Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
aland76  
#1 Posted : 24 July 2012 12:08:35(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
aland76

Hi

I'm currently sourcing Safety Showers (x2) for a plant that is currently being commissioned, however I seem to find myself up against a brick wall when it comes to finding UK regs that have more than a fleeting reference to emergency showers. I'm aware that we (the UK) seem to follow the American National Standard for Emergency Eyewash and Shower Equipment (ANSI/ISEA Z358.1-2009), however with this not being a UK standard are we to follow it to the letter?

I ask because I'm currently being quoted £15k for the supply of 2x showers (ATEX rated which isn't helping the price!) which seems rather expensive, and I'm trying to reduce costs without falling below an acceptable standard in either safety or quality.
The unit I am looking at has a guaranteed 15 minutes of tepid water which meets ANSI/ISEA Z358.1-2009, however units are being sold in the UK by reputable retailers with lower flow times (6-7 mins) where they state that the shower meets ANSI Z358.1-2004, so is this also an acceptable standard?

Any thoughts / input gratefully received, the safety of the guys on the plant is and always will be my priority; however I don't want to waste thousands by over-engineering the showers!

Alan
PH2  
#2 Posted : 24 July 2012 13:05:35(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
PH2

Hi Alan,
we encountered a similar problem a few years ago. The British Standard for Safety showers for laboratories (BS 15154 -1) stipulates a flow rate of 60l/min. As you know the ANSI standard is 75l/min. The British standard for safety eye was units (BS 15154 -2) is 6l/min. The ANSI standard is 11.5l/min.

We had to specify the ANSI standard at a couple of water treatment works, because of the bulk quantities of acids stored in large tanks there. Some suppliers reps tried to fob us off with kit to the laboratory standard, but we went with the more expensive showers (thankfully they have never been needed). Never had to specify an ATEX compatible unit.

PH2
JJ Prendergast  
#3 Posted : 24 July 2012 13:27:54(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
JJ Prendergast

I can also agree with your findings, I came up against a similar problem when I had to source some safety showers for a project I worked on last year.

I only found the standard you mention.

Quite surprisingly as, PH2 has mentions, there doesn't appear to be a British Standard for a full body emergency shower.
Jane Blunt  
#4 Posted : 24 July 2012 14:23:48(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Jane Blunt

If the showers are indoors, do make sure they specify a suitable floor covering and some means for removing the water.

I was 'blessed' with a number of showers, installed indoors, that discharged directly onto the floor. When I challenged it the installer stated that the Standard did not specify drains (!).
JJ Prendergast  
#5 Posted : 24 July 2012 14:39:57(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
JJ Prendergast

AlanD76 wrote:
Hi

I ask because I'm currently being quoted £15k for the supply of 2x showers (ATEX rated which isn't helping the price!) which seems rather expensive, and I'm trying to reduce costs without falling below an acceptable standard in either safety or quality.


Forgot to mention - why are you looking at ATEX rated showers?

If the water is coming from an external source or is gravity fed - then there will be no electrical element to the showers. (any water heater can also be at a remote distance)

If the shower & heater is outside of the hazardous area for the plant (Zone 2 etc), then what is the ATEX issue? Mechanical sparks / ignition from moving a handle etc???

Certainly the fluid isn't a problem!!

When I was looking last year, I don't recall any raised eyebrows for the shows NOT being ATEX rated - this was at an oil refinery.
aland76  
#6 Posted : 24 July 2012 16:11:49(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
aland76

Thanks for the replies so far folks, much appreciated :)

Just to clarify:

- The showers need to be ATEX rated as at least 1 will be located within a zone 1 explosive atmosphere area, the other will be bolted onto the fencing of the zone 1 area. I can probably shave a few hundred pounds off by only specifying only one unit as ATEX but to be honest I'd prefer both units as ATEX rated because of the proximity, also there could never be a mix-up regarding which unit was installed within the zone 1 area.

- The showers will be located outdoors and the water allowed to run to the nearest drain. The site is bunded and all surface water is channeled through an effluent plant so drainage isn't really an issue.

I've been on the phone with suppliers today asking if there are cheaper alternatives that meet the regs (!?), managed to shave some of the top end off, every little helps!

Looking at it I don't think a 6-7 minute drench time is adequate, regardless of whether it meets a ANSI/ISEA standard, the guys will be dealing with bulk deliveries of caustic (55%) and sulphuric acid (96%), and also potential methanol so that 15 minutes drench period is a must I think, I've just found it very frustrating trying to pin down exactly what standards we should be working to regarding these showers!

Alan
JJ Prendergast  
#7 Posted : 24 July 2012 16:48:23(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
JJ Prendergast

As previous, provided any water electrical heaters are outside of the Zoned areas, then just from the mechanical point of view I think you will struggle to get certified ATEX rated showers.

