Rank: Super forum user
|
Now that it has been established (WHO) that diesel exhaust fumes are cancer causing, it reminded me of a post ages ago when I/we suggested that theses trucks should be replaced is used within enclosed factories.
I/we suggested that an RA be made etc. and replacement electrical one used.
I wonder is anyone can recall what the outcome was. I've tried the search engine but nothing!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
It raises some interesting issues for me, as i work in the rail industry and we have a lot of very dirty diesle engines that run in sheds with poor ventilation. This means a much more rigerious RA for when i send guys to sites.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
zimmy wrote:Now that it has been established (WHO) that diesel exhaust fumes are cancer causing, it reminded me of a post ages ago when I/we suggested that theses trucks should be replaced is used within enclosed factories.
I/we suggested that an RA be made etc. and replacement electrical one used.
I wonder is anyone can recall what the outcome was. I've tried the search engine but nothing! Do you have more infomation on this? a report or something.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
zimmy wrote:http://www.safesurveys.info/EmailVision/EmailVision/documents/Dieselandcancer_JohnCherie.pdf
This is the file I have,saves an email
Thanks very much it's really appreciated.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
We had a situation a few years ago in a previous place I worked where 2 diesel FLT's were used in a large warehouse with 2 large shutter doors at the end. We had a Foreman, who's office was a unit within the warehouse, who was absent from work with frequent chest infections. He cited the reason was the dust build up.
After 2 years of pushing managers, I finally had the dust analysed and had air monitors installed and it showed large quantities of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH's) as well as small quantities of "heavy metals" as a result of the burn off from the FLT's. Each time the warehouse doors were opened, the dust was unsettled, making it airborne.
Many years of working in that environment was a contributor to either sensitisation or occupational asthma - still not known which as I moved organisations before it was settled.
Interestingly enough, the Occupational Health provider stated that the best case scenerio would be Occupational Asthma as the person could be removed from the work environment, thus the trigger, without any further complications that any other asthmatic could encounter. However, sensitisation to PAH's could be the start point of many future triggers of non work related health problems.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
For us poor electricians, and the like, it was the asbestos that has been proven to take us old-boys out. I get the feeling that rockwool etc will be the next big hitter.
If one thinks about it, and not too hard at that, if something don't belong in the body it may not be doing us any favors.
Bowel cancer springs into my little brain regarding the processed food we gulp down. Just happy thought. And of course the runoff from the bowel goes to the liver...
back to powerpoint
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
I quite like the smell of diesel fumes. Why does everything I enjoy have to be bad for me?!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Key EU limit-values for air quality include PM10 i.e. Particulate Matter less than 10 micrometres (10µm) diameter 24 hour mean 50µg m-3 not to be exceeded more than 35 times a year PM10 Annual mean 40µg m-3 Nitrogen Dioxide NO2 1 hour mean 200µg m-3 not to be exceeded more than 18 times a year NO2 Annual mean 40µg m-3 Both are particularly relevant to diesel exhaust emissions which contain numerous contaminants with nitrogen dioxide selected as a general indicator of overall air quality. However, the problem should reduce as diesel vehicles are replaced. The World Health Organisation reclassification of diesel exhaust as carcinogenic to humans was based on sufficient evidence that exposure is associated with an increased risk of lung cancer. See http://press.iarc.fr/pr213_E.pdf.
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.