Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Rick Warner  
#1 Posted : 27 October 2012 19:28:01(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Rick Warner

Good evening ladies and gents. My daughter recently moved into a council house, her husband is a builder and wanted to make changes, the local council depicted that they had no problems with these changes, after some home improvements my son in law asked me to visit his house, because he thought that he had asbestos containing materials here in. i demanded that the local council carry out an asbestos survey, this survey was carried out and it transpires that there are Amosite and Crocitiyle based materials within the loft space, AIB panels within the bathroom and asbestos containing textured coatings on all ceilings, my son in law has disturbed most of these asbestos containing materials, and my grandchildren have been inthe house, the local authority/landlord has said that they are not going to remove the asbestos and that he should not disturb it, Firstly, should he have not been issued an asbestos survey and secondly, being as we are all aware that this asbestos is now present, should they not arrange for the removal of same!???????????????????
Zimmy  
#2 Posted : 28 October 2012 15:18:37(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Zimmy

As I understand it:

1) The council gave the ok for the work to be carried in one of its properties.

Was the council aware of similar buildings/dwellings in the same area containing asbestos? Is so they should/could have informed you (just my opinion as don't have data on this)

The son-in-law did not ask the council for information regarding asbestos within the building prior to the work starting. As a builder he should have been well aware of such hazards If not, why not? It seems that he has put people at risk here. Perhaps he's not a builder but an 'odd-job-man. No offence intended here but it does seem odd that he was unaware of the situation regarding building material.

Regarding removal. If the panels are left undisturbed then no problem. However, I would think that if son-in-law wants to remove them for alteration I don't see how the council should be asked to foot the bill.

Just a point of view.

bod212  
#3 Posted : 29 October 2012 08:01:18(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
bod212

There is no specific duty to administer an asbestos survey other than in common parts of domestic premises, however, this does not absolve an LA of managing the asbestos in one of their properties. From your description there seems to be asbestos in differing locations and forms within the house. This should have been picked up by an LA. Why not? People get confused with 'asbestos surveys' and 'asbestos management plans'. They are two different things altogether. The survey is done and then informs the management plan. From what you describe it sounds like the LA have carried out an after the event survey. This survey should have been carried out much sooner. The second part of your question asks about getting it removed. Well no, it depends on the condition amongst other things. If the LA appointed a competent surveyor and they are saying don't touch it, well don't. That might be the recommendations in the ongoing management plan. You are, however, right to be wary of the LA but removing it might not be the simple answer. Being cynical, the LA are probably looking at the cost first though. And how many other homes in their remit might be subject to removal costs?
Clairel  
#4 Posted : 29 October 2012 09:06:28(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Clairel

Rick Warner wrote:
Firstly, should he have not been issued an asbestos survey and secondly, being as we are all aware that this asbestos is now present, should they not arrange for the removal of same!???????????????????


Firstly the asbestos regs do not apply to domestic premises.

Secondly removal of asbestos can create more risk than leaving it in situ if it is low grade asbestos in good condition in locations where it unlikely to become damaged.

May I suggest you go and read up on asbestos (the HSE website has plenty of information) instead of panicing unecessarily just because someone mentions the A word.
Psycho  
#5 Posted : 29 October 2012 11:41:03(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Psycho

Rick Warner wrote:
her husband is a builder and wanted to make changes,
that there are Amosite and Crocitiyle based materials within the loft space,
my son in law has disturbed most of these asbestos containing materials,
my grandchildren have been inthe house, ?


crocidolite is the most hazardous type we used to use it in the dockyards and alot of my old friends are no longer due to it i would be very conserned as to why your son in law moved it and allowed the child=ren to stay in the house


walker  
#6 Posted : 29 October 2012 12:04:45(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
walker

I'm amazed there is actually anyone in the UK building trade who has such a poor awareness of asbestos.