I think I'm pretty experienced with ATEX issues, but I'm always prepared to learn more!!

Only had cause to look into safety showers on the example last year for this particular type of problem at an oil refinery - but to find an ATEX rated shower I would be interested to hear about.

As I'm sure you are aware ATEX is primarliy concerned with electrical equipment in hazardous areas. Just a shower head and pipework is obviously just a fixture/mechanical item.

Are there any electrical sounders/lights/alarms fitted on the showers you are elooking at?

BS EN 13463-1:2009 'Non electrical equipment for use in potentially explosive atmospheres' is a standard that looks like it should be applied to the showers. Its a method for assessing such equipment, as the title suggests.

However what is your source of ignition on the showers to make them ATEX rated? - the most obvious would be the heat induced by the warm water (it only needs to be 30-40*C - we are not talking domestic showers at 60-70*C) - so the Temperature Class would be T6 at most for the max surface temperature of 85*C.

Methanol flash point is about 12*C so there could be a problem there.

This risk could be minimised by safe routing of the water pipes and insulating the pipes.

Why is it not possible to put the showers outside of the zoned area? Unless at high pressure, the zoned area is not likely to be more than a few meters in radius.

The only other source of ignition would be mechanical friction and sparks as any mechanical valves/handles are moved - but as the internal workings of the shower will be wet and/or probably made of brass, copper then this seems an unlikely source of ignition.

BSEN 1127-1 covers the identification of ignition sources when assessing equipment.

Interested to hear what you find out, as no doubt I might get asked again at some point.

JJ Prendergast  
#8 Posted : 24 July 2012 16:54:28(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
JJ Prendergast

I also assume you have got adequate ventilation to help reduce your hazardous area radiue?

BSEN 60079-10 refers for hazardous zone calculations/distances
Mr.Flibble  
#9 Posted : 24 July 2012 17:46:13(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Mr.Flibble

Jane Blunt wrote:
If the showers are indoors, do make sure they specify a suitable floor covering and some means for removing the water.

I was 'blessed' with a number of showers, installed indoors, that discharged directly onto the floor. When I challenged it the installer stated that the Standard did not specify drains (!).


Haa Haa yes came across this one, great fun when testing them!
aland76  
#10 Posted : 25 July 2012 08:59:45(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
aland76

Thanks for your comments JJ Prendergast

I’ll start by saying I am in no way an expert on these matters, I’ve recently (as in 2 months ago) stumbled into the realm of full-time H&S, having previously worked in process (WwTW, AD, Energy from waste, Flash Pyrolysis, etc), so I’m currently on a very steep learning curve!
Regarding ATEX rating, the shower(s) we are looking at are installed with a 240v 50/60Hz single phase feed which supplies an immersion heater and thermostat, which heats a 1200L tank above the shower. This is to meet the 15 minutes tepid water drench time specified by ANSI/ISEA Z358.1-2009, hence where the need for ATEX rating comes from. The companies I have approached so far have offered showers that are “SUITABLE FOR USE IN ZONE 1 AND 2 AREAS, GAS GROUPS 11A AND 11B” and I will expect certification that states as such when I come to order them.

As much as I’d like to place both showers outside of the area (remove the hazard rather than manage it!), the plant is being enclosed with a fence and electronic key system for the gate so this is why I need one shower within the enclosure, and the majority of the plant is classified as zone 1 due to the nature of the process (acid esterification).

Regarding the hazardous zone calculations/distances, this has all been assessed before I started with the company and is something I have had no input / involvement in, however the vast majority of the plant is not enclosed (bunded tank farms) so ventilation is natural rather than mechanical.
I’ll keep you updated if I make any breakthroughs, however it looks like I’m biting the bullet and going with the top spec showers, I think this to be the better route than finding out at court whether the alternatives are ‘suitable and sufficient’!

Alan
aland76  
#11 Posted : 25 July 2012 09:02:15(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
aland76

PH2 wrote:
Hi Alan,
we encountered a similar problem a few years ago. The British Standard for Safety showers for laboratories (BS 15154 -1) stipulates a flow rate of 60l/min. As you know the ANSI standard is 75l/min. The British standard for safety eye was units (BS 15154 -2) is 6l/min. The ANSI standard is 11.5l/min.

We had to specify the ANSI standard at a couple of water treatment works, because of the bulk quantities of acids stored in large tanks there. Some suppliers reps tried to fob us off with kit to the laboratory standard, but we went with the more expensive showers (thankfully they have never been needed). Never had to specify an ATEX compatible unit.

PH2


I'm at the other end of the spectrum, with suppliers pushing ANSI/ISEA Z358.1-2009, makes me wonder just what we are supposed to be working to!

Alan
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.