IOSH forums home
»
Our public forums
»
OSH discussion forum
»
Roof works - Changes to working practices re: silica dust
Rank: Forum user
|
Some 12 months ago the HSE issued some guidance which basically allowed roofing contractors whom needed to cut tiles in situ on roof valleys to "dry cut" in these areas where necessary as long as the operatives affected where wearing the appropriate RPE.
I have just now recieved a document from one of our roofing contractors relating to the changes to working practices when cutting tiles etc in the roof valleys which states that from the 1st of october 2012 the above will no longer be permitted, and that all cutting must be undertaken away from the roof area using a sacrificial board, dust suppression and RPE.
I have taken a look on the HSE website for information relating to this matter and cannot find any information relating to these new requirements. The information forwarded to me has come from the NFRC.
Does anyone have any further information or comments on this matter.
regards
Allan
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Thanks Alan
However, that document/guidance is from 2010.
I am looking for something more recent (within the last few months).
There is a document on the NFRC website but there is a problem currently with the page and i cannot download the document.
Allan
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Alan, I received the same communication.
Here is the link top the NFRC site
http://www.nfrc.co.uk/nf...a-461c-b972-d60c48bd274c
but, as you have noted, the Download link for more info doesn't work.
I feel it is really not useful for NFRC to issue a bulletin like this before any official notification/bulletiun has come from the HSE.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I wonder why you need a document to tell you to improve safety when you have a contractor who is aready doing just that?
I would never allow dry cutting that may produce silica dust.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Firesafety101 wrote:I wonder why you need a document to tell you to improve safety when you have a contractor who is aready doing just that?
I would never allow dry cutting that may produce silica dust.
It's the type at valleys on a roof that roofers say they have to dry cut in situ. Having a water feed presents new risks to their H&S in that type of environment.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Having browsed Marley's web site, http://www.marleyeternit...les%20and%20Slates.ashx, they state it is advisable to the cut the valley tile away from the installation area to prevent contact with the valley material which is what most roofing contractors do.
Water suppression in the cutting area may be OK on new build but not refurbs where there is a potential for the contaminated water to enter internally via the eaves.
Usually the correct sequence in my opinion is to:
1. Mark the line where the tile is to be cut
2. Pass the marked tile to an assistant with the cutting apparatus
3. Cut the tile on a stable platform with water suppresion and RPE whilst on the platform
4. Whilst the tile is being cut, the installer returns to the instalation area and prepares the next tile to be cut
5. Down the roof via a cat ladder to the assistant cutting tiles thus avoiding breaking newly cut fragile valley tiles
6. Swap the newly marked tile for the cut tile
7. So on an so forth
The roofing contractor should present a method statement outling the above before any work commences.
However don't take the above as concrete(excuse the pun) as there really is no prescribed method of carrying out the above task. Its all about having a common sense approach to enable the task to be reduced as low as reasonably practicable.
Regards,
Damian
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Thanks.
The point I was making, in my post above, was that it's not a good idea for NFRC to issue THEIR guidance before official HSE guidance. They run the risk of having to amend it if .......
JohnW
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
The guidance has been agreed with the HSE according to the NRFC.
From my experience with certain roofing contractors I expect the HSE to issue quite a few notices relating to this matter, especially with the FFI coming into effect on the same date!
Allan
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Its going to be a nice cash cow for the HSE when the FFI is introduced as valleys aren't the only place where tiles need to be cut. Roof tilers also encounter`hips, roof lights, soil vent pipes,chimney's, verges, raking land valleys not to mention cutting groves to abutments where lead step flashings need to be tucked in.
Furthermore I know its rare in this country but what about hosepipe bans when thay materialise!!!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
allanwood wrote: The guidance has been agreed with the HSE according to the NRFC.
From my experience with certain roofing contractors I expect the HSE to issue quite a few notices relating to this matter, especially with the FFI coming into effect on the same date!
So, 1st of October has gone, and I haven't seen any fresh guidance from HSE.
and the page referred to by ahoskins now has an Error 404.
As I said earlier, it's odd that the NRFC issues a bulletin, in AUGUST, before the HSE, and now in October still nothing from the HSE.
This is what NRFC sent to my client in August (and then there was an amendment to their attachment in September.....)
NRFC wrote: IMPORTANT: New H&S Guidance Document - Controlling Silica by NFRC | Aug 09, 2012
Please find below the latest Health & Safety Guidance document ‘Controlling Silica when disc cutting roof tiles’.
We are aware that some members have been contacted by builders, stating that the Health & Safety Executive (HSE) will enforce full wet cutting of all roof tiles from 1st September; this date is incorrect. This matter has been brought to HSE’s attention who have confirmed that the correct enforcement date is the 1st October 2012.
From this date, HSE will be expecting roofing contractors to follow the guidance contained within this guidance document or face a prohibition notice.
HSE have stated that they value the partnership with NFRC, and have appreciated the role we have played with regards to this issue. The new guidance note is an NFRC document which has been formulated in conjunction with HSE, with support from NHBC, the HBF, Associate Members, Roof Training Groups, and others within the house building industry.
The change to full wet cutting is a major shift in industry practices and we strongly recommend that this document is read and passed onto the necessary people within your company.
N.B. An official statement from HSE will be released in due course via a press release, and will be obtainable from the website.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Hi > There is referece to your post in the new HSG33 published by the HSE this year
Silica
268 Silica is found in many types of stone and in concrete, including roof tiles. In dust form it will be released during cutting or grinding. Inhaling silica dust can lead to serious disease, including lung cancer and more than 500 workers die each year from silica-related diseases.
269 Even short periods of roof tile cutting can create high levels of silica dust. Where possible, cutting should be eliminated by using ½ or 1½ size tiles. Where resizing is needed, use water to stop the dust getting into the air. Modern cut-off saws have an attachment for a water hose.
270 Cutting should not be undertaken on the roof but on an area of the surrounding scaffolding set up for this purpose. Where practical this also applies to valleys. For example, GRP valley systems with a central ‘ridge’ enable valley tiles to be first marked against this ridge and then taken down onto the scaffolding for cutting.
271 When using such a cutting area it is vital that the safety of the scaffold boards is not affected. A suitable piece of sacrificial material should be placed between the tile and scaffold boards to prevent the boards being accidentally cut. The water jets of the cut-off saw and water container need to be inspected and maintained regularly to keep them in working order.
272 Even with water suppression some silica dust will still remain in the air and a mask should also be worn. Nuisance-grade dust masks do not protect the lungs. Use either a FFP3 disposable mask or a half mask with P3 filters. Wearers must be face fit tested to make sure the mask works correctly.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
|
|
|
|
IOSH forums home
»
Our public forums
»
OSH discussion forum
»
Roof works - Changes to working practices re: silica dust
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.