Many disregard it for a easy buck, but that can't be the case here as his own kids are involved.
boblewis  
#7 Posted : 29 October 2012 12:06:38(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
boblewis

I am struggling to understand this as I am well aware that the vaste number of Housing Authorities, both local and housing associations, are aware of the issues in their various properties. Whilst not precise to a house number the information is general to house types and ares at least. The assurance for work thus seems a bit unusual unless of course they realised that the work would not affect the ACMs present. Such bodies do need to have the information as they do employ maintenance staff to undertake work in the premises at which point the regulations DO apply.

Crocidolite in cementitious products is not unusual in some areas, particularly near major ports for some reason, having been used in flue pipes and rainwater goods in significant amounts. Having said that there are various cladding panels and corrugated sheeting that have been used also with crocidolite.

Your son-in-law has taken a fairly typical builders approach - knock it out and then decide what it might be. If he does this at work then he is going to come under the HSE view at some point. ALL structures including domestic housing built before 2000 may have ACMs in the fabric and so you need to be aware.

Forget about the textured coating - it is very difficult to get elevated dust levels when working on this unless you use an orbital sander!!! As for the rest - you now know where it is so avoid damage and disturbance of the materialand there can be no problems. I would paint it to A) Seal the surface, B) Remind you where it is, and this prevents further dust issues being possible.

As for the housing authority you cannot force removal and as other have said this can create even bigger problems. I would be tempted however to try and get them to vacuum clean up the loft before you paint the material. They do have some responsibility as they gave approval for work when they should have had reasonable suspicions of ACM presence due to its age.

Bob
Ron Hunter  
#8 Posted : 29 October 2012 13:08:42(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ron Hunter

Most LAs should (emphasis on should) by this time have conducted a sample (%) analysis of Housing Stock on the basis that sooner or later, these dwellings will be the workplace of the various trades they send in to effect repair or improvement. Not 100% failsafe, and the LA has to ensure that work is properly planned on the basis of information it has, and ensure all trades have sufficient and relevant CAR Reg10 asbestos awareness training.
For more involved Stock Improvement Programs, more intrusive survey work will be required, perhaps even refurb./demolition survey. This tends to be programmed in advance of work but can be a very tricky operation in occupied premises.
Ideally, the LA should be passing on what information it has, along with a general note about asbestos, to all new Tenants (usually in Tenancy Agreement Papers).
LA not blameless here in this scenario as described. And in 2012, any self-respecting builder should be asking for all of that information before doing the work.
smith6720  
#9 Posted : 29 October 2012 15:00:56(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
smith6720

I think there is some post/comments on here that may be incorrect, in my opinion: whilst at first glance it is easy to read the Control of Asbestos regulations and assume that there is no requirement to manage asbestos in leased or rented residential properties, this assumption is incorrect. Landlords who derive income from any property, regardless of use, have a responsibility to manage asbestos in their properties. In the case of a landlord (LA) who derives income from a property, the HSE would expect a responsible approach to asbestos management of 'an equivalent standard to the nearest framework'. In the case of asbestos this would be the Control of Asbestos Regulations, and as such, the requirement for survey AND management plan exists. Section 3(3) of HSAWA, may also be relevent, just my thoughts.

In relation to the son in law should have known better, there is a lot of presumtion on this, as we do not know the full facts and his expeirence as a builder etc etc.


boblewis  
#10 Posted : 29 October 2012 17:02:49(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
boblewis

Smith6720

I think you are being too strong in your assertion of a landlords duty under CAR but I do agree with the section 3 reference. It is a shame that the HSE have drawn back from many situations where section 3 could be used but is not. It worked well for YTS but now has fallen of the field of view.

Bob
smith6720  
#11 Posted : 29 October 2012 17:26:17(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
smith6720


Bob > In regards being too strong towards landlords:

Maybe!! in certain circumstance's, but in this case of local authority housing, I dont thinks so, as I would expect them to have managed their property to a higher standard: when was the property built? pre-1999 you would expect them to have realised, that there would be strong possibility of asbestos present, then the management could have kicked in, i.e. remove, encapsulate, record findings on house file. when the house becomes vacant, landlord agent/manager hands the house over to new occupants. During this process they Go through the house file and inform of where and what is present. Again.. Bob just my thoughts??
paul reynolds  
#12 Posted : 30 October 2012 16:12:07(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
paul reynolds

I personally find that the LA do have a management plan in place and this usually defaults to " carry out a suitable and sufficient survey" for the works to be carried out, this unfortunately normally falls on the PC to carry out on their behalf as they seem not to be able to deal or manage this part and so end up with surveys which they do not know what to do with or update their management plan with the latest information.

