Rank: Guest
|
This topic has been on this site recently however I cannot find the original thread?
A member of our safety committee wants our employer to buy some defibrillators and train staff how to use them, the suggestion was backed up by another member of the committee siting the recent case of the Bolton Footballer Fabrice Muamba who had a heart attack whilst playing at Tottenham, from memory I remember several posters saying that they had withdrawn defibrillators from their premises after carrying out a risk assessment because the chances of someone having a heart attack at work near a defibrillator with a trained user handy were very slim, I also said that we had trained first alders on hand at all times and they should be able to keep the patient alive until the emergency services arrived, I also stated that all our buildings through out the country were in major towns and therefore close to general hospitals and ambulance stations, another major factor was the cost of each defibrillator and the training involved, I also seem to remember that the positioning and availability of trained staff was another issue? I hope I have recalled the correct thread? I too am a member of this committee and a union official I used these facts during the meeting but these members on the committee seem determined to carry this through, I feel we are going to be wasting our time and resources we work for a major government department who are cutting back on everything possible due to Austerity. Has anybody got any real evidence to back up my point of view or do you think defibrillators will be part and parcel of the first aid kit in the future?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
We have recently bought a single defibrillator. While having a trained person to use it is most desirable, they really are easy to use and anyone, trained or not, should be encouraged to try if the need arises. For that reason we have put it in an accessible place on our site and I have created a web page on our safety website to tell people all about it with links to the videos showing you how to use it.
We have also run a (free of charge) heart start session to raise awareness among the non-first aiders in basic life support. The course itself alerts people to the use of defibrillators where they are available. We hope to run more of these courses.
I went through all the same arguments as you, but in the end the majority decided to have one and I am happy with the decision.
I suspect that they will become common place in the future, but there is no obligation for you to have one at present.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Our safety committee went through this recently. We have offices that are either very small (4 or 5 people) or in major population centres and up to about 100 people. We concluded: There's lots of emotional stuff (what if you decide not to and someone dies ... what if it's your life you save ... how much do you think a life is worth anyway). Current pricing can be as low as £1000 purchase and around £50 pa consumables / maintenance. Further, the Resuscitation Council guidelines now do not mandate training: http://www.resus.org.uk/pages/AEDtrnst.htm “It is the view of the Resuscitation Council (UK) that the use of AEDs should NOT be restricted to trained personnel”, and similar statements in the current guidelines http://www.resus.org.uk/pages/aed.pdf However, the current consensus H&S professionals view seems to be AEDs should be deployed where there is a workforce of thousands, or large numbers of the general public (including potentially vulnerable people), or activities exacerbate the risk of cardiac arrest (eg strenuous sport). If you have a hundred people, and they are 'normally fit' working-age demographic doing office-type tasks then risk probably does not count as significant and very few such places have AED, and it (currently) would be exceeding normal good practice to provide one. Also relevant is that it's far from certain that an AED saves a life even if it is used. The manufacturers say coy things like 'success rates as high as 75% have been reported', but it seems like realistically the presence of an AED in the building turns an 8% chance of surviving a cardiac arrest into something like a 30% chance of surviving. We concluded that it would be affordable (to the business), and I'm sure if we got the choice we'd rather pay £1200 than have a fatality in the office. It's not legally necessary, it's not current normal practice (for an office of our size) but it might be regarded as best practice. Whether you want to present it as 'best practice' or whether you want to present it as 'gold-plating' depends upon what spin you want to present. We decided not to purchase AEDs for our offices.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Sean
This is a very difficult topic for many people at the moment. I think the evidence is very clear that if a defibrillator is available quickly then in certain circumstances your chances of survival is greatly improved. But your right many of these items will sit in the first aid kit and never be used. I have worked in an office environment for 26 years and no first aider has ever been called to provide CRP. Very difficult call to make.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
achrn wrote:Our safety committee went through this recently. We have offices that are either very small (4 or 5 people) or in major population centres and up to about 100 people. We concluded: There's lots of emotional stuff (what if you decide not to and someone dies ... what if it's your life you save ... how much do you think a life is worth anyway). Current pricing can be as low as £1000 purchase and around £50 pa consumables / maintenance. Further, the Resuscitation Council guidelines now do not mandate training: http://www.resus.org.uk/pages/AEDtrnst.htm “It is the view of the Resuscitation Council (UK) that the use of AEDs should NOT be restricted to trained personnel”, and similar statements in the current guidelines http://www.resus.org.uk/pages/aed.pdf However, the current consensus H&S professionals view seems to be AEDs should be deployed where there is a workforce of thousands, or large numbers of the general public (including potentially vulnerable people), or activities exacerbate the risk of cardiac arrest (eg strenuous sport). If you have a hundred people, and they are 'normally fit' working-age demographic doing office-type tasks then risk probably does not count as significant and very few such places have AED, and it (currently) would be exceeding normal good practice to provide one. Also relevant is that it's far from certain that an AED saves a life even if it is used. The manufacturers say coy things like 'success rates as high as 75% have been reported', but it seems like realistically the presence of an AED in the building turns an 8% chance of surviving a cardiac arrest into something like a 30% chance of surviving. We concluded that it would be affordable (to the business), and I'm sure if we got the choice we'd rather pay £1200 than have a fatality in the office. It's not legally necessary, it's not current normal practice (for an office of our size) but it might be regarded as best practice. Whether you want to present it as 'best practice' or whether you want to present it as 'gold-plating' depends upon what spin you want to present. We decided not to purchase AEDs for our offices. We went through the above process a year or so ago, and our report was very similar to what you detail. 1 point to reiterate is the type of site, proximity of hospitals and the ability for a paramedic to reach a casualty patient if required to do so. A defib may more appropriate to an industrial site that requires security (I.e. it would take a paramedic a long time to reach the patient). Any defibs are designed to be used by members of the public, they are fully self explanatory and you cannot actually operate them incorrectly (voice prompt system etc.). We submitted our report saying that in our office building in London they were not necessary, and were then told the board wanted one per floor (7 floors)! Sometimes you can never win (but it's a good bargaining tool for future investments that will actually make a demonstrable difference!)
