Rank: Forum user
|
Quick question I was hoping someone should help me with. If a company purchases a piece of equipment that is to be used in an potential explosive atmosphere, is it enough that the equipment as a whole is provided with a protection certificate rather than each individual atex rated pump/valve etc?
It was my understanding, and I admit I could well be wrong, is that each component should be supplied with its own certificate but the manufacturer are saying that because we purchased the equipment preassembled the one certificate is enough as its certificated as if it was the sum of its parts. Their explanation does make sense but I'd just like verification for my own piece of mind.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
In my experience of this the WHOLE assembly, component, machine or whatever it is , is covered by the test and certificate.
Indeed if any one part is removed or changed then the whole thing has to be tested and re-certified.
The manufacturer is correct.
Think of it this way... a battery by itself could not be intrinsically safe, but it WOULD if it was contained within a sealed container.
Therefore the whole assembly has to be tested.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
roshqse wrote:
Think of it this way... a battery by itself could not be intrinsically safe, but it WOULD if it was contained within a sealed container.
Therefore the whole assembly has to be tested.
A very clear and easily understandable example roshqse. Cheers.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
You have to watch with haz areas.
You can buy a piece of kit with all the certs, however, the cable gland for example has to be appropriate for the cable and the zone in which its placed.
Make sure any spark wiring it up has a compex certificate and has sufficient insurance to work in the field of work.
Is there a dsear report for the site?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
That was going to be the lead of my next question. The site has an existing area classification and DSEAR assessment, zoning etc for its existing storage facilities but are adding a new process to the existing functions. Does this new process require a verification before first use by a competent person or can it just be included as part of the existing asessment?
The DSEAR Regs state that "Before a workplace containing places classified as hazardous pursuant to paragraph 1 is used for the first time, the employer shall ensure that its overall explosion safety is verified by a person who is competent...."
Obviously the site has ongoing operations that are covered already and this is a new process on the site. So whilst the workplace as a whole isn't coming in to use for the first time, this particular part of the process is and so wondering if the 'part of a workplace' is applicable.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
The new process can affect the existing,so i willhave do be redone.
What type of industry areyou in/ location?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Printing with solvent based inks.
The item in question is a small solvent recovery planet which will be installed next to a solvent storage tank farm in an external location.
New installs is not an area of DSEAR that I deal with on a daily basis.
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.