Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Clark34486  
#1 Posted : 01 August 2012 09:02:00(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Clark34486

I've worked in this industry for over a decade, having spent a good week perusing this chat forum it is obvious to me that 'we' often get embroiled in lengthy references to legislation/ regulation etc. now I have to admit that H&S does indeed 'float my boat' but it's not really about us is it? Why did you as an individual emabark on a career in OH&S? What I do now is concentrate on HOW the people we advise can achieve the aim not WHAT they need to do to achieve it.
Graham Bullough  
#2 Posted : 01 August 2012 09:50:48(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Graham Bullough

Clark You are likely to get various responses to the interesting points you raise. In relation to your opening comments I'll be provocative and venture that this discussion forum is little more than a chat forum (to echo your terminology) and not really representative of people working in OS&H. Though it seems that a fair number of people look at this forum, relatively few of them start threads or post responses. Furthermore, some of us who do so try, like myself, to avoid getting embroiled in detailed discussions about legislation, etc. Also, sometimes I cringe at the content and/or presentation of some things which appear on this forum, especially as it is a public one and technically open to anybody in the world with internet access and who cares or happens to look at it. For this reason I've suggested from time to time and without success that the top of the first page of thread listings should include a disclaimer to advise anyone looking at the forum that postings on it 1) do not necessarily reflect the views of IOSH and its members, and 2) should not be relied upon for making decisions. I recall that the original version of this forum did show such a disclaimer but it disappeared when the forum format was changed several years or so ago.
RayRapp  
#3 Posted : 01 August 2012 10:33:27(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
RayRapp

Clark It is only to be expected that h&s practitioners often discuss h&s legislation because we are guided by it in most that we do. We then apply our own understanding of legislation when we carry out our daily work. Sometimes the law can be nebulous, hence there is often a degree of interpretation involved in the process.
Lawlee45239  
#4 Posted : 01 August 2012 10:57:34(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Lawlee45239

Clark34486 wrote:
I've worked in this industry for over a decade, having spent a good week perusing this chat forum it is obvious to me that 'we' often get embroiled in lengthy references to legislation/ regulation etc. now I have to admit that H&S does indeed 'float my boat' but it's not really about us is it? Why did you as an individual emabark on a career in OH&S? What I do now is concentrate on HOW the people we advise can achieve the aim not WHAT they need to do to achieve it.
Honest answer, by accident, I was in secondary school in Ireland, finished the Irish version of the A levels, and didnt have a clue what to do, I asked my brother for guidance as he was 4 years older and was a bit more in tune with the world than I, he suggest that Safety was the way forward, I therefore enrolled into a 3 year course, and fell in love with the safety world. We done a very varied course and construction was the area I loved most and felt was an area that I could do something in. I like to focus on the guys on site, rather than yards of paperwork (I still do the paperwork cause we have to), but a lot of the construction sector guys are in that area of works becuase they dont like paperwork or offices, and prefer to use their hands.....I try to advise them as best I can, I try to work with them and talk to them rather than at them.
Clark34486  
#5 Posted : 01 August 2012 11:07:56(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Clark34486

Lawlee45239 wrote:
Clark34486 wrote:
I've worked in this industry for over a decade, having spent a good week perusing this chat forum it is obvious to me that 'we' often get embroiled in lengthy references to legislation/ regulation etc. now I have to admit that H&S does indeed 'float my boat' but it's not really about us is it? Why did you as an individual emabark on a career in OH&S? What I do now is concentrate on HOW the people we advise can achieve the aim not WHAT they need to do to achieve it.
Honest answer, by accident, I was in secondary school in Ireland, finished the Irish version of the A levels, and didnt have a clue what to do, I asked my brother for guidance as he was 4 years older and was a bit more in tune with the world than I, he suggest that Safety was the way forward, I therefore enrolled into a 3 year course, and fell in love with the safety world. We done a very varied course and construction was the area I loved most and felt was an area that I could do something in. I like to focus on the guys on site, rather than yards of paperwork (I still do the paperwork cause we have to), but a lot of the construction sector guys are in that area of works becuase they dont like paperwork or offices, and prefer to use their hands.....I try to advise them as best I can, I try to work with them and talk to them rather than at them.
Amen I often think H&S practitioners should look at themselves when they are 'advising', we need the people we work with just as much as they need us
NEE' ONIONS MATE!  
#6 Posted : 01 August 2012 11:33:40(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
NEE' ONIONS MATE!

elements of 'safety' were added to my role 'bit by bit' I'd like to see the day my children can exist in a society where this safety stuff gets lumped together with social responsibility, diversity, behaviour law and order etc and becomes a cultural norm rather than a specific subject. I think clark34486 has the right approach in the current regime we're stuck with.
Lawlee45239  
#7 Posted : 01 August 2012 11:36:00(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Lawlee45239

