Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
BJC  
#1 Posted : 01 November 2012 14:54:07(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Guest

From January Gas Safe will be placing a considerable amount of private homeowners gas boilers at risk even though they were legally fitted before the 2010 Building Regulations. This will cause misery to many vulnerable people already pushed to the edge by fuel prices. My points are 1 Building Regulations are not retrospective. 2 Enforcement under GSUIR should be against the fitters not private domestic property owners. 3 The GSUIR appears to allow for a Risk Based approach. Perhaps an O2 test or similar would be sufficient. 4 The outcome of such a legal interpretation should not increase ill health via hypothermia. Your comments are appreciated.
Ron Hunter  
#2 Posted : 01 November 2012 15:52:42(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ron Hunter

Sorry BJC - I'm not following you here. Do you mean 'replacing homeowner's boilers'? When or in what circumstance does this specific "at risk" issue arise?
BJC  
#3 Posted : 01 November 2012 16:38:21(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Guest

Basically any boiler which cannot have the flue fully inspected will not be worked upon by Gas Safety engineers effectively forcing members of the public to fork out a considerable amount of money to install inspection hatches in walls of their domerstic dwellings. Most of these boilers were correctly fitted at the time but clearly things move along eg improved insulation etc You will not be able to get your boiler serviced is the alternative which I suspect will create greater risks of CO hazards and non licensed gas engineers.
Andrew Ramsey  
#4 Posted : 01 November 2012 16:57:44(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Andrew Ramsey

Gas Safe Register FAQ http://www.gassaferegist...tly_asked_questions.aspx Advice seems to suggest that you can continue to get your boiler serviced.. "What if I don’t have inspection hatches fitted? From 1January 2013 gas engineers can continue to work on your boiler but should advise you that it is “At Risk” and will ask your permission to turn it off, to ensure they comply with industry guidance. If you choose not to fit inspection hatches, you should however continue to have your boiler maintained every year by a Gas Safe registered engineer." ..but this in itself would seem to muddy the waters even further. Instead of the overall advice being clear, it would suggest two alternatives. A - You must comply or shut your boiler down. B - You can comply if you want, if you dont you can still use your boiler as long as it is serviced by a registered engineer. Again, this is just my opinion of the advice on the link above, haven't checked the HSEs yet, that may be more concise.
ajb  
#5 Posted : 01 November 2012 17:14:26(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
ajb

The link to the HSEs information on this is www.hse.gov.uk/safetybulletins/fluesinvoids.htm
BJC  
#6 Posted : 01 November 2012 17:52:45(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Guest

This is beginning to cause chaos and if Building Regulations were retrospective half the properties in the UK would have to be rebuilt.
TopTrainer  
#7 Posted : 01 November 2012 18:11:33(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
TopTrainer

I must be being dim here. I have an old boiler within the terms of age but it has a balanced flue on the outside wall of the house. Where exactly does the inspection panel apply to?
jfw  
#8 Posted : 01 November 2012 22:52:57(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
jfw

I received a letter from the builders of my house a couple of months ago concerning this. (House was built in 2001). They asked me to confirm how many gas appliances I had in the house and how many rooms,(including the loft), did a flue pass through. In return they supplied me with 3 brand new Honeywell CO monitors, one for each room with a gas appliance :- - living room with gas fire - kitchen with gas hob - garage with gas boiler The original letter made reference to flues which pass through rooms or voids would require an inspection hatch. Fortunately I do not have any of these, as both the fire and boiler are mounted on external walls. However a number of neighbours have Powermax units which are installed in the airing cupboard a long way from external walls. The Powermax units have been installed with a flue that runs vertically up through the airing cupboard and loft and out through a vent in the ridge tiles. From memory the letter implied that if the flue could be inspected in both the airing cupboard and loft, no further action should be required, but if its path went through any voids, the voids would require an inspection hatch to be fitted so that it could be inspected in the void. I believe the real concern is where a flue has a long path through a void, such as a ceiling that inspection hatches will have to be fitted to comply. There was a helpline number, but as I was not affected I was just happy enough to accept the 3 free CO monitors.
TopTrainer  
#9 Posted : 01 November 2012 23:01:00(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
TopTrainer