Regards

PaulR
Olga777  
#13 Posted : 30 October 2012 23:29:34(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
Olga777

Son in law should have been notified by Housing Association of materials containing asbestos prior to giving permission for improvements, all plans of the house and potentially hazardous materials house made of should be kept in H&S policy of construction of this building/s for further safe maintenance and alternations....
frankc  
#14 Posted : 31 October 2012 08:56:38(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
frankc

I live in an ex council house built in 1961. As a gambling man, i don't only assume there could be asbestos somewhere in my home, i'd put money on it.
Seeing as the regs only apply to non domestic properties, who has the responsibility for the duty of care to any workman who has to go into the same type of property to mine which is rented, to do maintenance work or alterations?
The Housing Association that own them?
The company paid to carry out the work?

Thanks in advance to the usual people who try and answer a request for advice.
smith6720  
#15 Posted : 31 October 2012 09:44:48(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
smith6720

Frank

I dont know your background/occupation. So I will have a go at this
1. As stated in my previous post above (9) I believe the Housing Ass who own the house and make money from their rental have a duty of care somewhere along the line, CAR,HSAW, and would be expected to have some kind of management plan in place.

2. The company who the HA employs to complete any work, also would have to ensure that their men are asbestos awareness trained and again I believe should be asking the relevent questions.
3. Where it becomes difficult, is when its the homeowner who employs 1 man outfit to complete some work at their property.
This opens up a whole new world
Bruce Sutherland  
#16 Posted : 31 October 2012 10:21:31(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Bruce Sutherland

Hi Frank - yours is the easier of the two issues

The owner of the house - ie Landlord is at work and therefore HSW applies - so under S3 as a minimum there is a duty - CDM will apply as maintenance is construction work and so there is more detail in there about information the client has to provide ie where is the asbestos - Reg 4 CAR may not apply in terms of DTM other than if the work is in a common area but that is irrelevant because of the first two and Reg 5 of CAR - "need to know what things are before you work on them" _will apply to employer or self employed person - whose easiest way to discharge the duty is to ask the client who has a duty to tell them under CDM.

Rick's is much naughtier and more complicated IMHO and the issues have been explored - legals lines are perhaps HSW S3 re information in criminal terms with a civil line on negligence

But that doesn't actaully remove or identify whether there is any contamination. Be very careful if you go down the is it contaminated route as it easy to say yes and create a large bill ( no risk to a consultant or contractor) and far harder to take an objective look and review the evidence or even gather evidence and take a decision that throwing everything away is not necessary

Kind regards

Bruce

Canopener  
#17 Posted : 31 October 2012 10:23:15(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Canopener

I work for an LA and we started surveys and management plans many years ago, with the housing stock subsequently transferred to a Housing Association.

However, am I the only one to be disappointed that the HSE hasn't knocked this one on the head by adding a further example of 'rented accommodation' of similar to their chart at

http://www.hse.gov.uk/asbestos/campaign/chart.htm

Mind you, the chart says that individual dwellings, tied cottages, private rooms in otherwise shared accommodation are classed as domestic, so you might reasonably assume that the Council house or other similar rented property is also domestic and therefore not covered under the duty to manage under CAR.
boblewis  
#18 Posted : 31 October 2012 11:20:52(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
boblewis

Canopener

Fine until someone is sent in to work the regs then apply to the workplace.

Bob
Canopener  
#19 Posted : 31 October 2012 11:32:43(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Canopener

Yes, and I am not disagreeing with that as you might conclude from the fact that I said that we had previously carried out the surveys and had management plans when we had the housing stock!
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.