Clark34486 wrote:
Lawlee45239 wrote:
Clark34486 wrote:
I've worked in this industry for over a decade, having spent a good week perusing this chat forum it is obvious to me that 'we' often get embroiled in lengthy references to legislation/ regulation etc. now I have to admit that H&S does indeed 'float my boat' but it's not really about us is it? Why did you as an individual emabark on a career in OH&S? What I do now is concentrate on HOW the people we advise can achieve the aim not WHAT they need to do to achieve it.
Honest answer, by accident, I was in secondary school in Ireland, finished the Irish version of the A levels, and didnt have a clue what to do, I asked my brother for guidance as he was 4 years older and was a bit more in tune with the world than I, he suggest that Safety was the way forward, I therefore enrolled into a 3 year course, and fell in love with the safety world. We done a very varied course and construction was the area I loved most and felt was an area that I could do something in. I like to focus on the guys on site, rather than yards of paperwork (I still do the paperwork cause we have to), but a lot of the construction sector guys are in that area of works becuase they dont like paperwork or offices, and prefer to use their hands.....I try to advise them as best I can, I try to work with them and talk to them rather than at them.
Amen I often think H&S practitioners should look at themselves when they are 'advising', we need the people we work with just as much as they need us
I dont know a lot, and I like to talk to the guys to better understand how they do their tasks, and how it can be made easier, be it taller benches to reduce bending over etc etc etc. A gas pipe was hit on a site I was on recently, and I asked the gas guys if it were ok to stand over them and watch the repair as I had never seen it being done before, they said it was fine and talked me through the process. I do find a lot of the time that some of the Clients H&S people can be awkward, in that, they will stop the works because it is 'unsafe', they wont offer advise on how to do the task in a way that suits them, nor will they look at the task, see how it has to be done and work from there, I dont carry the safety book around with me all day as if I did no works would be done.
Clark34486  
#8 Posted : 01 August 2012 11:41:15(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Clark34486

'Practicality' in H&S will be the next 'big thing' it'll be the way ahead because legislation will eventually be dumbed down (in my opinion), the current 'elected party' have a passion to reduce legislative 'H&S red tape'. I think many practitioners will get left behind
Jake  
#9 Posted : 01 August 2012 11:42:45(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Jake

I come from a different angle. I wanted to become a Solicitor, but flunked A-Levels so couldn't get into a Law Degree, so fell back on what I liked during work experience, Environmental Health. By the time graduation came around, after a year working for a LA, I knew that I wanted to work in the private sector, so eventually moved into the role which I have been in for 3 years. In some ways I do act as a company "lawyer", getting involved in various aspects of law and dealing with enforcement agencies in a bid to prevent / minimise any business implication, and acting on behalf of the company should anything go wrong (be it H&S or any other regulatory area). I enjoy the nuances of OHS, but much prefer the strategic work setting the organisational policies and procedures and enabling our line managers to manage the on-the-ground issues. Whilst I accept many practitioners turn their noses up at people who don't work on the ground, I wouldn't have it any other way.
NEE' ONIONS MATE!  
#10 Posted : 01 August 2012 11:49:51(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
NEE' ONIONS MATE!

Clark34486 wrote:
'Practicality' in H&S will be the next 'big thing' it'll be the way ahead because legislation will eventually be dumbed down (in my opinion), the current 'elected party' have a passion to reduce legislative 'H&S red tape'. I think many practitioners will get left behind
Spot on. Watch 'safety' red tape get pruned back and simple core values melded into wider societal norms in the next ten years. I cannot wait.
Tigers  
#11 Posted : 01 August 2012 14:07:32(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Tigers

I genuinely want to make a difference, but it is mainly because I would get bored not doing the juggling act: Health and safety managers are having to manage over 30 different priorities during the course of their work, according to research by Aviva Risk Management Solutions (ARMS). ARMS asked 200 health and safety managers about their workplace priorities at the Safety & Health Expo event in Birmingham 2012 and the following 33 issues were highlighted. 1. Accreditation 2. Reduce accidents 3. Zero harm 4. Training 5. Risk assessments 6. Maintain current performance 7. Board involvement 8. Asbestos 9. Environmental 10. Behavioural/cultural 11. Accident investigation 12. Legal compliance 13. Management systems/policy 14. Violence 15. Fire safety 16. Manual handling 17. Work at height 18. Lone workers 19. Home-working 20. Driver/transport safety 21. Stress 22. Health and well-being 23. Slips & trips 24. Display screen equipment 25. Hazardous substances/chemicals 26. Dangerous goods 27. Costs 28. Staffing 29. Near misses 30. Supporting business objectives 31. Noise 32. Dust 33. Improve communication
NEE' ONIONS MATE!  
#12 Posted : 01 August 2012 15:27:45(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
NEE' ONIONS MATE!