Thank you for your clarification. Seems that the newer builds are the areas where this is going to apply.
johnmurray  
#10 Posted : 02 November 2012 07:02:43(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
johnmurray

BJC  
#11 Posted : 02 November 2012 09:22:42(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Guest

Exactly John thats the message that Gas Safety are putting out. CO monitors are only also acceptable up until the end of 2012 according to them. They feel the HSE can make private householders assume the burden of the GSIUR which I dont feel they legally can.
NickH  
#12 Posted : 02 November 2012 09:39:47(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
NickH

This could pose a problem not only to private homeowners, but also to 'private let' tenants. Up until last year, I rented a flat in a purpose built block, where the gas boiler was in the kitchen (which had no external walls at all). The flue ran for approximately 30 - 40 feet through a boxed in void (along the living room ceiling/ wall) to reach an outside wall where it could vent. I did mention the incoming regulations to the Letting Agent at the time (who was also the block manager). He simply shrugged his shoulders and said the decision as to whether to install inspection hatches or not would be down to the Landlord... When you factor in multiple LL's/ owners in this block alone (somewhere in the region of 30 flats); the total cost of these works would be no inconsiderable sum. When you also factor in that around half of the tenants were foreign nationals working for or around minimum wage, with limited options as to whether they stay or find an alternative home; the potential 'vulnerability' factor does seem to be relatively high.
BJC  
#13 Posted : 02 November 2012 14:44:51(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Guest

I suspect Landlords will have no choice as technically they are at work but its the vulnerable cash strapped elderly whom will be hit hard by this imho illegal attempt to make retrospective Building control. If your boiler is at risk then you cannot obtain a boiler care agreement either.
Shineon55  
#14 Posted : 02 November 2012 20:58:24(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Shineon55

This is a problem that is not about Building Regulations, or whether they are retrospective or not. This question has to do with the requirements of the Gas Safety (Installation & Use) Regulations, These flues were NEVER properly installed because they could not subsequently be examined simply because they were hidden in voids without inspection hatches. CORGI, and subsequently Gas Safe obviously felt that the initial categorisation of not to current standards was not sufficient, because as these flues age, they will deteriorate and could become unsafe. So, they bit the bullet and decided that after a suitable lead in time, they should be considered at risk. Shame they can't, or won't pursue the original installers but the bottom line is the installations are potentially dangerous.
BJC  
#15 Posted : 05 November 2012 09:49:30(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Guest

The older Building Regulations did take account of GSIUR regs its just that the HSE / Gas Safe are re interpretating the ACOP which is fine for new installations. Using your argument we should now pull down most victorian houses as they have potentially unstable foundations.
boblewis  
#16 Posted : 05 November 2012 11:04:16(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
boblewis

This question of flues has always been recognised it is just that the HSE have now tried to move the newbuild situation forward and somebody is jumping on the bandwagon to make work. I can see commercial premises being required to install inspection hatches but equally one could argue that the fitter can add an endoscope to his toolkit. I suspect this is also will be used to push some people into an all electric situation by other sharp operators. GasSafe engineers cannot refuse to service your boiler, they can advise of flue inadequacies however. But it is NOT a mandatory disconnection matter. Bob
Shineon55  
#17 Posted : 05 November 2012 13:01:07(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Shineon55

BJC wrote:
The older Building Regulations did take account of GSIUR regs its just that the HSE / Gas Safe are re interpretating the ACOP which is fine for new installations. Using your argument we should now pull down most victorian houses as they have potentially unstable foundations.
You're not comparing like for like. The foundations of old buildings don't get inspected every time work is done on it, unlike gas appliances where the flue has to be checked each time after they are worked on. Perhaps if they did perhaps more buildings would be labelled dangerous by Building Control, and as it is plenty of buidlings each year are found to be dangerous and needing remedial work - nothing stays the same for ever. Unfortunately there is a problem to be addressed, and it's going to disdvantage people, that's life (and better disdvantaged than dead of CO poisoning, which is the incident that triggered this whole issue0. If householders want, as Bob said, they can choose not to have their appliances turned off, its an "at risk" category not an "immediately dangerous". Personally, I'd get an inspection hatch sorted out.
BJC  
#18 Posted : 05 November 2012 14:31:28(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Guest