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
On a lighter note, I saw a defib' last week with a large sign next to it saying "For emergency use only".
Errrr......as opposed to some sort of 'Leisure use' ??
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
FloorTester wrote:On a lighter note, I saw a defib' last week with a large sign next to it saying "For emergency use only".
Errrr......as opposed to some sort of 'Leisure use' ?? Was that at a "Adrenalin Junky Anonymous" meeting? When life’s too boring you need to electrocute yourself.. Given that they will not operate if a normal heartbeat is detected (no matter what button you press), it seems someone has missed the point!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
From the replies received so far I might be changing my mind about defibrillators, I was under the impression that they were only useful in certain circumstances and were able to give a "shock" if not used correctly, also surprised to hear that no training is required to use them.
Access and size of the building also seem to make a difference so it might be prudent to install a couple in a high rise block but not install any in a small building with just a few staff. Food for thought...
Floortester, loved the "for emergency use only" sign! Reminds me of a sign in the shop where I was going to get my ear pierced, "ears pierced while you wait"!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
We have three AEDs within our site and have unfortunatley had to use one once. The training delivered to our first aiders and the use of the defib saved the guys life.
Not using a defib is good and no excuse not to have one. There is always a chance of needing to use one and if you were the one lying on the floor then you would appreciate having one at hand.
If you are in an area where there are a few working premises, why don't you all get together and have one in a central area and just make people aware where it is held. A good first aider can carry out CPR until the defib arrives even after a few minutes, but I would always be happy to know that one is available.
Put a questionaire out to the workforce !
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
oneupu2 wrote: Not using a defib is good and no excuse not to have one. There is always a chance of needing to use one and if you were the one lying on the floor then you would appreciate having one at hand.
I can't parse "Not using a defib is good and no excuse not to have one", but as I said there's lots of emotional stuff (what if you decide not to and someone dies ... what if it's your life you save ... how much do you think a life is worth anyway). I don't find that very compelling to be honest - it smacks rather of "think of the children" as proving that the rational argument is weak, at best. There's always a chance that a fully trained paramedic would save someone's life, and I'm sure that if I were the one lying on the floor I would appreciate one being to hand, but we're not going to have one of them on standby in our premises either.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I think it depends on your industry/circumstances/location etc. There will as always been a number of different opinions, but I think that achrn and Brian make some very valid points at #3,4 and 10.
We have installed these in each of our leisure centres through a scheme with the community heartbeat trust and the community defib officer from our local ambulance service. Reduced cost of defibs, free initial and ongoing training and replacement consumables when used ‘in anger’. Defib has a ‘low maintenance’ regime.
We don’t have them in our main office or other ‘non leisure’ venues.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Hi Jane,
Great to see that the Heartstart sessions are starting to be embraced!!! Phil
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Sean
I, too, work in a large Govt department (MOD at Corsham).
If we can talk off-line I can give you all the in's and out's of the arguments as we have just gone through this too.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
At a defib course I delivered recently, as a bolt on to Heartstart; the occ. health department said that they appreciated the free training etc, but they would not have a defib on their premises, even a free one.
The misguided reason that they give for not having one was:
"If the ambulance service know you have a defib on site they will downgrade the call and the response time from a Cat "A" 8 minute response, down to a green cat "C" 1 hour response"
Luckily as an ambulance service part time employee, I was able to put them straight that ANY unconscious casualty not breathing would be a cat "A" 8 minute response, even if you had a cardiac Surgeon to push the said defibs shock button! I also had to reinforce the fact that they don't have transponder beacons or trackers fitted, (as they had been told), so how would the ambulance service knew you had one??
Please rearrange: Knowledge, a, dangerous, little, thing, is
Phil
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.