That lot is the management teams responsibility. If you're 'juggling' it, you may have to rethink your own priorities.
DP  
#13 Posted : 01 August 2012 16:03:01(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
DP

Like most people of a certain age I drifted into it because I had (well some) of the necessary knowledge required at the time - I had worked in heavy industry for years (steel) and had an reasonable knowledge - in the 90's we saw the fist real appetite for safety - I was by then working in the NHS and got roped in to it and it went from there.
Clairel  
#14 Posted : 01 August 2012 16:48:30(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Clairel

Got into H&S because I needed work and applied to a job advert I knew nothing about and somehow got through all the interview processes and ended up as HM Inspector. I knew nothing about H&S prior to that and most of the time I still wish I knew nothing about H&S and had never accepted the job. I'm nothing if not honest!!! However, I'm a great believer in doing a job to the best of my abilities, so I am diligent even though I can't cope with the subject matter most of the time. Best part of my job is variety, flexibility and the people I deal with. As to how I do it - I tell them what they need to do AND how to achieve it. More importantly I don't go OTT and I try to be 'real' about what I advise them to do. That to me is the biggest cause for debate on this forum. Those like me who are pragmatists and those who are risk averse. We'll never meet in the middle.
Holbrook42275  
#15 Posted : 01 August 2012 16:55:04(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Holbrook42275

I was a Union Safety Rep with the TGWU and was fortunate to be selected to be one of the first delegates on their NEBOSH general cert. After that and a lot of luck (and some hard work) I found my first professional position and fortunately have never looked back. Like some of the other posters here the general diversity of work and the people I work with and for make it the job it is.
Holbrook42275  
#16 Posted : 01 August 2012 16:57:18(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Holbrook42275

I also forgot to mention that I agree with some of the other posters regarding being pragmatic and practical. This is the reason we got away from prescriptive legislation after all.
smitch  
#17 Posted : 01 August 2012 17:03:36(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
smitch

Many, many years in the engineering/manufacturing field, so I had a reasonable understanding of many of common hazards/risks in that line of work. Then became foremen in a company with a fair sized workshop (30-40 machine operatives); so as part of my training undertook NEBOSH NGC, was then more qualified than the company HR manager who at that time also oversaw H&S matters; so got asked (or was it roped into) assisting him. Some years later HR manager wished to leave and after discussion with MD and other Directors it was decided to split the HR & H&S role into two jobs; I was asked if I’d be interested in H&S role. I asked for additional training if I took on this role; company agreed and sponsored me undertaking the old two-part diploma, passed part one, but not enough time to get onto part 2 before this route closed (to new single part Diploma). Been in same role now for the last seven-years; mind you, the role has expanded a great deal over that time; you know what I mean it’s often (or is it always) a matter of “oh give that to H&S to deal with” along with the justification (spin) that if you look hard enough or dig deep enough, then its somehow related to some form of health, safety, welfare or environmental matter, if not that then it represents some other form of business risk. Not that this is all bad, makes the job very interesting at times (figuring out which hat I should be wearing :-), sometimes I even get to get to wear a few different ones at the same time). That said there is most certainly never a dull moment because I never know what’s going to come up next. Plus I have had the opportunity to undertake lots of other types of training (as well as additional H&S/environmental stuff) and I see this as no bad thing, because you never know what’s around the corner and it provides plenty of options to include on the old CV should one desire or need to move on.
Lisa Boulton  
#18 Posted : 01 August 2012 17:26:29(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Lisa Boulton

My reasons sound similar to ClaireL. I didn't wake up one day and think 'I want to work in OHS' I was on a career break looking afters the kids and we extended the house, husband suggests that we need to pay for said extension and gainful employment may be a way forward. Had worked in a specific career before hand that I didn't want to return to so thought I was unemployable. I had taken the IOSH managing safely cert just prior to career break and saw a job advertised for H&S Officer with this as minimum qualification. Applied for said job and 'upset' when I was successful as meant returning to a 'proper job'! Had a brilliant boss who believed strongly in career development and put me through NGC and then diploma. He was an excellent mentor and very sad when he retired two years ago. But now love H&S, try to not make things too onerous for everyone who have jobs to do and love looking at what I call my 'nerdy' H&S discussion forums (no offence meant!)
chris42  
#19 Posted : 01 August 2012 17:52:02(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
chris42

I think I was a very bad person in a previous life. On a more serious note, I put a management system in for Quality and the company wanted that extended to H&S and Env. So did the NEBOSH Cert & Diploma, became the HSE & QA Manager and found the variety in the job rewarding and more interesting than I would have first thought. I feel the lengthy debates on legislation actually interesting, but find it a shame that nothing ever gets resolved by them, one way or another. We have to work within the wording of quite a lot of legislation, sometimes with poor or no proper guidance, so discussion is inevitable. I find it a little odd that other professions also have to work within legislation, but don’t seem to be criticised for discussing it (outsiders view). I agree the main place for discussion is amongst ourselves (this forum?) not our own Company's or Clients, but that does not make doing so evil. People on this forum for example often want to know what legislation / guidance there is on a topic, so they can read it for themselves and make their own mind up, does a little debate that then follows hurt anyone. I used to work for an engineering company, who actively wanted to know the wording in legislation and guidance, so we could all collectively work together to find solutions to issues, whether H&S, HR or anything else. I’m sure other organisations don’t want this information which is fine. You meter out the information at the level you feel the people you are speaking to want, in the same way you change your language to suit your audience.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.