Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Eddy  
#1 Posted : 26 October 2012 15:20:30(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Eddy

Folks

I am in the process of revising and updating my heallth and safety at work policy manual i.e. organisational structure, responsibilities and arrangements. We are multi site organisation who are in the business of transport and engineering. I want my manual to cover all. Can anyone advise me what is the best way to go about this process from the writng of it to cover all sites, selling it to directors and then throughout the workforce.

I want to hold all levels of management responsibile and make them aware of this responsibility. I would like to asign specific responsibilities. Does anyone have a list of responsibilities for managing director, directors, managers, supervisors and employees. Even specific responsibilities for eg purchasing i.e. COSHH ETC. Would anyone like to share their structure i.e. were policies and procedures fit in within the manual. Any help be appreciated. Eddie eddie@bpmckeefry.com
Zimmy  
#2 Posted : 26 October 2012 15:43:55(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Zimmy

That is a big ask Eddy.

The answer will take some time to compile.
teh_boy  
#3 Posted : 26 October 2012 15:51:54(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
teh_boy

Why not do what I did

Get an organogram, decide on key levels using a committee meeting and include a board member / HR function - as believe me the politics in this can quickly become fun.... that's not my job, will be said a lot :)

next - write down what they are doing
then - what they should be doing + identify gaps

This will make it VERY specific to your organisation, and that will result in a policy that reflects your own procedures and responsibilities, the work involved in doing this will also help to identify culture issues and informal reporting lines etc etc which will be amazingly useful
Ron Hunter  
#4 Posted : 26 October 2012 16:59:34(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ron Hunter

Have a look at the IOD/HSE leadership model INDG417 and some of the other resources available via this very Site.
Plenty of food for thought there.
User is suspended until 03/02/2041 16:40:57(UTC) Ian.Blenkharn  
#5 Posted : 26 October 2012 17:35:10(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ian.Blenkharn

Eddy wrote:
.... I want my manual to cover all. ..... I want to hold all levels of management responsibile and make them aware of this responsibility. I would like to asign specific responsibilities.



Try to include some idea of what part you will play, apart from simply dumping responsibility on everyone else.

You work there too! Think about making yourself part of the team
sadlass  
#6 Posted : 27 October 2012 09:30:17(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
sadlass

Eddy: some good advice from teh_boy. It's not really 'your safety policy' is it? Neither is it for the safety adviser to tell others what their job is, which is how such policies come across.

Everyone has (or should have) some kind of job description.
H&S accountabilities are so often not included - I mean proper ones, such as 'carry out a monthly safety tour', not the bland all-inclusive 'comply with H&S requirements' which is fairly meaningless.

You need the HR and operational management to take this on, otherwise it will, frankly, be ignored, however comprehensive you draft responsibilities. The policy should only be broad brush, in levels of responsibility, but then made specific through the organisational JDs.

If it's not in someone's job, they won't / can't be made accountable. If they aren't accountable, it's not important (to them or their manager). If it's not important it won't get done.

I think we all fall down a bit on the way this has tended to be approached: the safety policy should not be a separate supplement to peoples' job roles. Everything they need to know about their job responsibilities should be evident in their JD.

There is quite a bit to this project, to tie up the broad brush 'policy' layers with practical real accountabilities, which can be and should be part of a performance management system. I have rarely seen it done, only in my dreams . .

Maybe if you do it successfully you can share in some way.
Eddy  
#7 Posted : 27 October 2012 19:38:04(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Eddy

Thanks for reply everyone
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.