyone has any advice on this matter it would be much appreciated.
Psycho  
#2 Posted : 27 June 2012 13:11:48(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Psycho

did you do a riddor are you trying to say that the dr who has issued an unfit for work certificate is lying If your employee does not accept your proposals for adaptations you should discuss the reasons for their views with them in the first instance. If the situation cannot be resolved you may wish to consider obtaining an independent opinion from your OH provider There may be situations where differing opinions are expressed by the GP and OH doctor. This happens already, for example, when advising on whether an employee is fit to attend a disciplinary hearing. GPs are not OH experts and have been advised by the Medical Defence Societies to avoid giving opinions on fit notes which are outwith their clinical competence. It is generally accepted that the OH physician’s opinion overrides that of the GP, because of their greater understanding of the job. It can also be hard for GPs to give purely objective advice because of their “doctor-patient relationship if they are proved to be shirking you can then go down the disaplinary route however if you make a pooly person come back to work premiturily and this is proved when the letter comes through for the claim expect to pay alot more for the poor persons pain and suffering !!!!!!
Richardgree  
#3 Posted : 27 June 2012 15:07:41(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Richardgree

psycho Thanks for your input
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.