Wrong again from January they will not service your boiler without inspection hatches; which I suspect will see considerably more deaths than the one which occurred back in 2008 from unlicensed gas engineers, non serviced boilers and hypothermia. Apart from anything else there are other flue tests involving probes to detect issues in the clean air section of the pipe; however that would involve gas safe engineers forking out money rather than already cash strapped domestic house owners.
achrn  
#19 Posted : 05 November 2012 15:51:32(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
achrn

BJC wrote:
Wrong again from January they will not service your boiler without inspection hatches;
That's not what gas safe themselves say: http://www.gassaferegist...tly_asked_questions.aspx "What if I don’t have inspection hatches fitted? "From 1January 2013 gas engineers can continue to work on your boiler but should advise you that it is “At Risk” and will ask your permission to turn it off, to ensure they comply with industry guidance. If you choose not to fit inspection hatches, you should however continue to have your boiler maintained every year by a Gas Safe registered engineer."
BJC  
#20 Posted : 05 November 2012 16:11:44(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Guest

Its impossible to service a boiler that is turned off so yet again another blooper by Gas Safe. No company will also insure a boiler that is at risk.
Shineon55  
#21 Posted : 05 November 2012 16:29:18(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Shineon55

BJC wrote:
Its impossible to service a boiler that is turned off so yet again another blooper by Gas Safe.
Of course you can. The boiler gets serviced, the engineer issues the at risk warning if the flue can't be inspected and the householder makes a decision on following the advice or not. And probes won't tell you if the component parts of a flue have come apart, or are in danger of coming apart (flues running horizontally are prone to this) they simply measure the burner efficiency. Your initial point had some relevance, but really, perhaps time to take a deep breathe before continuing suggesting people are "wrong again" when the information available from both HSE and Gas safe clearly states the opposite.
BJC  
#22 Posted : 06 November 2012 09:17:54(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Guest

Carbon monoxide alarms are not an alternative to being able to see the flue and you will still need to have inspection hatches fitted. You have until 31 December 2012 for this work to be completed. It is recommended that inspection hatches are fitted as soon as you are able to do so. From 1 January 2013, any Gas Safe registered engineer will turn the boiler off, with your permission and formally advise you not to use it until inspection hatches have been fitted in appropriate places. Really well email gas safe or even one of the boiler care plan companies and you will be told the same - no flues no plan / service.
boblewis  
#23 Posted : 06 November 2012 10:48:32(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
boblewis

BJC Good business opportunity here for a Gas Safe engineer willing to follow the GasSafe and HSE guidelines properly. How will you enforce it domestically? The regs and guidelines do not a fitter to leave the boier compulsorarily switched off and the affixing of dangerous installation signs. For domestic customers CO monitors are a permitted alternative and one must remember that it is the potential for leaking into the occupied areas and voids that is the issue. Balanced flues through outside walls do not meet the criteria. At the end of the day the HSE have no direct powers over domestic householders. As I have said - commercial employers and landlords will face the HSE decisions however. You do need to note it is a reccomendation and NOT a requirement. Why - because the HSE know it is not in the regulations. Strangely while the Building Regs give guidance that the basic standard is for all new flues to have inspection hatches, particularly if shared by more than one occupier, it is actually open to any BR approved body, ie the BR Inspector, to accept a lower standard and sign off the structure. Once done there is formally no enforcement power to change the situation unless it is a commercial structure when the HSE then have enforcement powers. The devolution of Building Control powers in 1997 from sole Local Authority control has widespread effects. Bob Bob
Users browsing this topic
Guest (5)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.